Cargando…

Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)), arterial partial p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lisha, Wang, Yuxiu, Ye, Yaokun, Gao, JunYin, Zhu, Fabei, Min, Lingfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215746
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S402506
_version_ 1785044984154554368
author Zhang, Lisha
Wang, Yuxiu
Ye, Yaokun
Gao, JunYin
Zhu, Fabei
Min, Lingfeng
author_facet Zhang, Lisha
Wang, Yuxiu
Ye, Yaokun
Gao, JunYin
Zhu, Fabei
Min, Lingfeng
author_sort Zhang, Lisha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)), respiratory rate (RR), treatment failure, exacerbation rates, adverse events and comfort evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were retrieved from inception to September 30, 2022. Eligible trials were randomized controlled trials and crossover studies comparing HFNC and COT in hypercapnic COPD patients. Continuous variables were reported as mean and standard derivation and calculated by weighted mean differences (MD), while dichotomous variables were shown as frequency and proportion and calculated by odds ratio (OR), with the 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: Eight studies were included, five with acute hypercapnia and three with chronic hypercapnia. In acute hypercapnic COPD, short-term HFNC reduced PaCO(2) (MD −1.55, 95% CI: −2.85 to −0.25, I² = 0%, p <0.05) and treatment failure (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.88, I² = 0%, p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in PaO(2) (MD −0.36, 95% CI: −2.23 to 1.52, I² = 45%, p=0.71) and RR (MD −1.07, 95% CI: −2.44 to 0.29, I² = 72%, p=0.12). In chronic hypercapnic COPD, HFNC may reduce COPD exacerbation rates, but there was no advantage in improving PaCO(2) (MD −1.21, 95% CI: −3.81 to 1.39, I² = 0%, p=0.36) and PaO(2) (MD 2.81, 95% CI: −1.39 to 7.02, I² = 0%, p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Compared with COT, short-term HFNC reduced PaCO(2) and the need for escalating respiratory support in acute hypercapnic COPD, whereas long-term HFNC reduced COPD exacerbations rates in chronic hypercapnia. HFNC has great potential for treating hypercapnic COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10199684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101996842023-05-21 Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lisha Wang, Yuxiu Ye, Yaokun Gao, JunYin Zhu, Fabei Min, Lingfeng Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Review PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)), respiratory rate (RR), treatment failure, exacerbation rates, adverse events and comfort evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were retrieved from inception to September 30, 2022. Eligible trials were randomized controlled trials and crossover studies comparing HFNC and COT in hypercapnic COPD patients. Continuous variables were reported as mean and standard derivation and calculated by weighted mean differences (MD), while dichotomous variables were shown as frequency and proportion and calculated by odds ratio (OR), with the 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: Eight studies were included, five with acute hypercapnia and three with chronic hypercapnia. In acute hypercapnic COPD, short-term HFNC reduced PaCO(2) (MD −1.55, 95% CI: −2.85 to −0.25, I² = 0%, p <0.05) and treatment failure (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.88, I² = 0%, p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in PaO(2) (MD −0.36, 95% CI: −2.23 to 1.52, I² = 45%, p=0.71) and RR (MD −1.07, 95% CI: −2.44 to 0.29, I² = 72%, p=0.12). In chronic hypercapnic COPD, HFNC may reduce COPD exacerbation rates, but there was no advantage in improving PaCO(2) (MD −1.21, 95% CI: −3.81 to 1.39, I² = 0%, p=0.36) and PaO(2) (MD 2.81, 95% CI: −1.39 to 7.02, I² = 0%, p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Compared with COT, short-term HFNC reduced PaCO(2) and the need for escalating respiratory support in acute hypercapnic COPD, whereas long-term HFNC reduced COPD exacerbations rates in chronic hypercapnia. HFNC has great potential for treating hypercapnic COPD. Dove 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10199684/ /pubmed/37215746 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S402506 Text en © 2023 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Zhang, Lisha
Wang, Yuxiu
Ye, Yaokun
Gao, JunYin
Zhu, Fabei
Min, Lingfeng
Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula with Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of high-flow nasal cannula with conventional oxygen therapy in patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215746
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S402506
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglisha comparisonofhighflownasalcannulawithconventionaloxygentherapyinpatientswithhypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyuxiu comparisonofhighflownasalcannulawithconventionaloxygentherapyinpatientswithhypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yeyaokun comparisonofhighflownasalcannulawithconventionaloxygentherapyinpatientswithhypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaojunyin comparisonofhighflownasalcannulawithconventionaloxygentherapyinpatientswithhypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhufabei comparisonofhighflownasalcannulawithconventionaloxygentherapyinpatientswithhypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minlingfeng comparisonofhighflownasalcannulawithconventionaloxygentherapyinpatientswithhypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis