Cargando…

County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018

INTRODUCTION: Local data are increasingly needed for public health practice. County-level data on disabilities can be a valuable complement to existing estimates of disabilities. The objective of this study was to describe the county-level prevalence of disabilities among US adults and identify geog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Hua, Wang, Yan, Liu, Yong, Holt, James B., Okoro, Catherine A., Zhang, Xingyou, Zhang, Qing C., Greenlund, Kurt J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37167553
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230004
_version_ 1785044985879461888
author Lu, Hua
Wang, Yan
Liu, Yong
Holt, James B.
Okoro, Catherine A.
Zhang, Xingyou
Zhang, Qing C.
Greenlund, Kurt J.
author_facet Lu, Hua
Wang, Yan
Liu, Yong
Holt, James B.
Okoro, Catherine A.
Zhang, Xingyou
Zhang, Qing C.
Greenlund, Kurt J.
author_sort Lu, Hua
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Local data are increasingly needed for public health practice. County-level data on disabilities can be a valuable complement to existing estimates of disabilities. The objective of this study was to describe the county-level prevalence of disabilities among US adults and identify geographic clusters of counties with a higher or lower prevalence of disabilities. METHODS: We applied a multilevel logistic regression and poststratification approach to geocoded 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, Census 2018 county-level population estimates, and American Community Survey 2014–2018 poverty estimates to generate county-level estimates for 6 functional disabilities and any disability type. We used cluster-outlier spatial statistical methods to identify clustered counties. RESULTS: Among 3,142 counties, median estimated prevalence was 29.5% for any disability and differed by type: hearing (8.0%), vision (4.9%), cognition (11.5%), mobility (14.9%), self-care (3.7%), and independent living (7.2%). The spatial autocorrelation statistic, Moran’s I, was 0.70 for any disability and 0.60 or greater for all 6 types of disability, indicating that disabilities were highly clustered at the county level. We observed similar spatial cluster patterns in all disability types except hearing disability. CONCLUSION: The results suggest substantial differences in disability prevalence across US counties. These data, heretofore unavailable from a health survey, may help with planning programs at the county level to improve the quality of life for people with disabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10199691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101996912023-05-21 County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018 Lu, Hua Wang, Yan Liu, Yong Holt, James B. Okoro, Catherine A. Zhang, Xingyou Zhang, Qing C. Greenlund, Kurt J. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Local data are increasingly needed for public health practice. County-level data on disabilities can be a valuable complement to existing estimates of disabilities. The objective of this study was to describe the county-level prevalence of disabilities among US adults and identify geographic clusters of counties with a higher or lower prevalence of disabilities. METHODS: We applied a multilevel logistic regression and poststratification approach to geocoded 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, Census 2018 county-level population estimates, and American Community Survey 2014–2018 poverty estimates to generate county-level estimates for 6 functional disabilities and any disability type. We used cluster-outlier spatial statistical methods to identify clustered counties. RESULTS: Among 3,142 counties, median estimated prevalence was 29.5% for any disability and differed by type: hearing (8.0%), vision (4.9%), cognition (11.5%), mobility (14.9%), self-care (3.7%), and independent living (7.2%). The spatial autocorrelation statistic, Moran’s I, was 0.70 for any disability and 0.60 or greater for all 6 types of disability, indicating that disabilities were highly clustered at the county level. We observed similar spatial cluster patterns in all disability types except hearing disability. CONCLUSION: The results suggest substantial differences in disability prevalence across US counties. These data, heretofore unavailable from a health survey, may help with planning programs at the county level to improve the quality of life for people with disabilities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10199691/ /pubmed/37167553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230004 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Preventing Chronic Disease is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lu, Hua
Wang, Yan
Liu, Yong
Holt, James B.
Okoro, Catherine A.
Zhang, Xingyou
Zhang, Qing C.
Greenlund, Kurt J.
County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018
title County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018
title_full County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018
title_fullStr County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018
title_full_unstemmed County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018
title_short County-Level Geographic Disparities in Disabilities Among US Adults, 2018
title_sort county-level geographic disparities in disabilities among us adults, 2018
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37167553
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230004
work_keys_str_mv AT luhua countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT wangyan countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT liuyong countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT holtjamesb countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT okorocatherinea countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT zhangxingyou countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT zhangqingc countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018
AT greenlundkurtj countylevelgeographicdisparitiesindisabilitiesamongusadults2018