Cargando…

Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss

Objective Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay treatment and worsen outcomes. Screening tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buskmiller, Cara, Grauerholz, Kathryn R, Bute, Jennifer, Brann, Maria, Fredenburg, Michaelene, Refuerzo, Jerrie S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214013
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37884
_version_ 1785044992304087040
author Buskmiller, Cara
Grauerholz, Kathryn R
Bute, Jennifer
Brann, Maria
Fredenburg, Michaelene
Refuerzo, Jerrie S
author_facet Buskmiller, Cara
Grauerholz, Kathryn R
Bute, Jennifer
Brann, Maria
Fredenburg, Michaelene
Refuerzo, Jerrie S
author_sort Buskmiller, Cara
collection PubMed
description Objective Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay treatment and worsen outcomes. Screening tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale detect complicated grief poorly, and specific tools for prolonged or complicated grief after a reproductive loss are cumbersome. In this study, a five-item questionnaire to detect complicated grief after reproductive loss of any type was designed and preliminary validated. Methods A questionnaire patterned after the extensively validated Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) was created by a group of physicians and lay advocates to employ non-traumatic but specific language related to grief after miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. One hundred and forty women at a large academic center were recruited in person and via social media to validate the questionnaire with well-studied instruments for anxiety (7-item Panic Disorder Severity Scale, PDSS), trauma (22-item Impact of Events Scale), and reproductive grief and depressive symptoms (33-item Perinatal Grief Scale [PGS]). Results The response rate was 74.9%. Of the 140 participants, 18 (12.8%) experienced their loss during high-risk pregnancies, and 65 (46.4%) were recruited via social media. Seventy-one (51%) respondents had a score > 4, a positive screen for the BGQ. On average, women experienced their loss 2 years prior to participation (IQR 1-5 years). Cronbach's alpha was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83). The goodness of fit indices of the model met Fornell and Larker criteria (RMSEA = 0.167, CFI = 0.89, SRMR = 0.06). The AVE was 0.42 and the CR 0.78. Conclusions This investigator-created screening tool is internally consistent and meets preliminary criteria for discriminant validity. This tool can be refined prior to testing for sensitivity and specificity in screening for complicated grief after a reproductive loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10199718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101997182023-05-21 Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss Buskmiller, Cara Grauerholz, Kathryn R Bute, Jennifer Brann, Maria Fredenburg, Michaelene Refuerzo, Jerrie S Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Objective Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay treatment and worsen outcomes. Screening tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale detect complicated grief poorly, and specific tools for prolonged or complicated grief after a reproductive loss are cumbersome. In this study, a five-item questionnaire to detect complicated grief after reproductive loss of any type was designed and preliminary validated. Methods A questionnaire patterned after the extensively validated Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) was created by a group of physicians and lay advocates to employ non-traumatic but specific language related to grief after miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. One hundred and forty women at a large academic center were recruited in person and via social media to validate the questionnaire with well-studied instruments for anxiety (7-item Panic Disorder Severity Scale, PDSS), trauma (22-item Impact of Events Scale), and reproductive grief and depressive symptoms (33-item Perinatal Grief Scale [PGS]). Results The response rate was 74.9%. Of the 140 participants, 18 (12.8%) experienced their loss during high-risk pregnancies, and 65 (46.4%) were recruited via social media. Seventy-one (51%) respondents had a score > 4, a positive screen for the BGQ. On average, women experienced their loss 2 years prior to participation (IQR 1-5 years). Cronbach's alpha was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83). The goodness of fit indices of the model met Fornell and Larker criteria (RMSEA = 0.167, CFI = 0.89, SRMR = 0.06). The AVE was 0.42 and the CR 0.78. Conclusions This investigator-created screening tool is internally consistent and meets preliminary criteria for discriminant validity. This tool can be refined prior to testing for sensitivity and specificity in screening for complicated grief after a reproductive loss. Cureus 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10199718/ /pubmed/37214013 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37884 Text en Copyright © 2023, Buskmiller et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Buskmiller, Cara
Grauerholz, Kathryn R
Bute, Jennifer
Brann, Maria
Fredenburg, Michaelene
Refuerzo, Jerrie S
Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
title Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
title_full Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
title_fullStr Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
title_short Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
title_sort validation of a brief measure for complicated grief specific to reproductive loss
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214013
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37884
work_keys_str_mv AT buskmillercara validationofabriefmeasureforcomplicatedgriefspecifictoreproductiveloss
AT grauerholzkathrynr validationofabriefmeasureforcomplicatedgriefspecifictoreproductiveloss
AT butejennifer validationofabriefmeasureforcomplicatedgriefspecifictoreproductiveloss
AT brannmaria validationofabriefmeasureforcomplicatedgriefspecifictoreproductiveloss
AT fredenburgmichaelene validationofabriefmeasureforcomplicatedgriefspecifictoreproductiveloss
AT refuerzojerries validationofabriefmeasureforcomplicatedgriefspecifictoreproductiveloss