Cargando…
Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation
Terrestrial open water evaporation is difficult to measure both in situ and remotely yet is critical for understanding changes in reservoirs, lakes, and inland seas from human management and climatically altered hydrological cycling. Multiple satellite missions and data systems (e.g., ECOSTRESS, Ope...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34921-2 |
_version_ | 1785045031914045440 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Joshua B. Dohlen, Matthew B. Halverson, Gregory H. Collison, Jacob W. Pearson, Christopher Huntington, Justin L. |
author_facet | Fisher, Joshua B. Dohlen, Matthew B. Halverson, Gregory H. Collison, Jacob W. Pearson, Christopher Huntington, Justin L. |
author_sort | Fisher, Joshua B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Terrestrial open water evaporation is difficult to measure both in situ and remotely yet is critical for understanding changes in reservoirs, lakes, and inland seas from human management and climatically altered hydrological cycling. Multiple satellite missions and data systems (e.g., ECOSTRESS, OpenET) now operationally produce evapotranspiration (ET), but the open water evaporation data produced over millions of water bodies are algorithmically produced differently than the main ET data and are often overlooked in evaluation. Here, we evaluated the open water evaporation algorithm, AquaSEBS, used by ECOSTRESS and OpenET against 19 in situ open water evaporation sites from around the world using MODIS and Landsat data, making this one of the largest open water evaporation validations to date. Overall, our remotely sensed open water evaporation retrieval captured some variability and magnitude in the in situ data when controlling for high wind events (instantaneous: r(2) = 0.71; bias = 13% of mean; RMSE = 38% of mean). Much of the instantaneous uncertainty was due to high wind events (u > mean daily 7.5 m·s(−1)) when the open water evaporation process shifts from radiatively-controlled to atmospherically-controlled; not accounting for high wind events decreases instantaneous accuracy significantly (r(2) = 0.47; bias = 36% of mean; RMSE = 62% of mean). However, this sensitivity minimizes with temporal integration (e.g., daily RMSE = 1.2–1.5 mm·day(−1)). To benchmark AquaSEBS, we ran a suite of 11 machine learning models, but found that they did not significantly improve on the process-based formulation of AquaSEBS suggesting that the remaining error is from a combination of the in situ evaporation measurements, forcing data, and/or scaling mismatch; the machine learning models were able to predict error well in and of itself (r(2) = 0.74). Our results provide confidence in the remotely sensed open water evaporation data, though not without uncertainty, and a foundation by which current and future missions may build such operational data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10199918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101999182023-05-22 Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation Fisher, Joshua B. Dohlen, Matthew B. Halverson, Gregory H. Collison, Jacob W. Pearson, Christopher Huntington, Justin L. Sci Rep Article Terrestrial open water evaporation is difficult to measure both in situ and remotely yet is critical for understanding changes in reservoirs, lakes, and inland seas from human management and climatically altered hydrological cycling. Multiple satellite missions and data systems (e.g., ECOSTRESS, OpenET) now operationally produce evapotranspiration (ET), but the open water evaporation data produced over millions of water bodies are algorithmically produced differently than the main ET data and are often overlooked in evaluation. Here, we evaluated the open water evaporation algorithm, AquaSEBS, used by ECOSTRESS and OpenET against 19 in situ open water evaporation sites from around the world using MODIS and Landsat data, making this one of the largest open water evaporation validations to date. Overall, our remotely sensed open water evaporation retrieval captured some variability and magnitude in the in situ data when controlling for high wind events (instantaneous: r(2) = 0.71; bias = 13% of mean; RMSE = 38% of mean). Much of the instantaneous uncertainty was due to high wind events (u > mean daily 7.5 m·s(−1)) when the open water evaporation process shifts from radiatively-controlled to atmospherically-controlled; not accounting for high wind events decreases instantaneous accuracy significantly (r(2) = 0.47; bias = 36% of mean; RMSE = 62% of mean). However, this sensitivity minimizes with temporal integration (e.g., daily RMSE = 1.2–1.5 mm·day(−1)). To benchmark AquaSEBS, we ran a suite of 11 machine learning models, but found that they did not significantly improve on the process-based formulation of AquaSEBS suggesting that the remaining error is from a combination of the in situ evaporation measurements, forcing data, and/or scaling mismatch; the machine learning models were able to predict error well in and of itself (r(2) = 0.74). Our results provide confidence in the remotely sensed open water evaporation data, though not without uncertainty, and a foundation by which current and future missions may build such operational data. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10199918/ /pubmed/37210390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34921-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Fisher, Joshua B. Dohlen, Matthew B. Halverson, Gregory H. Collison, Jacob W. Pearson, Christopher Huntington, Justin L. Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
title | Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
title_full | Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
title_fullStr | Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
title_full_unstemmed | Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
title_short | Remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
title_sort | remotely sensed terrestrial open water evaporation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34921-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fisherjoshuab remotelysensedterrestrialopenwaterevaporation AT dohlenmatthewb remotelysensedterrestrialopenwaterevaporation AT halversongregoryh remotelysensedterrestrialopenwaterevaporation AT collisonjacobw remotelysensedterrestrialopenwaterevaporation AT pearsonchristopher remotelysensedterrestrialopenwaterevaporation AT huntingtonjustinl remotelysensedterrestrialopenwaterevaporation |