Cargando…
Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00483-4 |
_version_ | 1785045041549410304 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Shunyi Zhu, Yun Sui, Changzhong Li, Qian Jiang, Wenxin Zhang, Li |
author_facet | Fan, Shunyi Zhu, Yun Sui, Changzhong Li, Qian Jiang, Wenxin Zhang, Li |
author_sort | Fan, Shunyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or other procedures requiring short periods of sedation. This study aimed to establish whether remimazolam was effective and safe for inducing sedation for hysteroscopy. METHODS: One hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive induction with remimazolam or propofol. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam was administered. Propofol was started at 2–2.5 mg/kg. Before remimazolam or propofol induction, 1 μg/kg fentanyl was infused. Hemodynamic parameters, vital signs, and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured and adverse events recorded to evaluate safety. We comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the two drugs by the success rate of induction, fluctuation of vital signs, depth of anesthesia, adverse reactions, recovery time, and other indicators. RESULTS: Information on 83 patients was successfully recorded and carefully documented. The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group (group R) was 93%, which was lower than for the propofol group (group P) (100%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in group R (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in group P (67.4%), and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The fluctuation of vital signs in group P was more severe after induction, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam avoids the injection pain produced by propofol sedation, has a better pre-sedation experience, had the advantage of stable hemodynamics after injection compared to propofol, and a lower respiratory depression rate in the study patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10199972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101999722023-05-22 Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis Fan, Shunyi Zhu, Yun Sui, Changzhong Li, Qian Jiang, Wenxin Zhang, Li Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or other procedures requiring short periods of sedation. This study aimed to establish whether remimazolam was effective and safe for inducing sedation for hysteroscopy. METHODS: One hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive induction with remimazolam or propofol. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam was administered. Propofol was started at 2–2.5 mg/kg. Before remimazolam or propofol induction, 1 μg/kg fentanyl was infused. Hemodynamic parameters, vital signs, and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured and adverse events recorded to evaluate safety. We comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the two drugs by the success rate of induction, fluctuation of vital signs, depth of anesthesia, adverse reactions, recovery time, and other indicators. RESULTS: Information on 83 patients was successfully recorded and carefully documented. The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group (group R) was 93%, which was lower than for the propofol group (group P) (100%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in group R (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in group P (67.4%), and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The fluctuation of vital signs in group P was more severe after induction, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam avoids the injection pain produced by propofol sedation, has a better pre-sedation experience, had the advantage of stable hemodynamics after injection compared to propofol, and a lower respiratory depression rate in the study patients. Springer Healthcare 2023-03-11 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10199972/ /pubmed/36905564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00483-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fan, Shunyi Zhu, Yun Sui, Changzhong Li, Qian Jiang, Wenxin Zhang, Li Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis |
title | Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis |
title_full | Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis |
title_fullStr | Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis |
title_short | Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis |
title_sort | remimazolam compared to propofol during hysteroscopy: a safety and efficacy analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00483-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanshunyi remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis AT zhuyun remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis AT suichangzhong remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis AT liqian remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis AT jiangwenxin remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis AT zhangli remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis |