Cargando…

Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Shunyi, Zhu, Yun, Sui, Changzhong, Li, Qian, Jiang, Wenxin, Zhang, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00483-4
_version_ 1785045041549410304
author Fan, Shunyi
Zhu, Yun
Sui, Changzhong
Li, Qian
Jiang, Wenxin
Zhang, Li
author_facet Fan, Shunyi
Zhu, Yun
Sui, Changzhong
Li, Qian
Jiang, Wenxin
Zhang, Li
author_sort Fan, Shunyi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or other procedures requiring short periods of sedation. This study aimed to establish whether remimazolam was effective and safe for inducing sedation for hysteroscopy. METHODS: One hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive induction with remimazolam or propofol. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam was administered. Propofol was started at 2–2.5 mg/kg. Before remimazolam or propofol induction, 1 μg/kg fentanyl was infused. Hemodynamic parameters, vital signs, and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured and adverse events recorded to evaluate safety. We comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the two drugs by the success rate of induction, fluctuation of vital signs, depth of anesthesia, adverse reactions, recovery time, and other indicators. RESULTS: Information on 83 patients was successfully recorded and carefully documented. The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group (group R) was 93%, which was lower than for the propofol group (group P) (100%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in group R (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in group P (67.4%), and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The fluctuation of vital signs in group P was more severe after induction, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam avoids the injection pain produced by propofol sedation, has a better pre-sedation experience, had the advantage of stable hemodynamics after injection compared to propofol, and a lower respiratory depression rate in the study patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10199972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101999722023-05-22 Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis Fan, Shunyi Zhu, Yun Sui, Changzhong Li, Qian Jiang, Wenxin Zhang, Li Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or other procedures requiring short periods of sedation. This study aimed to establish whether remimazolam was effective and safe for inducing sedation for hysteroscopy. METHODS: One hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive induction with remimazolam or propofol. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam was administered. Propofol was started at 2–2.5 mg/kg. Before remimazolam or propofol induction, 1 μg/kg fentanyl was infused. Hemodynamic parameters, vital signs, and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured and adverse events recorded to evaluate safety. We comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the two drugs by the success rate of induction, fluctuation of vital signs, depth of anesthesia, adverse reactions, recovery time, and other indicators. RESULTS: Information on 83 patients was successfully recorded and carefully documented. The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group (group R) was 93%, which was lower than for the propofol group (group P) (100%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in group R (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in group P (67.4%), and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The fluctuation of vital signs in group P was more severe after induction, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam avoids the injection pain produced by propofol sedation, has a better pre-sedation experience, had the advantage of stable hemodynamics after injection compared to propofol, and a lower respiratory depression rate in the study patients. Springer Healthcare 2023-03-11 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10199972/ /pubmed/36905564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00483-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Fan, Shunyi
Zhu, Yun
Sui, Changzhong
Li, Qian
Jiang, Wenxin
Zhang, Li
Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
title Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
title_full Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
title_fullStr Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
title_short Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
title_sort remimazolam compared to propofol during hysteroscopy: a safety and efficacy analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00483-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fanshunyi remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis
AT zhuyun remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis
AT suichangzhong remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis
AT liqian remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis
AT jiangwenxin remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis
AT zhangli remimazolamcomparedtopropofolduringhysteroscopyasafetyandefficacyanalysis