Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common worldwide rising health issue among women with a prevalence of 5 to 70%. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common subtype of UI. There are different treatments for UI, including AUS (artificial urinary sphincter) implantation, as one of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shokri, Pourya, Kharaz, Ladan, Talebian, Niki, Borumandnia, Nasrin, Ziaee, Seyed Amir Mohsen, Shakhssalim, Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01274-x
_version_ 1785045055319310336
author Shokri, Pourya
Kharaz, Ladan
Talebian, Niki
Borumandnia, Nasrin
Ziaee, Seyed Amir Mohsen
Shakhssalim, Nasser
author_facet Shokri, Pourya
Kharaz, Ladan
Talebian, Niki
Borumandnia, Nasrin
Ziaee, Seyed Amir Mohsen
Shakhssalim, Nasser
author_sort Shokri, Pourya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common worldwide rising health issue among women with a prevalence of 5 to 70%. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common subtype of UI. There are different treatments for UI, including AUS (artificial urinary sphincter) implantation, as one of the surgical options for treating SUI. The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AUS, exclusively in female patients with SUI, which resulted from ISD (intrinsic sphincter deficiency). We also compared the complication rate between minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic surgery) and open approaches. METHODS: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies regarding complications in AUS implantation surgery, from the beginning of the project to March 2022. After screening and reviewing of full text, the general characteristics of the study and study population including follow-up time, type of surgery, and the number of complications that occurred such as necrosis, atrophy, erosion, infection, mechanical failure, revision, and leak, were extracted. RESULTS: We found that atrophy occurred in 1 of 188 (0.53%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 1 of 669 (0.15%) patients treated with open surgery. None of the 17 included studies reported the occurrence of necrosis in the patients under study. Erosion occurred in 9 of 188 (4.78%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 41 of 669 (6.12%) patients treated with open surgery. Infection occurred in 12 of 188 (6.38%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 22 of 669 (3.2%) patients treated with open surgery. The mechanical failure occurred in 1 of 188 (0.53%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 55 of 669 (8.22%) patients treated with open surgery. Reconstructive surgery occurred in 7 of 188 (3.72%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 95 of 669 (14.2%) patients treated with open surgery. Leaks occurred in 4 of 188 (2.12%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 6 of 669 (0.89%) patients treated with open surgery. The type of surgery was associated with a statistically significant increase in mechanical failure (p-value = 0.067) and infection (p-value = 0.021), and reconstructive surgery (p-value = 0.049). Out of the 857 participats in the study,469 were studied for less than five years and 388 were studied for more than five years.21 of 469 (4.4%) (p-value = 0.08) patients and 81 of 388 (20.8%) (p-value = 0.001) patients required reconstructive surgery. Erosion occurred in 23 of 469 (4.9%) (p-value = 0.01)patients with following time less than five years and in 27 of 388 (6.9%) (p-value = 0.001) patients with following time more than five years. CONCLUSION: The use of artificial urinary sphincters in the treatment of UI causes complications such as atrophy, erosion, and infection; the amount of which is influenced by the surgical method and the duration of using the artificial urinary sphincter. It seems that the use of new surgical methods, such as laparoscopic surgery, is useful in reducing the incidence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10200041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102000412023-05-22 A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency Shokri, Pourya Kharaz, Ladan Talebian, Niki Borumandnia, Nasrin Ziaee, Seyed Amir Mohsen Shakhssalim, Nasser BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common worldwide rising health issue among women with a prevalence of 5 to 70%. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common subtype of UI. There are different treatments for UI, including AUS (artificial urinary sphincter) implantation, as one of the surgical options for treating SUI. The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AUS, exclusively in female patients with SUI, which resulted from ISD (intrinsic sphincter deficiency). We also compared the complication rate between minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic surgery) and open approaches. METHODS: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies regarding complications in AUS implantation surgery, from the beginning of the project to March 2022. After screening and reviewing of full text, the general characteristics of the study and study population including follow-up time, type of surgery, and the number of complications that occurred such as necrosis, atrophy, erosion, infection, mechanical failure, revision, and leak, were extracted. RESULTS: We found that atrophy occurred in 1 of 188 (0.53%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 1 of 669 (0.15%) patients treated with open surgery. None of the 17 included studies reported the occurrence of necrosis in the patients under study. Erosion occurred in 9 of 188 (4.78%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 41 of 669 (6.12%) patients treated with open surgery. Infection occurred in 12 of 188 (6.38%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 22 of 669 (3.2%) patients treated with open surgery. The mechanical failure occurred in 1 of 188 (0.53%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 55 of 669 (8.22%) patients treated with open surgery. Reconstructive surgery occurred in 7 of 188 (3.72%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 95 of 669 (14.2%) patients treated with open surgery. Leaks occurred in 4 of 188 (2.12%) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and in 6 of 669 (0.89%) patients treated with open surgery. The type of surgery was associated with a statistically significant increase in mechanical failure (p-value = 0.067) and infection (p-value = 0.021), and reconstructive surgery (p-value = 0.049). Out of the 857 participats in the study,469 were studied for less than five years and 388 were studied for more than five years.21 of 469 (4.4%) (p-value = 0.08) patients and 81 of 388 (20.8%) (p-value = 0.001) patients required reconstructive surgery. Erosion occurred in 23 of 469 (4.9%) (p-value = 0.01)patients with following time less than five years and in 27 of 388 (6.9%) (p-value = 0.001) patients with following time more than five years. CONCLUSION: The use of artificial urinary sphincters in the treatment of UI causes complications such as atrophy, erosion, and infection; the amount of which is influenced by the surgical method and the duration of using the artificial urinary sphincter. It seems that the use of new surgical methods, such as laparoscopic surgery, is useful in reducing the incidence of complications. BioMed Central 2023-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10200041/ /pubmed/37210489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01274-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shokri, Pourya
Kharaz, Ladan
Talebian, Niki
Borumandnia, Nasrin
Ziaee, Seyed Amir Mohsen
Shakhssalim, Nasser
A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01274-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shokripourya asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT kharazladan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT talebianniki asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT borumandnianasrin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT ziaeeseyedamirmohsen asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT shakhssalimnasser asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT shokripourya systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT kharazladan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT talebianniki systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT borumandnianasrin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT ziaeeseyedamirmohsen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency
AT shakhssalimnasser systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomplicationsofartificialurinarysphinctersinfemalepatientswithurinaryincontinenceduetointernalsphincterinsufficiency