Cargando…

The Association Between Household Financial Burden and Patient Mobility and Their Impact on Loss to Follow-Up Among Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Guizhou, China

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the household financial burden due to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment and its predictors, examine its association with patient mobility, and test their impact on patient loss to follow-up (LTFU). METHODS: A cross-sectional study combining follow-up dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yun, Huang, Zhongfeng, Chen, Huijuan, Yuan, Ye, McNeil, Edward B, Lu, Xiaolong, Zhang, Aihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37220483
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S400667
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the household financial burden due to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment and its predictors, examine its association with patient mobility, and test their impact on patient loss to follow-up (LTFU). METHODS: A cross-sectional study combining follow-up data collection was conducted at the largest designated MDR-TB hospital in Guizhou. Data were collected from medical records and questionnaires. Household financial burden was measured by the incidence of 2 indicators: catastrophic total costs (CTC) and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). Mobility was classified as mover or non-mover after the patient’s address was verified twice. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify associations between variables. Model I and Model II were separated by CHE and CTC. RESULTS: Out of 180 households, the incidence of CHE and CTC was 51.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Families with low income and patients who were primary income earners were significantly associated with catastrophic costs. 42.8% of patients were movers. Patients from households with CHE (OR(adj)=2.2, 95% CI: 1.1–4.1) or with CTC (OR(adj)=2.6, 95% CI: 1.1–6.3) were more likely to move. Finding a job against financial difficulty (58.4%) was the top reason for movers. 20.0% of patients experienced LTFU. Patients from households with catastrophic payments (CHE: OR(adj)=4.1, 95% CI 1.6–10.5 in Model I; CTC: OR(adj)=4.8, 95% CI 1.0–22.9 in Model II), patients who were movers (OR(adj)=6.1, 95% CI 2.5–14.8 in Model I; OR(adj)=7.4, 95% CI 3.0–18.7 in Model II) and primary income earners (OR(adj)=2.5, 95% CI: 1.0–5.9 in Model I; OR(adj)=2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.6 in Model II) had an increased risk of LTFU. CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between household financial burden due to MDR-TB treatment and patient mobility in Guizhou. They impact patients’ treatment adherence and cause LTFU. Being a primary breadwinner increases the risk for catastrophic household payments and LTFU.