Cargando…

The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience

Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) mediated exon skipping aims to reframe dystrophin transcripts for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently 4 ASOs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration targeting exon 45, 51 and 53 based on low level dystrophin restoration. Additiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke, De Waele, Liesbeth, Houwen-Opstal, Saskia, Kirschner, Janbernd, Krom, Yvonne D., Mercuri, Eugenio, Niks, Erik H., Straub, Volker, van Duyvenvoorde, Hermine A., Vroom, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JND-221648
_version_ 1785045087624888320
author Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke
De Waele, Liesbeth
Houwen-Opstal, Saskia
Kirschner, Janbernd
Krom, Yvonne D.
Mercuri, Eugenio
Niks, Erik H.
Straub, Volker
van Duyvenvoorde, Hermine A.
Vroom, Elizabeth
author_facet Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke
De Waele, Liesbeth
Houwen-Opstal, Saskia
Kirschner, Janbernd
Krom, Yvonne D.
Mercuri, Eugenio
Niks, Erik H.
Straub, Volker
van Duyvenvoorde, Hermine A.
Vroom, Elizabeth
author_sort Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke
collection PubMed
description Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) mediated exon skipping aims to reframe dystrophin transcripts for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently 4 ASOs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration targeting exon 45, 51 and 53 based on low level dystrophin restoration. Additional studies to confirm functional effects are ongoing. Furthermore, efforts are ongoing to increase muscle specific delivery of ASOs. Consequently, there are 5 clinical trials ongoing or planned for exon 51 skipping ASOs in Europe. While exon 51 skipping applies to the largest group of patients, DMD expert centers do not have sufficient numbers of patients or capacity to run all these trials in parallel. Even at a national level numbers may be too scarce. At the same time, some families now face the choice between participation in different clinical trials of exon 51 skipping, sometimes in addition to the choice of participating in a micro-dystrophin gene therapy trial. In this opinion paper, we outline the challenges, compare the different exon 51 skipping trials, and outline how different European centers and countries try to cope with running multiple trials in parallel for a small group of eligible patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10200189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102001892023-05-22 The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke De Waele, Liesbeth Houwen-Opstal, Saskia Kirschner, Janbernd Krom, Yvonne D. Mercuri, Eugenio Niks, Erik H. Straub, Volker van Duyvenvoorde, Hermine A. Vroom, Elizabeth J Neuromuscul Dis Commentary Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) mediated exon skipping aims to reframe dystrophin transcripts for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently 4 ASOs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration targeting exon 45, 51 and 53 based on low level dystrophin restoration. Additional studies to confirm functional effects are ongoing. Furthermore, efforts are ongoing to increase muscle specific delivery of ASOs. Consequently, there are 5 clinical trials ongoing or planned for exon 51 skipping ASOs in Europe. While exon 51 skipping applies to the largest group of patients, DMD expert centers do not have sufficient numbers of patients or capacity to run all these trials in parallel. Even at a national level numbers may be too scarce. At the same time, some families now face the choice between participation in different clinical trials of exon 51 skipping, sometimes in addition to the choice of participating in a micro-dystrophin gene therapy trial. In this opinion paper, we outline the challenges, compare the different exon 51 skipping trials, and outline how different European centers and countries try to cope with running multiple trials in parallel for a small group of eligible patients. IOS Press 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10200189/ /pubmed/36911945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JND-221648 Text en © 2023 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Commentary
Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke
De Waele, Liesbeth
Houwen-Opstal, Saskia
Kirschner, Janbernd
Krom, Yvonne D.
Mercuri, Eugenio
Niks, Erik H.
Straub, Volker
van Duyvenvoorde, Hermine A.
Vroom, Elizabeth
The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience
title The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience
title_full The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience
title_fullStr The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience
title_full_unstemmed The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience
title_short The Dilemma of Choice for Duchenne Patients Eligible for Exon 51 Skipping The European Experience
title_sort dilemma of choice for duchenne patients eligible for exon 51 skipping the european experience
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JND-221648
work_keys_str_mv AT aartsmarusannemieke thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT dewaeleliesbeth thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT houwenopstalsaskia thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT kirschnerjanbernd thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT kromyvonned thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT mercurieugenio thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT nikserikh thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT straubvolker thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT vanduyvenvoordeherminea thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT vroomelizabeth thedilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT aartsmarusannemieke dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT dewaeleliesbeth dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT houwenopstalsaskia dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT kirschnerjanbernd dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT kromyvonned dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT mercurieugenio dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT nikserikh dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT straubvolker dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT vanduyvenvoordeherminea dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience
AT vroomelizabeth dilemmaofchoiceforduchennepatientseligibleforexon51skippingtheeuropeanexperience