Cargando…
Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
BACKGROUND: A timely diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) can greatly reduce the death rate of patients. However, the manual detection of EGC is a costly and low-accuracy task. The artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning is considered as a potential method to detect EGC. AI met...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37066932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-236027 |
_version_ | 1785045100669173760 |
---|---|
author | Su, Xiufeng Liu, Qingshan Gao, Xiaozhong Ma, Liyong |
author_facet | Su, Xiufeng Liu, Qingshan Gao, Xiaozhong Ma, Liyong |
author_sort | Su, Xiufeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A timely diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) can greatly reduce the death rate of patients. However, the manual detection of EGC is a costly and low-accuracy task. The artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning is considered as a potential method to detect EGC. AI methods have outperformed endoscopists in EGC detection, especially with the use of the different region convolutional neural network (RCNN) models recently reported. However, no studies compared the performances of different RCNN series models. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performances of different RCNN series models for EGC. METHODS: Three typical RCNN models were used to detect gastric cancer using 3659 gastroscopic images, including 1434 images of EGC: Faster RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN. RESULTS: The models were evaluated in terms of specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and AP. Fast RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN had similar accuracy (0.935, 0.938, and 0.935). The specificity of Cascade RCNN was 0.946, which was slightly higher than 0.908 for Faster RCNN and 0.908 for Mask RCNN. CONCLUSION: Faster RCNN and Mask RCNN place more emphasis on positive detection, and Cascade RCNN places more emphasis on negative detection. These methods based on deep learning were conducive to helping in early cancer diagnosis using endoscopic images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10200245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102002452023-05-22 Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images Su, Xiufeng Liu, Qingshan Gao, Xiaozhong Ma, Liyong Technol Health Care Research Article BACKGROUND: A timely diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) can greatly reduce the death rate of patients. However, the manual detection of EGC is a costly and low-accuracy task. The artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning is considered as a potential method to detect EGC. AI methods have outperformed endoscopists in EGC detection, especially with the use of the different region convolutional neural network (RCNN) models recently reported. However, no studies compared the performances of different RCNN series models. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performances of different RCNN series models for EGC. METHODS: Three typical RCNN models were used to detect gastric cancer using 3659 gastroscopic images, including 1434 images of EGC: Faster RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN. RESULTS: The models were evaluated in terms of specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and AP. Fast RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN had similar accuracy (0.935, 0.938, and 0.935). The specificity of Cascade RCNN was 0.946, which was slightly higher than 0.908 for Faster RCNN and 0.908 for Mask RCNN. CONCLUSION: Faster RCNN and Mask RCNN place more emphasis on positive detection, and Cascade RCNN places more emphasis on negative detection. These methods based on deep learning were conducive to helping in early cancer diagnosis using endoscopic images. IOS Press 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10200245/ /pubmed/37066932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-236027 Text en © 2023 – The authors. Published by IOS Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Su, Xiufeng Liu, Qingshan Gao, Xiaozhong Ma, Liyong Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
title | Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
title_full | Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
title_short | Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
title_sort | evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37066932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-236027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suxiufeng evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages AT liuqingshan evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages AT gaoxiaozhong evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages AT maliyong evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages |