Cargando…

Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images

BACKGROUND: A timely diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) can greatly reduce the death rate of patients. However, the manual detection of EGC is a costly and low-accuracy task. The artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning is considered as a potential method to detect EGC. AI met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Xiufeng, Liu, Qingshan, Gao, Xiaozhong, Ma, Liyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37066932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-236027
_version_ 1785045100669173760
author Su, Xiufeng
Liu, Qingshan
Gao, Xiaozhong
Ma, Liyong
author_facet Su, Xiufeng
Liu, Qingshan
Gao, Xiaozhong
Ma, Liyong
author_sort Su, Xiufeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A timely diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) can greatly reduce the death rate of patients. However, the manual detection of EGC is a costly and low-accuracy task. The artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning is considered as a potential method to detect EGC. AI methods have outperformed endoscopists in EGC detection, especially with the use of the different region convolutional neural network (RCNN) models recently reported. However, no studies compared the performances of different RCNN series models. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performances of different RCNN series models for EGC. METHODS: Three typical RCNN models were used to detect gastric cancer using 3659 gastroscopic images, including 1434 images of EGC: Faster RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN. RESULTS: The models were evaluated in terms of specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and AP. Fast RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN had similar accuracy (0.935, 0.938, and 0.935). The specificity of Cascade RCNN was 0.946, which was slightly higher than 0.908 for Faster RCNN and 0.908 for Mask RCNN. CONCLUSION: Faster RCNN and Mask RCNN place more emphasis on positive detection, and Cascade RCNN places more emphasis on negative detection. These methods based on deep learning were conducive to helping in early cancer diagnosis using endoscopic images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10200245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102002452023-05-22 Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images Su, Xiufeng Liu, Qingshan Gao, Xiaozhong Ma, Liyong Technol Health Care Research Article BACKGROUND: A timely diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) can greatly reduce the death rate of patients. However, the manual detection of EGC is a costly and low-accuracy task. The artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning is considered as a potential method to detect EGC. AI methods have outperformed endoscopists in EGC detection, especially with the use of the different region convolutional neural network (RCNN) models recently reported. However, no studies compared the performances of different RCNN series models. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performances of different RCNN series models for EGC. METHODS: Three typical RCNN models were used to detect gastric cancer using 3659 gastroscopic images, including 1434 images of EGC: Faster RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN. RESULTS: The models were evaluated in terms of specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and AP. Fast RCNN, Cascade RCNN, and Mask RCNN had similar accuracy (0.935, 0.938, and 0.935). The specificity of Cascade RCNN was 0.946, which was slightly higher than 0.908 for Faster RCNN and 0.908 for Mask RCNN. CONCLUSION: Faster RCNN and Mask RCNN place more emphasis on positive detection, and Cascade RCNN places more emphasis on negative detection. These methods based on deep learning were conducive to helping in early cancer diagnosis using endoscopic images. IOS Press 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10200245/ /pubmed/37066932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-236027 Text en © 2023 – The authors. Published by IOS Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Su, Xiufeng
Liu, Qingshan
Gao, Xiaozhong
Ma, Liyong
Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
title Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
title_full Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
title_fullStr Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
title_short Evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
title_sort evaluation of deep learning methods for early gastric cancer detection using gastroscopic images
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37066932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-236027
work_keys_str_mv AT suxiufeng evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages
AT liuqingshan evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages
AT gaoxiaozhong evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages
AT maliyong evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforearlygastriccancerdetectionusinggastroscopicimages