Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls
BACKGROUND: The 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) is widely used to assess concerns-about-falling. Variants include 7-item Short FES-I, 30-item Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon FES) and 10-item short Icon FES. No comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis has been co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37211363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad055 |
_version_ | 1785045117591093248 |
---|---|
author | McGarrigle, Lisa Yang, Yang Lasrado, Reena Gittins, Matthew Todd, Chris |
author_facet | McGarrigle, Lisa Yang, Yang Lasrado, Reena Gittins, Matthew Todd, Chris |
author_sort | McGarrigle, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) is widely used to assess concerns-about-falling. Variants include 7-item Short FES-I, 30-item Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon FES) and 10-item short Icon FES. No comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to synthesise evidence regarding the measurement properties of these tools. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of four FES-I variants. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched systematically and articles were assessed for eligibility independently. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist. The quality of measurement properties was assessed using COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties. Where possible, meta-analysis was conducted; otherwise, narrative synthesis was performed. Overall certainty of evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system approach. RESULTS: The review included 58 studies investigating measurement properties of the four instruments. There was high-quality evidence to support internal consistency, reliability and construct validity of all instruments. Moderate- to high-certainty evidence suggests one-factor structure of FES-I with two underlying dimensions, one-factor structure of Short FES-I and two-factor structure of Icon FES. There was high-certainty evidence to support the responsiveness of FES-I, with further research needed for the other instruments. CONCLUSION: There is evidence for excellent measurement properties of all four instruments. We recommend the use of these tools with healthy older people and people at a greater risk of falls due to conditions that might affect mobility and balance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10200549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102005492023-05-22 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls McGarrigle, Lisa Yang, Yang Lasrado, Reena Gittins, Matthew Todd, Chris Age Ageing Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) is widely used to assess concerns-about-falling. Variants include 7-item Short FES-I, 30-item Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon FES) and 10-item short Icon FES. No comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to synthesise evidence regarding the measurement properties of these tools. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of four FES-I variants. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched systematically and articles were assessed for eligibility independently. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist. The quality of measurement properties was assessed using COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties. Where possible, meta-analysis was conducted; otherwise, narrative synthesis was performed. Overall certainty of evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system approach. RESULTS: The review included 58 studies investigating measurement properties of the four instruments. There was high-quality evidence to support internal consistency, reliability and construct validity of all instruments. Moderate- to high-certainty evidence suggests one-factor structure of FES-I with two underlying dimensions, one-factor structure of Short FES-I and two-factor structure of Icon FES. There was high-certainty evidence to support the responsiveness of FES-I, with further research needed for the other instruments. CONCLUSION: There is evidence for excellent measurement properties of all four instruments. We recommend the use of these tools with healthy older people and people at a greater risk of falls due to conditions that might affect mobility and balance. Oxford University Press 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10200549/ /pubmed/37211363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad055 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review McGarrigle, Lisa Yang, Yang Lasrado, Reena Gittins, Matthew Todd, Chris A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37211363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgarriglelisa asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT yangyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT lasradoreena asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT gittinsmatthew asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT toddchris asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT mcgarriglelisa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT yangyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT lasradoreena systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT gittinsmatthew systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls AT toddchris systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthemeasurementpropertiesofconcernsaboutfallinginstrumentsinolderpeopleandpeopleatincreasedriskoffalls |