Cargando…

Proteomic analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles highlights specific signatures for patients with primary aldosteronism

BACKGROUND: Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) can be released by different cell types facing the urogenital tract and are involved in cellular trafficking, differentiation and survival. UEVs can be easily detected in urine and provide pathophysiological information “in vivo” without the need of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertolone, Lorenzo, Castagna, Annalisa, Manfredi, Marcello, De Santis, Domenica, Ambrosani, Francesca, Antinori, Elisa, Mulatero, Paolo, Danese, Elisa, Marengo, Emilio, Barberis, Elettra, Veneri, Mariangela, Martinelli, Nicola, Friso, Simonetta, Pizzolo, Francesca, Olivieri, Oliviero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1096441
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) can be released by different cell types facing the urogenital tract and are involved in cellular trafficking, differentiation and survival. UEVs can be easily detected in urine and provide pathophysiological information “in vivo” without the need of a biopsy. Based on these premises, we hypothesized that uEVs proteomic profile may serve as a valuable tool in the differential characterization between Essential Hypertension (EH) and primary aldosteronism (PA). METHODS: Patients with essential hypertension (EH) and PA were enrolled in the study (EH= 12, PA=24: 11 Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism subtype (BPA) and 13 Aldosterone Producing Adenoma (APA)). Clinical and biochemical parameters were available for all the subjects. UEVs were isolated from urine by ultracentrifugation and analysed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and nanotrack particle analysis (NTA). UEVs protein content was investigated through an untargeted MS-based approach. Statistical and network analysis was performed to identify potential candidates for the identification and classification of PA. RESULTS: MS analysis provided more than 300 protein identifications. Exosomal markers CD9 and CD63 were detected in all samples. Several molecules characterizing EH vs PA patients as well as BPA and APA subtypes were identified after statistical elaboration and filtering of the results. In particular, some key proteins involved in water reabsorption mechanisms, such as AQP1 and AQP2, were among the best candidates for discriminating EH vs PA, as well as A1AG1 (AGP1). CONCLUSION: Through this proteomic approach, we identified uEVs molecular indicators that can improve PA characterization and help in the gain of insights of the pathophysiological features of this disease. In particular, PA was characterized by a reduction of AQP1 and AQP2 expression as compared with EH.