Cargando…
Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests
INTRODUCTION: Conductance-photosynthesis (G(s)-A) models, accompanying with light use efficiency (LUE) models for calculating carbon assimilation, are widely used for estimating canopy stomatal conductance (G(s)) and transpiration (T(c)) under the two-leaf (TL) scheme. However, the key parameters of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223791 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1164078 |
_version_ | 1785045165395673088 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Jiaxin Liu, Ying Hou, Weiye Cai, Yulong Zhang, Fengyan Wang, Ying Fang, Xiuqin Huang, Lingxiao Yong, Bin Ren, Liliang |
author_facet | Jin, Jiaxin Liu, Ying Hou, Weiye Cai, Yulong Zhang, Fengyan Wang, Ying Fang, Xiuqin Huang, Lingxiao Yong, Bin Ren, Liliang |
author_sort | Jin, Jiaxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Conductance-photosynthesis (G(s)-A) models, accompanying with light use efficiency (LUE) models for calculating carbon assimilation, are widely used for estimating canopy stomatal conductance (G(s)) and transpiration (T(c)) under the two-leaf (TL) scheme. However, the key parameters of photosynthetic rate sensitivity (g(su) and g(sh)) and maximum LUE (ϵ(msu) and ϵ(msh)) are typically set to temporally constant values for sunlit and shaded leaves, respectively. This may result in T(c) estimation errors, as it contradicts field observations. METHODS: In this study, the measured flux data from three temperate deciduous broadleaved forests (DBF) FLUXNET sites were adopted, and the key parameters of LUE and Ball-Berry models for sunlit and shaded leaves were calibrated within the entire growing season and each season, respectively. Then, the estimations of gross primary production (GPP) and T(c) were compared between the two schemes of parameterization: (1) entire growing season-based fixed parameters (EGS) and (2) season-specific dynamic parameters (SEA). RESULTS: Our results show a cyclical variability of ϵ(msu) across the sites, with the highest value during the summer and the lowest during the spring. A similar pattern was found for g(su) and g(sh), which showed a decrease in summer and a slight increase in both spring and autumn. Furthermore, the SEA model (i.e., the dynamic parameterization) better simulated GPP, with a reduction in root mean square error (RMSE) of about 8.0 ± 1.1% and an improvement in correlation coefficient (r) of 3.7 ± 1.5%, relative to the EGS model. Meanwhile, the SEA scheme reduced T(c) simulation errors in terms of RMSE by 3.7 ± 4.4%. DISCUSSION: These findings provide a greater understanding of the seasonality of plant functional traits, and help to improve simulations of seasonal carbon and water fluxes in temperate forests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10200961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102009612023-05-23 Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests Jin, Jiaxin Liu, Ying Hou, Weiye Cai, Yulong Zhang, Fengyan Wang, Ying Fang, Xiuqin Huang, Lingxiao Yong, Bin Ren, Liliang Front Plant Sci Plant Science INTRODUCTION: Conductance-photosynthesis (G(s)-A) models, accompanying with light use efficiency (LUE) models for calculating carbon assimilation, are widely used for estimating canopy stomatal conductance (G(s)) and transpiration (T(c)) under the two-leaf (TL) scheme. However, the key parameters of photosynthetic rate sensitivity (g(su) and g(sh)) and maximum LUE (ϵ(msu) and ϵ(msh)) are typically set to temporally constant values for sunlit and shaded leaves, respectively. This may result in T(c) estimation errors, as it contradicts field observations. METHODS: In this study, the measured flux data from three temperate deciduous broadleaved forests (DBF) FLUXNET sites were adopted, and the key parameters of LUE and Ball-Berry models for sunlit and shaded leaves were calibrated within the entire growing season and each season, respectively. Then, the estimations of gross primary production (GPP) and T(c) were compared between the two schemes of parameterization: (1) entire growing season-based fixed parameters (EGS) and (2) season-specific dynamic parameters (SEA). RESULTS: Our results show a cyclical variability of ϵ(msu) across the sites, with the highest value during the summer and the lowest during the spring. A similar pattern was found for g(su) and g(sh), which showed a decrease in summer and a slight increase in both spring and autumn. Furthermore, the SEA model (i.e., the dynamic parameterization) better simulated GPP, with a reduction in root mean square error (RMSE) of about 8.0 ± 1.1% and an improvement in correlation coefficient (r) of 3.7 ± 1.5%, relative to the EGS model. Meanwhile, the SEA scheme reduced T(c) simulation errors in terms of RMSE by 3.7 ± 4.4%. DISCUSSION: These findings provide a greater understanding of the seasonality of plant functional traits, and help to improve simulations of seasonal carbon and water fluxes in temperate forests. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10200961/ /pubmed/37223791 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1164078 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jin, Liu, Hou, Cai, Zhang, Wang, Fang, Huang, Yong and Ren https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Jin, Jiaxin Liu, Ying Hou, Weiye Cai, Yulong Zhang, Fengyan Wang, Ying Fang, Xiuqin Huang, Lingxiao Yong, Bin Ren, Liliang Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
title | Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
title_full | Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
title_fullStr | Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
title_full_unstemmed | Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
title_short | Improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
title_sort | improvement of transpiration estimation based on a two-leaf conductance-photosynthesis model with seasonal parameters for temperate deciduous forests |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223791 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1164078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinjiaxin improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT liuying improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT houweiye improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT caiyulong improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT zhangfengyan improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT wangying improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT fangxiuqin improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT huanglingxiao improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT yongbin improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests AT renliliang improvementoftranspirationestimationbasedonatwoleafconductancephotosynthesismodelwithseasonalparametersfortemperatedeciduousforests |