Cargando…

Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Routine execution of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a good practice to help early identification of biliary duct injuries (BDIs) or common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study aimed to determine the impact of IOC during LC. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esposito, Francesco, Scoleri, Iolanda, Cattan, Rafika, Cook, Marie Cecile, Sacrieru, Dorin, Meziani, Nouredine, Del Prete, Marco, Kabbej, Morad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653318
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-099
_version_ 1785045187023601664
author Esposito, Francesco
Scoleri, Iolanda
Cattan, Rafika
Cook, Marie Cecile
Sacrieru, Dorin
Meziani, Nouredine
Del Prete, Marco
Kabbej, Morad
author_facet Esposito, Francesco
Scoleri, Iolanda
Cattan, Rafika
Cook, Marie Cecile
Sacrieru, Dorin
Meziani, Nouredine
Del Prete, Marco
Kabbej, Morad
author_sort Esposito, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Routine execution of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a good practice to help early identification of biliary duct injuries (BDIs) or common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study aimed to determine the impact of IOC during LC. METHODS: This is a retrospective, monocentric study, including patients with a LC performed from January 2020 to December 2021. RESULTS: Of 303 patients, 215 (71.0%) were in the IOC group and 88 (29.0%) in the no-IOC group. IOC was incomplete or unclear in 10.7% of patients, with a failure rate of 14.7%. Operating time was 15 minutes longer in the IOC group (p = 0.01), and postoperative complications were higher (5.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). There were three BDIs (0.99%), all included in the IOC group; only one was diagnosed intraoperatively, and the other two were identified during the postoperative course. Regarding identifying CBD stones, IOC showed a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 98%, an accuracy of 97.2%, a positive predictive value of 63% and a negative predictive value of 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic IOC has shown no specific benefits and prolonged operative duration. IOC should be performed on selected patients or in situations of uncertainty on the anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102010562023-05-23 Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? Esposito, Francesco Scoleri, Iolanda Cattan, Rafika Cook, Marie Cecile Sacrieru, Dorin Meziani, Nouredine Del Prete, Marco Kabbej, Morad Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Original Article BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Routine execution of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a good practice to help early identification of biliary duct injuries (BDIs) or common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study aimed to determine the impact of IOC during LC. METHODS: This is a retrospective, monocentric study, including patients with a LC performed from January 2020 to December 2021. RESULTS: Of 303 patients, 215 (71.0%) were in the IOC group and 88 (29.0%) in the no-IOC group. IOC was incomplete or unclear in 10.7% of patients, with a failure rate of 14.7%. Operating time was 15 minutes longer in the IOC group (p = 0.01), and postoperative complications were higher (5.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). There were three BDIs (0.99%), all included in the IOC group; only one was diagnosed intraoperatively, and the other two were identified during the postoperative course. Regarding identifying CBD stones, IOC showed a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 98%, an accuracy of 97.2%, a positive predictive value of 63% and a negative predictive value of 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic IOC has shown no specific benefits and prolonged operative duration. IOC should be performed on selected patients or in situations of uncertainty on the anatomy. The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2023-05-31 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10201056/ /pubmed/36653318 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-099 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Esposito, Francesco
Scoleri, Iolanda
Cattan, Rafika
Cook, Marie Cecile
Sacrieru, Dorin
Meziani, Nouredine
Del Prete, Marco
Kabbej, Morad
Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
title Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
title_full Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
title_fullStr Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
title_full_unstemmed Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
title_short Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
title_sort systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a justifiable practice?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653318
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-099
work_keys_str_mv AT espositofrancesco systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT scoleriiolanda systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT cattanrafika systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT cookmariececile systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT sacrierudorin systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT mezianinouredine systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT delpretemarco systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice
AT kabbejmorad systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice