Cargando…
Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice?
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Routine execution of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a good practice to help early identification of biliary duct injuries (BDIs) or common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study aimed to determine the impact of IOC during LC. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653318 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-099 |
_version_ | 1785045187023601664 |
---|---|
author | Esposito, Francesco Scoleri, Iolanda Cattan, Rafika Cook, Marie Cecile Sacrieru, Dorin Meziani, Nouredine Del Prete, Marco Kabbej, Morad |
author_facet | Esposito, Francesco Scoleri, Iolanda Cattan, Rafika Cook, Marie Cecile Sacrieru, Dorin Meziani, Nouredine Del Prete, Marco Kabbej, Morad |
author_sort | Esposito, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Routine execution of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a good practice to help early identification of biliary duct injuries (BDIs) or common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study aimed to determine the impact of IOC during LC. METHODS: This is a retrospective, monocentric study, including patients with a LC performed from January 2020 to December 2021. RESULTS: Of 303 patients, 215 (71.0%) were in the IOC group and 88 (29.0%) in the no-IOC group. IOC was incomplete or unclear in 10.7% of patients, with a failure rate of 14.7%. Operating time was 15 minutes longer in the IOC group (p = 0.01), and postoperative complications were higher (5.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). There were three BDIs (0.99%), all included in the IOC group; only one was diagnosed intraoperatively, and the other two were identified during the postoperative course. Regarding identifying CBD stones, IOC showed a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 98%, an accuracy of 97.2%, a positive predictive value of 63% and a negative predictive value of 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic IOC has shown no specific benefits and prolonged operative duration. IOC should be performed on selected patients or in situations of uncertainty on the anatomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10201056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102010562023-05-23 Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? Esposito, Francesco Scoleri, Iolanda Cattan, Rafika Cook, Marie Cecile Sacrieru, Dorin Meziani, Nouredine Del Prete, Marco Kabbej, Morad Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Original Article BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Routine execution of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a good practice to help early identification of biliary duct injuries (BDIs) or common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study aimed to determine the impact of IOC during LC. METHODS: This is a retrospective, monocentric study, including patients with a LC performed from January 2020 to December 2021. RESULTS: Of 303 patients, 215 (71.0%) were in the IOC group and 88 (29.0%) in the no-IOC group. IOC was incomplete or unclear in 10.7% of patients, with a failure rate of 14.7%. Operating time was 15 minutes longer in the IOC group (p = 0.01), and postoperative complications were higher (5.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). There were three BDIs (0.99%), all included in the IOC group; only one was diagnosed intraoperatively, and the other two were identified during the postoperative course. Regarding identifying CBD stones, IOC showed a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 98%, an accuracy of 97.2%, a positive predictive value of 63% and a negative predictive value of 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic IOC has shown no specific benefits and prolonged operative duration. IOC should be performed on selected patients or in situations of uncertainty on the anatomy. The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2023-05-31 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10201056/ /pubmed/36653318 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-099 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Esposito, Francesco Scoleri, Iolanda Cattan, Rafika Cook, Marie Cecile Sacrieru, Dorin Meziani, Nouredine Del Prete, Marco Kabbej, Morad Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? |
title | Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? |
title_full | Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? |
title_fullStr | Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? |
title_short | Systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it a justifiable practice? |
title_sort | systematic intraoperative cholangiography during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a justifiable practice? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653318 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.22-099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espositofrancesco systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT scoleriiolanda systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT cattanrafika systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT cookmariececile systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT sacrierudorin systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT mezianinouredine systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT delpretemarco systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice AT kabbejmorad systematicintraoperativecholangiographyduringelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomyisitajustifiablepractice |