Cargando…

Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss

BACKGROUND: Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bozzo, Isabella, Kooner, Paul, Nelson, Ralph, Marwan, Yousef, Paruthikunnan, Samir, Laverdière, Carl, Boily, Mathieu, Martineau, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168879
_version_ 1785045206151725056
author Bozzo, Isabella
Kooner, Paul
Nelson, Ralph
Marwan, Yousef
Paruthikunnan, Samir
Laverdière, Carl
Boily, Mathieu
Martineau, Paul A.
author_facet Bozzo, Isabella
Kooner, Paul
Nelson, Ralph
Marwan, Yousef
Paruthikunnan, Samir
Laverdière, Carl
Boily, Mathieu
Martineau, Paul A.
author_sort Bozzo, Isabella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimation of bone loss may be decreased. PURPOSE: To derive a simple equation to calculate the surface area of the bony fragment in Bankart fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 26 patients suspected of having clinically significant bone loss underwent computed tomography imaging preoperatively, and the percentage of glenoid bone loss (%BL) was approximated with imaging software using a freehand region of interest area measurement with and without the inclusion of the bony Bankart fragment. By assuming this bony fragment as a hemi-ellipse with height, H, and thickness, d, we represented the surface are of the bony piece ( [Formula: see text] ), and subtracted it from the overall %BL. They compared this value with the one found using imaging software. RESULTS: Without the inclusion of the bony Bankart, the overall %BL by the standard true-fit circle measured using imaging software was 23.8% ± 9.7%. When including the bony Bankart, the glenoid %BL measured using imaging software was found to be 12.1% ± 8.5%. The %BL calculated by our equation with the bony Bankart included was 10% ± 11.1%. There was no statistically significant difference between the %BL values measured using the equation and the imaging software (P = .46). CONCLUSION: Using a simple equation that approximates the bony Bankart fragment as a hemiellipse allowed for estimation of the glenoid bone loss, assuming that the fragment can be reduced and adequately fixed. This method may serve as a helpful tool in preoperative planning when there are considerations for incorporating the bony fragment in the repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102011392023-05-23 Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss Bozzo, Isabella Kooner, Paul Nelson, Ralph Marwan, Yousef Paruthikunnan, Samir Laverdière, Carl Boily, Mathieu Martineau, Paul A. Orthop J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimation of bone loss may be decreased. PURPOSE: To derive a simple equation to calculate the surface area of the bony fragment in Bankart fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 26 patients suspected of having clinically significant bone loss underwent computed tomography imaging preoperatively, and the percentage of glenoid bone loss (%BL) was approximated with imaging software using a freehand region of interest area measurement with and without the inclusion of the bony Bankart fragment. By assuming this bony fragment as a hemi-ellipse with height, H, and thickness, d, we represented the surface are of the bony piece ( [Formula: see text] ), and subtracted it from the overall %BL. They compared this value with the one found using imaging software. RESULTS: Without the inclusion of the bony Bankart, the overall %BL by the standard true-fit circle measured using imaging software was 23.8% ± 9.7%. When including the bony Bankart, the glenoid %BL measured using imaging software was found to be 12.1% ± 8.5%. The %BL calculated by our equation with the bony Bankart included was 10% ± 11.1%. There was no statistically significant difference between the %BL values measured using the equation and the imaging software (P = .46). CONCLUSION: Using a simple equation that approximates the bony Bankart fragment as a hemiellipse allowed for estimation of the glenoid bone loss, assuming that the fragment can be reduced and adequately fixed. This method may serve as a helpful tool in preoperative planning when there are considerations for incorporating the bony fragment in the repair. SAGE Publications 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10201139/ /pubmed/37223075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168879 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bozzo, Isabella
Kooner, Paul
Nelson, Ralph
Marwan, Yousef
Paruthikunnan, Samir
Laverdière, Carl
Boily, Mathieu
Martineau, Paul A.
Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
title Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
title_full Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
title_fullStr Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
title_short Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
title_sort contribution of the bony bankart in calculating glenoid bone loss
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168879
work_keys_str_mv AT bozzoisabella contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT koonerpaul contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT nelsonralph contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT marwanyousef contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT paruthikunnansamir contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT laverdierecarl contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT boilymathieu contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss
AT martineaupaula contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss