Cargando…
Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss
BACKGROUND: Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168879 |
_version_ | 1785045206151725056 |
---|---|
author | Bozzo, Isabella Kooner, Paul Nelson, Ralph Marwan, Yousef Paruthikunnan, Samir Laverdière, Carl Boily, Mathieu Martineau, Paul A. |
author_facet | Bozzo, Isabella Kooner, Paul Nelson, Ralph Marwan, Yousef Paruthikunnan, Samir Laverdière, Carl Boily, Mathieu Martineau, Paul A. |
author_sort | Bozzo, Isabella |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimation of bone loss may be decreased. PURPOSE: To derive a simple equation to calculate the surface area of the bony fragment in Bankart fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 26 patients suspected of having clinically significant bone loss underwent computed tomography imaging preoperatively, and the percentage of glenoid bone loss (%BL) was approximated with imaging software using a freehand region of interest area measurement with and without the inclusion of the bony Bankart fragment. By assuming this bony fragment as a hemi-ellipse with height, H, and thickness, d, we represented the surface are of the bony piece ( [Formula: see text] ), and subtracted it from the overall %BL. They compared this value with the one found using imaging software. RESULTS: Without the inclusion of the bony Bankart, the overall %BL by the standard true-fit circle measured using imaging software was 23.8% ± 9.7%. When including the bony Bankart, the glenoid %BL measured using imaging software was found to be 12.1% ± 8.5%. The %BL calculated by our equation with the bony Bankart included was 10% ± 11.1%. There was no statistically significant difference between the %BL values measured using the equation and the imaging software (P = .46). CONCLUSION: Using a simple equation that approximates the bony Bankart fragment as a hemiellipse allowed for estimation of the glenoid bone loss, assuming that the fragment can be reduced and adequately fixed. This method may serve as a helpful tool in preoperative planning when there are considerations for incorporating the bony fragment in the repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10201139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102011392023-05-23 Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss Bozzo, Isabella Kooner, Paul Nelson, Ralph Marwan, Yousef Paruthikunnan, Samir Laverdière, Carl Boily, Mathieu Martineau, Paul A. Orthop J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimation of bone loss may be decreased. PURPOSE: To derive a simple equation to calculate the surface area of the bony fragment in Bankart fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 26 patients suspected of having clinically significant bone loss underwent computed tomography imaging preoperatively, and the percentage of glenoid bone loss (%BL) was approximated with imaging software using a freehand region of interest area measurement with and without the inclusion of the bony Bankart fragment. By assuming this bony fragment as a hemi-ellipse with height, H, and thickness, d, we represented the surface are of the bony piece ( [Formula: see text] ), and subtracted it from the overall %BL. They compared this value with the one found using imaging software. RESULTS: Without the inclusion of the bony Bankart, the overall %BL by the standard true-fit circle measured using imaging software was 23.8% ± 9.7%. When including the bony Bankart, the glenoid %BL measured using imaging software was found to be 12.1% ± 8.5%. The %BL calculated by our equation with the bony Bankart included was 10% ± 11.1%. There was no statistically significant difference between the %BL values measured using the equation and the imaging software (P = .46). CONCLUSION: Using a simple equation that approximates the bony Bankart fragment as a hemiellipse allowed for estimation of the glenoid bone loss, assuming that the fragment can be reduced and adequately fixed. This method may serve as a helpful tool in preoperative planning when there are considerations for incorporating the bony fragment in the repair. SAGE Publications 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10201139/ /pubmed/37223075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168879 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bozzo, Isabella Kooner, Paul Nelson, Ralph Marwan, Yousef Paruthikunnan, Samir Laverdière, Carl Boily, Mathieu Martineau, Paul A. Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss |
title | Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone
Loss |
title_full | Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone
Loss |
title_fullStr | Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone
Loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone
Loss |
title_short | Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone
Loss |
title_sort | contribution of the bony bankart in calculating glenoid bone
loss |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bozzoisabella contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT koonerpaul contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT nelsonralph contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT marwanyousef contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT paruthikunnansamir contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT laverdierecarl contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT boilymathieu contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss AT martineaupaula contributionofthebonybankartincalculatingglenoidboneloss |