Cargando…

THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study

An accurate cannabis breathalyzer based on quantitation of the psychoactive cannabinoid Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) could be an important tool for deterring impaired driving. Such a device does not exist. Simply translating what is known about alcohol breathalyzers is insufficient because ethano...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeerage, Kavita M, Beuning, Cheryle N, Friss, Adam J, Bidwell, L Cinnamon, Lovestead, Tara M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37211879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/acd410
_version_ 1785045213358587904
author Jeerage, Kavita M
Beuning, Cheryle N
Friss, Adam J
Bidwell, L Cinnamon
Lovestead, Tara M
author_facet Jeerage, Kavita M
Beuning, Cheryle N
Friss, Adam J
Bidwell, L Cinnamon
Lovestead, Tara M
author_sort Jeerage, Kavita M
collection PubMed
description An accurate cannabis breathalyzer based on quantitation of the psychoactive cannabinoid Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) could be an important tool for deterring impaired driving. Such a device does not exist. Simply translating what is known about alcohol breathalyzers is insufficient because ethanol is detected as a vapor. THC has extremely low volatility and is hypothesized to be carried in breath by aerosol particles formed from lung surfactant. Exhaled breath aerosols can be recovered from electrostatic filter devices, but consistent quantitative results across multiple studies have not been demonstrated. We used a simple-to-use impaction filter device to collect breath aerosols from participants before and after they smoked a legal market cannabis flower containing ∼25% Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid. Breath collection occurred at an intake session (baseline-intake) and four weeks later in a federally-compliant mobile laboratory 15 min before (baseline-experimental) and 1 h after cannabis use (post-use). Cannabis use was in the participant’s residence. Participants were asked to follow a breathing maneuver designed to increase aerosol production. Breath extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry with multiple reaction monitoring of two transitions for analytes and their deuterated internal standards. Over more than 1 yr, 42 breath samples from 18 participants were collected and analyzed in six batches. THC was quantified in 31% of baseline-intake, 36% of baseline-experimental, and 80% of 1 h post-use breath extracts. The quantities observed 1 h post-use are compared to those reported in six other pilot studies that sampled breath at known intervals following cannabis use and are discussed with respect to participant characteristics and breath sampling protocols. Larger studies with verified abstinence and more post-use timepoints are necessary to generate statistically significant data to develop meaningful cannabis breathalyzer technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102011712023-05-23 THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study Jeerage, Kavita M Beuning, Cheryle N Friss, Adam J Bidwell, L Cinnamon Lovestead, Tara M J Breath Res Paper An accurate cannabis breathalyzer based on quantitation of the psychoactive cannabinoid Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) could be an important tool for deterring impaired driving. Such a device does not exist. Simply translating what is known about alcohol breathalyzers is insufficient because ethanol is detected as a vapor. THC has extremely low volatility and is hypothesized to be carried in breath by aerosol particles formed from lung surfactant. Exhaled breath aerosols can be recovered from electrostatic filter devices, but consistent quantitative results across multiple studies have not been demonstrated. We used a simple-to-use impaction filter device to collect breath aerosols from participants before and after they smoked a legal market cannabis flower containing ∼25% Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid. Breath collection occurred at an intake session (baseline-intake) and four weeks later in a federally-compliant mobile laboratory 15 min before (baseline-experimental) and 1 h after cannabis use (post-use). Cannabis use was in the participant’s residence. Participants were asked to follow a breathing maneuver designed to increase aerosol production. Breath extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry with multiple reaction monitoring of two transitions for analytes and their deuterated internal standards. Over more than 1 yr, 42 breath samples from 18 participants were collected and analyzed in six batches. THC was quantified in 31% of baseline-intake, 36% of baseline-experimental, and 80% of 1 h post-use breath extracts. The quantities observed 1 h post-use are compared to those reported in six other pilot studies that sampled breath at known intervals following cannabis use and are discussed with respect to participant characteristics and breath sampling protocols. Larger studies with verified abstinence and more post-use timepoints are necessary to generate statistically significant data to develop meaningful cannabis breathalyzer technology. IOP Publishing 2023-07-01 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10201171/ /pubmed/37211879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/acd410 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Paper
Jeerage, Kavita M
Beuning, Cheryle N
Friss, Adam J
Bidwell, L Cinnamon
Lovestead, Tara M
THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
title THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
title_full THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
title_fullStr THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
title_short THC in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
title_sort thc in breath aerosols collected with an impaction filter device before and after legal-market product inhalation—a pilot study
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37211879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/acd410
work_keys_str_mv AT jeeragekavitam thcinbreathaerosolscollectedwithanimpactionfilterdevicebeforeandafterlegalmarketproductinhalationapilotstudy
AT beuningcherylen thcinbreathaerosolscollectedwithanimpactionfilterdevicebeforeandafterlegalmarketproductinhalationapilotstudy
AT frissadamj thcinbreathaerosolscollectedwithanimpactionfilterdevicebeforeandafterlegalmarketproductinhalationapilotstudy
AT bidwelllcinnamon thcinbreathaerosolscollectedwithanimpactionfilterdevicebeforeandafterlegalmarketproductinhalationapilotstudy
AT lovesteadtaram thcinbreathaerosolscollectedwithanimpactionfilterdevicebeforeandafterlegalmarketproductinhalationapilotstudy