Cargando…

Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions. Design A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Coch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, M Denika C, Perriman, Diana M, Fearon, Angela M, Couldrick, Jacqui M, Scarvell, Jennie M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026
_version_ 1785045222608076800
author Silva, M Denika C
Perriman, Diana M
Fearon, Angela M
Couldrick, Jacqui M
Scarvell, Jennie M
author_facet Silva, M Denika C
Perriman, Diana M
Fearon, Angela M
Couldrick, Jacqui M
Scarvell, Jennie M
author_sort Silva, M Denika C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions. Design A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to 21 September 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that calculated MIC and MID using any calculation method including anchor, consensus and distribution methods, for any knee OA outcome tool after non-surgical interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted reported MIC, MID and minimum detectable change (MDC) estimates. We used quality assessment tools appropriate to the studies’ methods to screen out low-quality studies. Values were combined to produce a median and range, for each method. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were eligible (anchor-k=12, consensus-k=1 and distribution-k=35). MIC values for 13 outcome tools including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)-function were estimated using 5 high-quality anchor studies. MID values for 23 tools including KOOS-pain, ADL, QOL and WOMAC-function, stiffness and total were estimated using 6 high-quality anchor studies. One moderate quality consensus study reported MIC for pain, function and global assessment. MDC values from distribution method estimates for 126 tools including KOOS-QOL and WOMAC-total were estimated using 38 good-to-fair-quality studies. CONCLUSION: Median MIC, MID and MDC estimates were reported for outcome tools in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions. The results of this review clarify the current understanding of MIC, MID and MDC in the knee OA population. However, some estimates suggest considerable heterogeneity and require careful interpretation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020215952.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102012312023-05-23 Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review Silva, M Denika C Perriman, Diana M Fearon, Angela M Couldrick, Jacqui M Scarvell, Jennie M BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions. Design A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to 21 September 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that calculated MIC and MID using any calculation method including anchor, consensus and distribution methods, for any knee OA outcome tool after non-surgical interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted reported MIC, MID and minimum detectable change (MDC) estimates. We used quality assessment tools appropriate to the studies’ methods to screen out low-quality studies. Values were combined to produce a median and range, for each method. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were eligible (anchor-k=12, consensus-k=1 and distribution-k=35). MIC values for 13 outcome tools including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)-function were estimated using 5 high-quality anchor studies. MID values for 23 tools including KOOS-pain, ADL, QOL and WOMAC-function, stiffness and total were estimated using 6 high-quality anchor studies. One moderate quality consensus study reported MIC for pain, function and global assessment. MDC values from distribution method estimates for 126 tools including KOOS-QOL and WOMAC-total were estimated using 38 good-to-fair-quality studies. CONCLUSION: Median MIC, MID and MDC estimates were reported for outcome tools in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions. The results of this review clarify the current understanding of MIC, MID and MDC in the knee OA population. However, some estimates suggest considerable heterogeneity and require careful interpretation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020215952. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10201231/ /pubmed/37202126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Silva, M Denika C
Perriman, Diana M
Fearon, Angela M
Couldrick, Jacqui M
Scarvell, Jennie M
Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
title Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
title_full Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
title_fullStr Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
title_short Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
title_sort minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026
work_keys_str_mv AT silvamdenikac minimalimportantchangeanddifferenceforkneeosteoarthritisoutcomemeasurementtoolsafternonsurgicalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT perrimandianam minimalimportantchangeanddifferenceforkneeosteoarthritisoutcomemeasurementtoolsafternonsurgicalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT fearonangelam minimalimportantchangeanddifferenceforkneeosteoarthritisoutcomemeasurementtoolsafternonsurgicalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT couldrickjacquim minimalimportantchangeanddifferenceforkneeosteoarthritisoutcomemeasurementtoolsafternonsurgicalinterventionsasystematicreview
AT scarvelljenniem minimalimportantchangeanddifferenceforkneeosteoarthritisoutcomemeasurementtoolsafternonsurgicalinterventionsasystematicreview