Cargando…
Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often suffer from hearing loss, in most cases undiagnosed or inappropriately treated. The implementation of a programme of systematic hearing screening, diagnostics, therapy initiation or allocation and long-term monitoring within the liv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070259 |
_version_ | 1785045229443743744 |
---|---|
author | Schwarze, Katharina Mathmann, Philipp Schäfer, Karolin Brannath, Werner Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik Altin, Sibel Prein, Lukas Naghipour, Awa Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie Wasmuth, Susanne Kanaan, Oliver am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette Schwalen, Anna Sophia Schotenröhr, Anna Scharpenberg, Martin Schlierenkamp, Sarah Stuhrmann, Nicole Lang-Roth, Ruth Demir, Muhittin Diekmann, Sandra Neumann, Anja Gietmann, Corinna Neumann, Katrin |
author_facet | Schwarze, Katharina Mathmann, Philipp Schäfer, Karolin Brannath, Werner Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik Altin, Sibel Prein, Lukas Naghipour, Awa Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie Wasmuth, Susanne Kanaan, Oliver am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette Schwalen, Anna Sophia Schotenröhr, Anna Scharpenberg, Martin Schlierenkamp, Sarah Stuhrmann, Nicole Lang-Roth, Ruth Demir, Muhittin Diekmann, Sandra Neumann, Anja Gietmann, Corinna Neumann, Katrin |
author_sort | Schwarze, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often suffer from hearing loss, in most cases undiagnosed or inappropriately treated. The implementation of a programme of systematic hearing screening, diagnostics, therapy initiation or allocation and long-term monitoring within the living environments of individuals with ID (nurseries, schools, workshops, homes), therefore, seems beneficial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study aims to assess the effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold screening programme for individuals with ID. Within this programme 1050 individuals with ID of all ages will undergo hearing screening and an immediate reference diagnosis in their living environment (outreach cohort). The recruitment of participants in the outreach group will take place within 158 institutions, for example, schools, kindergartens and places of living or work. If an individual fails the screening assessment, subsequent full audiometric diagnostics will follow and, if hearing loss is confirmed, initiation of therapy or referral to and monitoring of such therapy. A control cohort of 141 participants will receive an invitation from their health insurance provider via their family for the same procedure but within a clinic (clinical cohort). A second screening measurement will be performed with both cohorts 1 year later and the previous therapy outcome will be checked. It is hypothesised that this programme leads to a relevant reduction in the number of untreated or inadequately treated cases of hearing loss and strengthens the communication skills of the newly or better-treated individuals. Secondary outcomes include the age-dependent prevalence of hearing loss in individuals with ID, the costs associated with this programme, cost of illness before-and-after enrolment and modelling of the programme’s cost-effectiveness compared with regular care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster (No. 2020-843 f-S). Participants or guardians will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024804. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10201260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102012602023-05-23 Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study Schwarze, Katharina Mathmann, Philipp Schäfer, Karolin Brannath, Werner Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik Altin, Sibel Prein, Lukas Naghipour, Awa Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie Wasmuth, Susanne Kanaan, Oliver am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette Schwalen, Anna Sophia Schotenröhr, Anna Scharpenberg, Martin Schlierenkamp, Sarah Stuhrmann, Nicole Lang-Roth, Ruth Demir, Muhittin Diekmann, Sandra Neumann, Anja Gietmann, Corinna Neumann, Katrin BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often suffer from hearing loss, in most cases undiagnosed or inappropriately treated. The implementation of a programme of systematic hearing screening, diagnostics, therapy initiation or allocation and long-term monitoring within the living environments of individuals with ID (nurseries, schools, workshops, homes), therefore, seems beneficial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study aims to assess the effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold screening programme for individuals with ID. Within this programme 1050 individuals with ID of all ages will undergo hearing screening and an immediate reference diagnosis in their living environment (outreach cohort). The recruitment of participants in the outreach group will take place within 158 institutions, for example, schools, kindergartens and places of living or work. If an individual fails the screening assessment, subsequent full audiometric diagnostics will follow and, if hearing loss is confirmed, initiation of therapy or referral to and monitoring of such therapy. A control cohort of 141 participants will receive an invitation from their health insurance provider via their family for the same procedure but within a clinic (clinical cohort). A second screening measurement will be performed with both cohorts 1 year later and the previous therapy outcome will be checked. It is hypothesised that this programme leads to a relevant reduction in the number of untreated or inadequately treated cases of hearing loss and strengthens the communication skills of the newly or better-treated individuals. Secondary outcomes include the age-dependent prevalence of hearing loss in individuals with ID, the costs associated with this programme, cost of illness before-and-after enrolment and modelling of the programme’s cost-effectiveness compared with regular care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster (No. 2020-843 f-S). Participants or guardians will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024804. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10201260/ /pubmed/37202136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070259 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology Schwarze, Katharina Mathmann, Philipp Schäfer, Karolin Brannath, Werner Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik Altin, Sibel Prein, Lukas Naghipour, Awa Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie Wasmuth, Susanne Kanaan, Oliver am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette Schwalen, Anna Sophia Schotenröhr, Anna Scharpenberg, Martin Schlierenkamp, Sarah Stuhrmann, Nicole Lang-Roth, Ruth Demir, Muhittin Diekmann, Sandra Neumann, Anja Gietmann, Corinna Neumann, Katrin Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
title | Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
title_full | Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
title_short | Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
title_sort | effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (hörgeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study |
topic | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwarzekatharina effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT mathmannphilipp effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT schaferkarolin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT brannathwerner effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT hohnephilliphendrik effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT altinsibel effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT preinlukas effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT naghipourawa effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT zielonkowskisusannamarie effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT wasmuthsusanne effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT kanaanoliver effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT amzehnhoffdinnesenantoinette effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT schwalenannasophia effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT schotenrohranna effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT scharpenbergmartin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT schlierenkampsarah effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT stuhrmannnicole effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT langrothruth effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT demirmuhittin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT diekmannsandra effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT neumannanja effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT gietmanncorinna effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy AT neumannkatrin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy |