Cargando…

Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often suffer from hearing loss, in most cases undiagnosed or inappropriately treated. The implementation of a programme of systematic hearing screening, diagnostics, therapy initiation or allocation and long-term monitoring within the liv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarze, Katharina, Mathmann, Philipp, Schäfer, Karolin, Brannath, Werner, Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik, Altin, Sibel, Prein, Lukas, Naghipour, Awa, Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie, Wasmuth, Susanne, Kanaan, Oliver, am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette, Schwalen, Anna Sophia, Schotenröhr, Anna, Scharpenberg, Martin, Schlierenkamp, Sarah, Stuhrmann, Nicole, Lang-Roth, Ruth, Demir, Muhittin, Diekmann, Sandra, Neumann, Anja, Gietmann, Corinna, Neumann, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070259
_version_ 1785045229443743744
author Schwarze, Katharina
Mathmann, Philipp
Schäfer, Karolin
Brannath, Werner
Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik
Altin, Sibel
Prein, Lukas
Naghipour, Awa
Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie
Wasmuth, Susanne
Kanaan, Oliver
am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette
Schwalen, Anna Sophia
Schotenröhr, Anna
Scharpenberg, Martin
Schlierenkamp, Sarah
Stuhrmann, Nicole
Lang-Roth, Ruth
Demir, Muhittin
Diekmann, Sandra
Neumann, Anja
Gietmann, Corinna
Neumann, Katrin
author_facet Schwarze, Katharina
Mathmann, Philipp
Schäfer, Karolin
Brannath, Werner
Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik
Altin, Sibel
Prein, Lukas
Naghipour, Awa
Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie
Wasmuth, Susanne
Kanaan, Oliver
am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette
Schwalen, Anna Sophia
Schotenröhr, Anna
Scharpenberg, Martin
Schlierenkamp, Sarah
Stuhrmann, Nicole
Lang-Roth, Ruth
Demir, Muhittin
Diekmann, Sandra
Neumann, Anja
Gietmann, Corinna
Neumann, Katrin
author_sort Schwarze, Katharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often suffer from hearing loss, in most cases undiagnosed or inappropriately treated. The implementation of a programme of systematic hearing screening, diagnostics, therapy initiation or allocation and long-term monitoring within the living environments of individuals with ID (nurseries, schools, workshops, homes), therefore, seems beneficial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study aims to assess the effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold screening programme for individuals with ID. Within this programme 1050 individuals with ID of all ages will undergo hearing screening and an immediate reference diagnosis in their living environment (outreach cohort). The recruitment of participants in the outreach group will take place within 158 institutions, for example, schools, kindergartens and places of living or work. If an individual fails the screening assessment, subsequent full audiometric diagnostics will follow and, if hearing loss is confirmed, initiation of therapy or referral to and monitoring of such therapy. A control cohort of 141 participants will receive an invitation from their health insurance provider via their family for the same procedure but within a clinic (clinical cohort). A second screening measurement will be performed with both cohorts 1 year later and the previous therapy outcome will be checked. It is hypothesised that this programme leads to a relevant reduction in the number of untreated or inadequately treated cases of hearing loss and strengthens the communication skills of the newly or better-treated individuals. Secondary outcomes include the age-dependent prevalence of hearing loss in individuals with ID, the costs associated with this programme, cost of illness before-and-after enrolment and modelling of the programme’s cost-effectiveness compared with regular care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster (No. 2020-843 f-S). Participants or guardians will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024804.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102012602023-05-23 Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study Schwarze, Katharina Mathmann, Philipp Schäfer, Karolin Brannath, Werner Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik Altin, Sibel Prein, Lukas Naghipour, Awa Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie Wasmuth, Susanne Kanaan, Oliver am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette Schwalen, Anna Sophia Schotenröhr, Anna Scharpenberg, Martin Schlierenkamp, Sarah Stuhrmann, Nicole Lang-Roth, Ruth Demir, Muhittin Diekmann, Sandra Neumann, Anja Gietmann, Corinna Neumann, Katrin BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often suffer from hearing loss, in most cases undiagnosed or inappropriately treated. The implementation of a programme of systematic hearing screening, diagnostics, therapy initiation or allocation and long-term monitoring within the living environments of individuals with ID (nurseries, schools, workshops, homes), therefore, seems beneficial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study aims to assess the effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold screening programme for individuals with ID. Within this programme 1050 individuals with ID of all ages will undergo hearing screening and an immediate reference diagnosis in their living environment (outreach cohort). The recruitment of participants in the outreach group will take place within 158 institutions, for example, schools, kindergartens and places of living or work. If an individual fails the screening assessment, subsequent full audiometric diagnostics will follow and, if hearing loss is confirmed, initiation of therapy or referral to and monitoring of such therapy. A control cohort of 141 participants will receive an invitation from their health insurance provider via their family for the same procedure but within a clinic (clinical cohort). A second screening measurement will be performed with both cohorts 1 year later and the previous therapy outcome will be checked. It is hypothesised that this programme leads to a relevant reduction in the number of untreated or inadequately treated cases of hearing loss and strengthens the communication skills of the newly or better-treated individuals. Secondary outcomes include the age-dependent prevalence of hearing loss in individuals with ID, the costs associated with this programme, cost of illness before-and-after enrolment and modelling of the programme’s cost-effectiveness compared with regular care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster (No. 2020-843 f-S). Participants or guardians will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024804. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10201260/ /pubmed/37202136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070259 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Schwarze, Katharina
Mathmann, Philipp
Schäfer, Karolin
Brannath, Werner
Höhne, Phillip-Hendrik
Altin, Sibel
Prein, Lukas
Naghipour, Awa
Zielonkowski, Susanna Marie
Wasmuth, Susanne
Kanaan, Oliver
am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette
Schwalen, Anna Sophia
Schotenröhr, Anna
Scharpenberg, Martin
Schlierenkamp, Sarah
Stuhrmann, Nicole
Lang-Roth, Ruth
Demir, Muhittin
Diekmann, Sandra
Neumann, Anja
Gietmann, Corinna
Neumann, Katrin
Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
title Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
title_full Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
title_fullStr Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
title_short Effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (HörGeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
title_sort effectiveness and costs of a low-threshold hearing screening programme (hörgeist) for individuals with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a screening study
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070259
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarzekatharina effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT mathmannphilipp effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT schaferkarolin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT brannathwerner effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT hohnephilliphendrik effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT altinsibel effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT preinlukas effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT naghipourawa effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT zielonkowskisusannamarie effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT wasmuthsusanne effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT kanaanoliver effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT amzehnhoffdinnesenantoinette effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT schwalenannasophia effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT schotenrohranna effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT scharpenbergmartin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT schlierenkampsarah effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT stuhrmannnicole effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT langrothruth effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT demirmuhittin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT diekmannsandra effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT neumannanja effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT gietmanncorinna effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy
AT neumannkatrin effectivenessandcostsofalowthresholdhearingscreeningprogrammehorgeistforindividualswithintellectualdisabilitiesprotocolforascreeningstudy