Cargando…

Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool

INTRODUCTION: Screening can reduce deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite high levels of public enthusiasm, participation rates in population CRC screening programmes internationally remain persistently below target levels. Simple behavioural interventions such as completion goals and planning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robb, Kathyrn A, Kotzur, Marie, Young, Ben, McCowan, Colin, Hollands, Gareth J, Irvine, Audrey, Macdonald, Sara, McConnachie, Alex, O'Carroll, Ronan E, O'Connor, Rory C, Steele, Robert J C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066136
_version_ 1785045231800942592
author Robb, Kathyrn A
Kotzur, Marie
Young, Ben
McCowan, Colin
Hollands, Gareth J
Irvine, Audrey
Macdonald, Sara
McConnachie, Alex
O'Carroll, Ronan E
O'Connor, Rory C
Steele, Robert J C
author_facet Robb, Kathyrn A
Kotzur, Marie
Young, Ben
McCowan, Colin
Hollands, Gareth J
Irvine, Audrey
Macdonald, Sara
McConnachie, Alex
O'Carroll, Ronan E
O'Connor, Rory C
Steele, Robert J C
author_sort Robb, Kathyrn A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Screening can reduce deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite high levels of public enthusiasm, participation rates in population CRC screening programmes internationally remain persistently below target levels. Simple behavioural interventions such as completion goals and planning tools may support participation among those inclined to be screened but who fail to act on their intentions. This study aims to evaluate the impact of: (a) a suggested deadline for return of the test; (b) a planning tool and (c) the combination of a deadline and planning tool on return of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for CRC screening. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled trial of 40 000 adults invited to participate in the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme will assess the individual and combined impact of the interventions. Trial delivery will be integrated into the existing CRC screening process. The Scottish Bowel Screening Programme mails FITs to people aged 50–74 with brief instructions for completion and return. Participants will be randomised to one of eight groups: (1) no intervention; (2) suggested deadline (1 week); (3) suggested deadline (2 weeks); (4) suggested deadline (4 weeks); (5) planning tool; (6) planning tool plus suggested deadline (1 week); (7) planning tool plus suggested deadline (2 weeks); (8) planning tool plus suggested deadline (4 weeks). The primary outcome is return of the correctly completed FIT at 3 months. To understand the cognitive and behavioural mechanisms and to explore the acceptability of both interventions, we will survey (n=2000) and interview (n=40) a subgroup of trial participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the National Health Service South Central—Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (ref. 19/SC/0369). The findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Participants can request a summary of the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.govNCT05408169
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102012712023-05-23 Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool Robb, Kathyrn A Kotzur, Marie Young, Ben McCowan, Colin Hollands, Gareth J Irvine, Audrey Macdonald, Sara McConnachie, Alex O'Carroll, Ronan E O'Connor, Rory C Steele, Robert J C BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Screening can reduce deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite high levels of public enthusiasm, participation rates in population CRC screening programmes internationally remain persistently below target levels. Simple behavioural interventions such as completion goals and planning tools may support participation among those inclined to be screened but who fail to act on their intentions. This study aims to evaluate the impact of: (a) a suggested deadline for return of the test; (b) a planning tool and (c) the combination of a deadline and planning tool on return of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for CRC screening. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled trial of 40 000 adults invited to participate in the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme will assess the individual and combined impact of the interventions. Trial delivery will be integrated into the existing CRC screening process. The Scottish Bowel Screening Programme mails FITs to people aged 50–74 with brief instructions for completion and return. Participants will be randomised to one of eight groups: (1) no intervention; (2) suggested deadline (1 week); (3) suggested deadline (2 weeks); (4) suggested deadline (4 weeks); (5) planning tool; (6) planning tool plus suggested deadline (1 week); (7) planning tool plus suggested deadline (2 weeks); (8) planning tool plus suggested deadline (4 weeks). The primary outcome is return of the correctly completed FIT at 3 months. To understand the cognitive and behavioural mechanisms and to explore the acceptability of both interventions, we will survey (n=2000) and interview (n=40) a subgroup of trial participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the National Health Service South Central—Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (ref. 19/SC/0369). The findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Participants can request a summary of the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.govNCT05408169 BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10201271/ /pubmed/37202130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066136 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Robb, Kathyrn A
Kotzur, Marie
Young, Ben
McCowan, Colin
Hollands, Gareth J
Irvine, Audrey
Macdonald, Sara
McConnachie, Alex
O'Carroll, Ronan E
O'Connor, Rory C
Steele, Robert J C
Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
title Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
title_full Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
title_fullStr Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
title_full_unstemmed Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
title_short Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
title_sort increasing uptake of fit colorectal screening: protocol for the tempo randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066136
work_keys_str_mv AT robbkathyrna increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT kotzurmarie increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT youngben increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT mccowancolin increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT hollandsgarethj increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT irvineaudrey increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT macdonaldsara increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT mcconnachiealex increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT ocarrollronane increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT oconnorroryc increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool
AT steelerobertjc increasinguptakeoffitcolorectalscreeningprotocolforthetemporandomisedcontrolledtrialtestingasuggesteddeadlineandaplanningtool