Cargando…
Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
[Image: see text] The automated exploration and identification of minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) is a valuable computational strategy for the study of photochemical processes. Due to the immense computational effort involved in calculating non-adiabatic derivative coupling vectors, sim...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00494 |
_version_ | 1785045284109156352 |
---|---|
author | Pracht, Philipp Bannwarth, Christoph |
author_facet | Pracht, Philipp Bannwarth, Christoph |
author_sort | Pracht, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The automated exploration and identification of minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) is a valuable computational strategy for the study of photochemical processes. Due to the immense computational effort involved in calculating non-adiabatic derivative coupling vectors, simplifications have been introduced focusing instead on minimum energy crossing points (MECPs), where promising attempts were made with semiempirical quantum mechanical methods. A simplified treatment for describing crossing points between almost arbitrary diabatic states based on a non-self-consistent extended tight-binding method, GFN0-xTB, is presented. Involving only a single diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, the method can provide energies and gradients for multiple electronic states, which can be used in a derivative coupling-vector-free scheme to calculate MECPs. By comparison with high-lying MECIs of benchmark systems, it is demonstrated that the identified geometries are good starting points for further MECI refinement with ab initio methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10201533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102015332023-05-23 Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods Pracht, Philipp Bannwarth, Christoph J Phys Chem Lett [Image: see text] The automated exploration and identification of minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) is a valuable computational strategy for the study of photochemical processes. Due to the immense computational effort involved in calculating non-adiabatic derivative coupling vectors, simplifications have been introduced focusing instead on minimum energy crossing points (MECPs), where promising attempts were made with semiempirical quantum mechanical methods. A simplified treatment for describing crossing points between almost arbitrary diabatic states based on a non-self-consistent extended tight-binding method, GFN0-xTB, is presented. Involving only a single diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, the method can provide energies and gradients for multiple electronic states, which can be used in a derivative coupling-vector-free scheme to calculate MECPs. By comparison with high-lying MECIs of benchmark systems, it is demonstrated that the identified geometries are good starting points for further MECI refinement with ab initio methods. American Chemical Society 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10201533/ /pubmed/37144783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00494 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Pracht, Philipp Bannwarth, Christoph Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods |
title | Finding Excited-State
Minimum Energy Crossing Points
on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods |
title_full | Finding Excited-State
Minimum Energy Crossing Points
on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods |
title_fullStr | Finding Excited-State
Minimum Energy Crossing Points
on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Finding Excited-State
Minimum Energy Crossing Points
on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods |
title_short | Finding Excited-State
Minimum Energy Crossing Points
on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods |
title_sort | finding excited-state
minimum energy crossing points
on a budget: non-self-consistent tight-binding methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prachtphilipp findingexcitedstateminimumenergycrossingpointsonabudgetnonselfconsistenttightbindingmethods AT bannwarthchristoph findingexcitedstateminimumenergycrossingpointsonabudgetnonselfconsistenttightbindingmethods |