Cargando…

Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods

[Image: see text] The automated exploration and identification of minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) is a valuable computational strategy for the study of photochemical processes. Due to the immense computational effort involved in calculating non-adiabatic derivative coupling vectors, sim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pracht, Philipp, Bannwarth, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00494
_version_ 1785045284109156352
author Pracht, Philipp
Bannwarth, Christoph
author_facet Pracht, Philipp
Bannwarth, Christoph
author_sort Pracht, Philipp
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The automated exploration and identification of minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) is a valuable computational strategy for the study of photochemical processes. Due to the immense computational effort involved in calculating non-adiabatic derivative coupling vectors, simplifications have been introduced focusing instead on minimum energy crossing points (MECPs), where promising attempts were made with semiempirical quantum mechanical methods. A simplified treatment for describing crossing points between almost arbitrary diabatic states based on a non-self-consistent extended tight-binding method, GFN0-xTB, is presented. Involving only a single diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, the method can provide energies and gradients for multiple electronic states, which can be used in a derivative coupling-vector-free scheme to calculate MECPs. By comparison with high-lying MECIs of benchmark systems, it is demonstrated that the identified geometries are good starting points for further MECI refinement with ab initio methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102015332023-05-23 Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods Pracht, Philipp Bannwarth, Christoph J Phys Chem Lett [Image: see text] The automated exploration and identification of minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) is a valuable computational strategy for the study of photochemical processes. Due to the immense computational effort involved in calculating non-adiabatic derivative coupling vectors, simplifications have been introduced focusing instead on minimum energy crossing points (MECPs), where promising attempts were made with semiempirical quantum mechanical methods. A simplified treatment for describing crossing points between almost arbitrary diabatic states based on a non-self-consistent extended tight-binding method, GFN0-xTB, is presented. Involving only a single diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, the method can provide energies and gradients for multiple electronic states, which can be used in a derivative coupling-vector-free scheme to calculate MECPs. By comparison with high-lying MECIs of benchmark systems, it is demonstrated that the identified geometries are good starting points for further MECI refinement with ab initio methods. American Chemical Society 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10201533/ /pubmed/37144783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00494 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Pracht, Philipp
Bannwarth, Christoph
Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
title Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
title_full Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
title_fullStr Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
title_full_unstemmed Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
title_short Finding Excited-State Minimum Energy Crossing Points on a Budget: Non-Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Methods
title_sort finding excited-state minimum energy crossing points on a budget: non-self-consistent tight-binding methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00494
work_keys_str_mv AT prachtphilipp findingexcitedstateminimumenergycrossingpointsonabudgetnonselfconsistenttightbindingmethods
AT bannwarthchristoph findingexcitedstateminimumenergycrossingpointsonabudgetnonselfconsistenttightbindingmethods