Cargando…

Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?

Because of the production of nutrient-deficient infant formulas (IFs), the United States Congress passed regulations on the composition and production of IF, referred to as the Infant Formula Act (IFA), in 1980, which was amended in 1986. More detailed FDA rules have been created since then, specify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrams, Steven A., Bergner, Erynn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Nutrition 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36878358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.006
_version_ 1785045300089454592
author Abrams, Steven A.
Bergner, Erynn M.
author_facet Abrams, Steven A.
Bergner, Erynn M.
author_sort Abrams, Steven A.
collection PubMed
description Because of the production of nutrient-deficient infant formulas (IFs), the United States Congress passed regulations on the composition and production of IF, referred to as the Infant Formula Act (IFA), in 1980, which was amended in 1986. More detailed FDA rules have been created since then, specifying the ranges or minimum intakes of nutrients and providing details for the safe production and evaluation of infant formulas. Although generally effective in ensuring safe IF, recent events have made it clear that a re-evaluation of aspects of all the nutrient composition regulations for IF is needed, including consideration of adding requirements related to bioactive nutrients not mentioned in the IFA. We propose that, as principal examples, the requirement for iron content needs to be re-evaluated and that DHA and AA should be considered for addition to the nutrient requirements after scientific review by a panel such as those established by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Additionally, there is no specific requirement in current FDA regulations for the energy density of IF, and this should be added alongside potential revisions of the protein requirement. It would also be ideal to have specific FDA rules on nutrient intakes for premature infants as these are exempted from the specific nutrient regulations of the amended IFA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10201656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102016562023-05-23 Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980? Abrams, Steven A. Bergner, Erynn M. Adv Nutr Perspective Because of the production of nutrient-deficient infant formulas (IFs), the United States Congress passed regulations on the composition and production of IF, referred to as the Infant Formula Act (IFA), in 1980, which was amended in 1986. More detailed FDA rules have been created since then, specifying the ranges or minimum intakes of nutrients and providing details for the safe production and evaluation of infant formulas. Although generally effective in ensuring safe IF, recent events have made it clear that a re-evaluation of aspects of all the nutrient composition regulations for IF is needed, including consideration of adding requirements related to bioactive nutrients not mentioned in the IFA. We propose that, as principal examples, the requirement for iron content needs to be re-evaluated and that DHA and AA should be considered for addition to the nutrient requirements after scientific review by a panel such as those established by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Additionally, there is no specific requirement in current FDA regulations for the energy density of IF, and this should be added alongside potential revisions of the protein requirement. It would also be ideal to have specific FDA rules on nutrient intakes for premature infants as these are exempted from the specific nutrient regulations of the amended IFA. American Society for Nutrition 2023-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10201656/ /pubmed/36878358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.006 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Perspective
Abrams, Steven A.
Bergner, Erynn M.
Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?
title Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?
title_full Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?
title_fullStr Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?
title_full_unstemmed Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?
title_short Perspective: Is It Time to Revise the Current Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas Principally Established in 1980?
title_sort perspective: is it time to revise the current nutrient requirements for infant formulas principally established in 1980?
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36878358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.006
work_keys_str_mv AT abramsstevena perspectiveisittimetorevisethecurrentnutrientrequirementsforinfantformulasprincipallyestablishedin1980
AT bergnererynnm perspectiveisittimetorevisethecurrentnutrientrequirementsforinfantformulasprincipallyestablishedin1980