Cargando…

Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study

AIM: The surface roughness of dental restorations can decrease resin durability, since it leads to its deterioration, color variation, and loss of gloss. Therefore, the aim was to assess the surface roughness of nanoparticle resin composites, subjected to two different polishing systems. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramírez-Vargas, Giovanna Gisella, Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela I, López-Gurreonero, Carlos, Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto, Cachay-Criado, Hernán, Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Adolfo, Cayo-Rojas, César Félix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223443
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_279_21
_version_ 1785045401730023424
author Ramírez-Vargas, Giovanna Gisella
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela I
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cachay-Criado, Hernán
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Adolfo
Cayo-Rojas, César Félix
author_facet Ramírez-Vargas, Giovanna Gisella
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela I
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cachay-Criado, Hernán
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Adolfo
Cayo-Rojas, César Félix
author_sort Ramírez-Vargas, Giovanna Gisella
collection PubMed
description AIM: The surface roughness of dental restorations can decrease resin durability, since it leads to its deterioration, color variation, and loss of gloss. Therefore, the aim was to assess the surface roughness of nanoparticle resin composites, subjected to two different polishing systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal in vitro experimental study consisted of 32 resin specimens made according to ISO 4049-2019 and divided equally into four groups: A1: Palfique LX5 / Sof-Lex, A2: Palfique LX5 / Super Snap, B1: Filtek Z350 XT / Sof-Lex, and B2: Filtek Z350 XT / Super Snap. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Surface roughness was measured with a digital roughness tester, both before and after the polishing procedure. The data were analyzed with the Student’s t-test for related samples, and with the inter-subject ANOVA test with two factors; considering significance at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The surface roughness of Palfique LX5 resin with the Sof-lex system was 0.330 (CI: 0.282–0.378 µm) and 0.170 (CI: 0.087–0.253 µm) before and after polishing, respectively. With the Super Snap system, values of 0.448 (CI: 0.346–0.549 µm) and 0.206 (CI: 0.130–0.282 µm) were obtained before and after polishing, respectively. For the Filtek Z350 XT resin, the surface roughness obtained with the Sof-lex system was 0.353 (CI: 0.278–0.427 µm) and 0.134 (CI: 0.095–0.172 µm) before and after polishing, respectively. With the Super Snap system, values of 0.334 (CI: 0.247–0.421 µm) and 0.171 (CI: 0.122–0.221 µm) were obtained before and after polishing, respectively. Surface roughness did not show significant differences in all groups assessed both before (P = 0.068) and after (P = 0.335) polishing. However, before and after the application of the polishing systems, all groups significantly decreased their surface roughness (P < 0.05). Further, when comparing this decrease among all groups, no significant differences were observed (P = 0.437). CONCLUSION: The surface roughness of the Filtek Z350 XT and Palfique LX5 nanoparticle resin composites showed no significant differences when using the Sof-lex and Super Snap polishing systems. However, both polishing systems significantly decreased the surface roughness of the nanoparticulated resins, with this decrease being similar in all groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10202250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102022502023-05-23 Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study Ramírez-Vargas, Giovanna Gisella Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela I López-Gurreonero, Carlos Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto Cachay-Criado, Hernán Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Adolfo Cayo-Rojas, César Félix J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIM: The surface roughness of dental restorations can decrease resin durability, since it leads to its deterioration, color variation, and loss of gloss. Therefore, the aim was to assess the surface roughness of nanoparticle resin composites, subjected to two different polishing systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal in vitro experimental study consisted of 32 resin specimens made according to ISO 4049-2019 and divided equally into four groups: A1: Palfique LX5 / Sof-Lex, A2: Palfique LX5 / Super Snap, B1: Filtek Z350 XT / Sof-Lex, and B2: Filtek Z350 XT / Super Snap. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Surface roughness was measured with a digital roughness tester, both before and after the polishing procedure. The data were analyzed with the Student’s t-test for related samples, and with the inter-subject ANOVA test with two factors; considering significance at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The surface roughness of Palfique LX5 resin with the Sof-lex system was 0.330 (CI: 0.282–0.378 µm) and 0.170 (CI: 0.087–0.253 µm) before and after polishing, respectively. With the Super Snap system, values of 0.448 (CI: 0.346–0.549 µm) and 0.206 (CI: 0.130–0.282 µm) were obtained before and after polishing, respectively. For the Filtek Z350 XT resin, the surface roughness obtained with the Sof-lex system was 0.353 (CI: 0.278–0.427 µm) and 0.134 (CI: 0.095–0.172 µm) before and after polishing, respectively. With the Super Snap system, values of 0.334 (CI: 0.247–0.421 µm) and 0.171 (CI: 0.122–0.221 µm) were obtained before and after polishing, respectively. Surface roughness did not show significant differences in all groups assessed both before (P = 0.068) and after (P = 0.335) polishing. However, before and after the application of the polishing systems, all groups significantly decreased their surface roughness (P < 0.05). Further, when comparing this decrease among all groups, no significant differences were observed (P = 0.437). CONCLUSION: The surface roughness of the Filtek Z350 XT and Palfique LX5 nanoparticle resin composites showed no significant differences when using the Sof-lex and Super Snap polishing systems. However, both polishing systems significantly decreased the surface roughness of the nanoparticulated resins, with this decrease being similar in all groups. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10202250/ /pubmed/37223443 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_279_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramírez-Vargas, Giovanna Gisella
Ladera-Castañeda, Marysela I
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Cornejo-Pinto, Alberto
Cachay-Criado, Hernán
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis Adolfo
Cayo-Rojas, César Félix
Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study
title Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study
title_full Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study
title_fullStr Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study
title_short Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An In vitro Comparative Study
title_sort surface roughness in nanoparticle resin composites subjected to two polishing systems: an in vitro comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223443
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_279_21
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezvargasgiovannagisella surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT laderacastanedamaryselai surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT lopezgurreonerocarlos surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT cornejopintoalberto surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT cachaycriadohernan surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT cervantesganozaluisadolfo surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT cayorojascesarfelix surfaceroughnessinnanoparticleresincompositessubjectedtotwopolishingsystemsaninvitrocomparativestudy