Cargando…

What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

Innovation ambidexterity has emerged as a primary interest in management research due to the strategy’s support for adaptability and flexibility pursuant to competitiveness. While management studies investigate and explicate the socioeconomic and technological challenges of ambidexterity, there is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saleh, Rabab H., Durugbo, Christopher M., Almahamid, Soud M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202361/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00659-4
_version_ 1785045427102416896
author Saleh, Rabab H.
Durugbo, Christopher M.
Almahamid, Soud M.
author_facet Saleh, Rabab H.
Durugbo, Christopher M.
Almahamid, Soud M.
author_sort Saleh, Rabab H.
collection PubMed
description Innovation ambidexterity has emerged as a primary interest in management research due to the strategy’s support for adaptability and flexibility pursuant to competitiveness. While management studies investigate and explicate the socioeconomic and technological challenges of ambidexterity, there is a gap in knowledge on the determinants that underpin the management of ambidextrous organisations. To tackle this paucity, this article uses a systematic approach to review existing literature on innovation ambidexterity, identifying the main determinants for managing ambidexterity in organisations, and setting an agenda for future management research informed by these determinants. The review assembles and critically appraises 121 articles published between 2007 and 2021. It examines the research clusters, investigated industry sectors, research methodologies, management theories, and research contributions of studies on innovation ambidexterity. The review finds seven main determinants for managing ambidexterity consisting of: (i) process mechanisms, (ii) organisational learning, (iii) leadership styles, (iv) technology investments, (v) organisational contexts, (vi) environmental uncertainties, and (vii) institutional pressures. Using insights from the review process, the article proposes a set of management priorities and suggests seven areas for future ambidexterity research with respect to digital interdependence, organisational legacy, stewardship behaviour, technology sourcing, organisational resilience, environmental readiness, and institutional transformation. Theoretically, the article contributes to knowledge via a multi-level ‘wheel’ model of ambidexterity management that links management determinants to priorities, and managerially, the review offers a fresh perspective on management factors for ambidexterity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10202361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102023612023-05-23 What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges Saleh, Rabab H. Durugbo, Christopher M. Almahamid, Soud M. Rev Manag Sci Review Paper Innovation ambidexterity has emerged as a primary interest in management research due to the strategy’s support for adaptability and flexibility pursuant to competitiveness. While management studies investigate and explicate the socioeconomic and technological challenges of ambidexterity, there is a gap in knowledge on the determinants that underpin the management of ambidextrous organisations. To tackle this paucity, this article uses a systematic approach to review existing literature on innovation ambidexterity, identifying the main determinants for managing ambidexterity in organisations, and setting an agenda for future management research informed by these determinants. The review assembles and critically appraises 121 articles published between 2007 and 2021. It examines the research clusters, investigated industry sectors, research methodologies, management theories, and research contributions of studies on innovation ambidexterity. The review finds seven main determinants for managing ambidexterity consisting of: (i) process mechanisms, (ii) organisational learning, (iii) leadership styles, (iv) technology investments, (v) organisational contexts, (vi) environmental uncertainties, and (vii) institutional pressures. Using insights from the review process, the article proposes a set of management priorities and suggests seven areas for future ambidexterity research with respect to digital interdependence, organisational legacy, stewardship behaviour, technology sourcing, organisational resilience, environmental readiness, and institutional transformation. Theoretically, the article contributes to knowledge via a multi-level ‘wheel’ model of ambidexterity management that links management determinants to priorities, and managerially, the review offers a fresh perspective on management factors for ambidexterity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10202361/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00659-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Saleh, Rabab H.
Durugbo, Christopher M.
Almahamid, Soud M.
What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
title What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
title_full What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
title_fullStr What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
title_full_unstemmed What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
title_short What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
title_sort what makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202361/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00659-4
work_keys_str_mv AT salehrababh whatmakesinnovationambidexteritymanageableasystematicreviewmultilevelmodelandfuturechallenges
AT durugbochristopherm whatmakesinnovationambidexteritymanageableasystematicreviewmultilevelmodelandfuturechallenges
AT almahamidsoudm whatmakesinnovationambidexteritymanageableasystematicreviewmultilevelmodelandfuturechallenges