Cargando…

Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures

A 2-yr study (year 1: March to September 2017; year 2: February to August 2018) was conducted using crossbred steers (year 1: n = 1677; initial body weight [BW] = 372 kg, SD = 47; year 2: n = 1713; initial BW = 379 kg, SD = 10) in a commercial feedyard study in Eastern NE to determine the effects of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winders, Thomas M, Melton, Brett A, Boyd, Bradley M, Macken, Casey N, Watson, Andrea K, MacDonald, James C, Erickson, Galen E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37217179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad004
_version_ 1785045449765289984
author Winders, Thomas M
Melton, Brett A
Boyd, Bradley M
Macken, Casey N
Watson, Andrea K
MacDonald, James C
Erickson, Galen E
author_facet Winders, Thomas M
Melton, Brett A
Boyd, Bradley M
Macken, Casey N
Watson, Andrea K
MacDonald, James C
Erickson, Galen E
author_sort Winders, Thomas M
collection PubMed
description A 2-yr study (year 1: March to September 2017; year 2: February to August 2018) was conducted using crossbred steers (year 1: n = 1677; initial body weight [BW] = 372 kg, SD = 47; year 2: n = 1713; initial BW = 379 kg, SD = 10) in a commercial feedyard study in Eastern NE to determine the effects of shade on cattle performance, ear temperature, and cattle activity. Two treatments were evaluated using a randomized complete block design (n = 5 blocks based on arrival). Treatments were assigned randomly to pens and consisted of five pens without shade (NO SHADE) and five pens with shade (SHADE). Ear temperatures were collected throughout the trials using biometric sensing ear tags on a subset of cattle. Panting scores were collected using a 5 point scale determined visually based on the level of panting occurring on the same subset of steers a minimum of twice weekly from June 8 to August 21 in year 1 and May 29 to July 24 in year 2 by one trained individual each year. In year 1, no differences (P ≥ 0.24) were observed for growth performance or carcass characteristics. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) were greater (P ≤ 0.04) for SHADE cattle in year 2. Over the entire feeding period in year 1, greater (P < 0.01) ear temperature was observed for NO SHADE cattle, but cattle movement was not different (P = 0.38) between treatments. When evaluating the entire feeding period in year 2, cattle movement and ear temperature were not different (P ≥ 0.80) between treatments. Cattle in the SHADE treatment had lower (P ≤ 0.04) panting scores in years 1 and 2. These data suggest that providing shade can lessen the negative influence of heat events on DMI and was an effective way to reduce heat stress in feedlot operations, but only impacted ADG if heat events were close to the cattle slaughter date.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10202550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102025502023-05-23 Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures Winders, Thomas M Melton, Brett A Boyd, Bradley M Macken, Casey N Watson, Andrea K MacDonald, James C Erickson, Galen E J Anim Sci Featured Collection A 2-yr study (year 1: March to September 2017; year 2: February to August 2018) was conducted using crossbred steers (year 1: n = 1677; initial body weight [BW] = 372 kg, SD = 47; year 2: n = 1713; initial BW = 379 kg, SD = 10) in a commercial feedyard study in Eastern NE to determine the effects of shade on cattle performance, ear temperature, and cattle activity. Two treatments were evaluated using a randomized complete block design (n = 5 blocks based on arrival). Treatments were assigned randomly to pens and consisted of five pens without shade (NO SHADE) and five pens with shade (SHADE). Ear temperatures were collected throughout the trials using biometric sensing ear tags on a subset of cattle. Panting scores were collected using a 5 point scale determined visually based on the level of panting occurring on the same subset of steers a minimum of twice weekly from June 8 to August 21 in year 1 and May 29 to July 24 in year 2 by one trained individual each year. In year 1, no differences (P ≥ 0.24) were observed for growth performance or carcass characteristics. Dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) were greater (P ≤ 0.04) for SHADE cattle in year 2. Over the entire feeding period in year 1, greater (P < 0.01) ear temperature was observed for NO SHADE cattle, but cattle movement was not different (P = 0.38) between treatments. When evaluating the entire feeding period in year 2, cattle movement and ear temperature were not different (P ≥ 0.80) between treatments. Cattle in the SHADE treatment had lower (P ≤ 0.04) panting scores in years 1 and 2. These data suggest that providing shade can lessen the negative influence of heat events on DMI and was an effective way to reduce heat stress in feedlot operations, but only impacted ADG if heat events were close to the cattle slaughter date. Oxford University Press 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10202550/ /pubmed/37217179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad004 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Featured Collection
Winders, Thomas M
Melton, Brett A
Boyd, Bradley M
Macken, Casey N
Watson, Andrea K
MacDonald, James C
Erickson, Galen E
Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
title Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
title_full Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
title_fullStr Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
title_full_unstemmed Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
title_short Impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
title_sort impact of shade in beef feedyards on performance, ear temperature, and heat stress measures
topic Featured Collection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37217179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad004
work_keys_str_mv AT windersthomasm impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures
AT meltonbretta impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures
AT boydbradleym impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures
AT mackencaseyn impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures
AT watsonandreak impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures
AT macdonaldjamesc impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures
AT ericksongalene impactofshadeinbeeffeedyardsonperformanceeartemperatureandheatstressmeasures