Cargando…

Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness

Introduction This study focuses on investigating the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement in patients with moderate renal calculi of size 2.5 cm or less who undergo uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures. Previous studies have not specified whether only uncomplicated ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KR, Surag, Singh, Anshuman, Sharma, Pritam, Pai, Vivek, Choudhary, Anupam, Patil, Shreenath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223339
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39211
_version_ 1785045475525656576
author KR, Surag
Singh, Anshuman
Sharma, Pritam
Pai, Vivek
Choudhary, Anupam
Patil, Shreenath
author_facet KR, Surag
Singh, Anshuman
Sharma, Pritam
Pai, Vivek
Choudhary, Anupam
Patil, Shreenath
author_sort KR, Surag
collection PubMed
description Introduction This study focuses on investigating the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement in patients with moderate renal calculi of size 2.5 cm or less who undergo uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures. Previous studies have not specified whether only uncomplicated cases were included in the analysis, which may affect the results. This study aims to provide a clearer understanding of the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement on blood loss in a more homogeneous patient population. Materials and methods A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at our department over 18 months, dividing 60 patients with a single renal or upper ureteric calculus of size ≤2.5 cm into two groups: 30 patients in each group (group 1: tubed PCNL, group 2: tubeless PCNL). The primary outcome was the drop in perioperative hemoglobin level and the number of packed cell transfusions necessary. The secondary outcome included the mean pain score, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, and the total cost of the procedure. Results The two groups were comparable in age, gender, comorbidities, and stone size. The postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly lower in the tubeless PCNL group (9.56 ± 2.13 gm/dL) compared to the tube PCNL group (11.32 ± 2.35 gm/dL) (p = 0.0037), and two patients in the tubeless group required blood transfusion. The duration of surgery, pain scores, and analgesic requirement were comparable between the two groups. The total procedure cost was significantly lower in the tubeless group (p = 0.0019), and the duration of hospital stay and time to return to daily activities were significantly shorter in the tubeless group (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Tubeless PCNL is a safe and effective alternative to conventional tube PCNL, with the advantages of shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, and lower procedure costs. Tube PCNL is associated with less blood loss and the need for transfusions. Patient preferences and bleeding risk should be considered when choosing between the two procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10202682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102026822023-05-23 Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness KR, Surag Singh, Anshuman Sharma, Pritam Pai, Vivek Choudhary, Anupam Patil, Shreenath Cureus Internal Medicine Introduction This study focuses on investigating the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement in patients with moderate renal calculi of size 2.5 cm or less who undergo uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures. Previous studies have not specified whether only uncomplicated cases were included in the analysis, which may affect the results. This study aims to provide a clearer understanding of the effect of routine nephrostomy tube placement on blood loss in a more homogeneous patient population. Materials and methods A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at our department over 18 months, dividing 60 patients with a single renal or upper ureteric calculus of size ≤2.5 cm into two groups: 30 patients in each group (group 1: tubed PCNL, group 2: tubeless PCNL). The primary outcome was the drop in perioperative hemoglobin level and the number of packed cell transfusions necessary. The secondary outcome included the mean pain score, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, and the total cost of the procedure. Results The two groups were comparable in age, gender, comorbidities, and stone size. The postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly lower in the tubeless PCNL group (9.56 ± 2.13 gm/dL) compared to the tube PCNL group (11.32 ± 2.35 gm/dL) (p = 0.0037), and two patients in the tubeless group required blood transfusion. The duration of surgery, pain scores, and analgesic requirement were comparable between the two groups. The total procedure cost was significantly lower in the tubeless group (p = 0.0019), and the duration of hospital stay and time to return to daily activities were significantly shorter in the tubeless group (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Tubeless PCNL is a safe and effective alternative to conventional tube PCNL, with the advantages of shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, and lower procedure costs. Tube PCNL is associated with less blood loss and the need for transfusions. Patient preferences and bleeding risk should be considered when choosing between the two procedures. Cureus 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10202682/ /pubmed/37223339 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39211 Text en Copyright © 2023, KR et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
KR, Surag
Singh, Anshuman
Sharma, Pritam
Pai, Vivek
Choudhary, Anupam
Patil, Shreenath
Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness
title Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness
title_full Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness
title_fullStr Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness
title_short Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness
title_sort comparing tubeless and tubed approaches in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for moderate renal calculi: outcomes on safety, efficacy, pain management, recovery time, and cost-effectiveness
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223339
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39211
work_keys_str_mv AT krsurag comparingtubelessandtubedapproachesinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyformoderaterenalcalculioutcomesonsafetyefficacypainmanagementrecoverytimeandcosteffectiveness
AT singhanshuman comparingtubelessandtubedapproachesinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyformoderaterenalcalculioutcomesonsafetyefficacypainmanagementrecoverytimeandcosteffectiveness
AT sharmapritam comparingtubelessandtubedapproachesinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyformoderaterenalcalculioutcomesonsafetyefficacypainmanagementrecoverytimeandcosteffectiveness
AT paivivek comparingtubelessandtubedapproachesinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyformoderaterenalcalculioutcomesonsafetyefficacypainmanagementrecoverytimeandcosteffectiveness
AT choudharyanupam comparingtubelessandtubedapproachesinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyformoderaterenalcalculioutcomesonsafetyefficacypainmanagementrecoverytimeandcosteffectiveness
AT patilshreenath comparingtubelessandtubedapproachesinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyformoderaterenalcalculioutcomesonsafetyefficacypainmanagementrecoverytimeandcosteffectiveness