Cargando…
Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study
PURPOSE: Many people do not participate in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs due to difficulties using the screening kit. The current study investigated the ways the screening kit could be modified to improve usability. METHODS: 1,109 people evaluated 15 different screening kit modifications....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01695-x |
_version_ | 1785045533851648000 |
---|---|
author | Myers, L. Ireland, M. J. Viljoen, B. Goodwin, B. |
author_facet | Myers, L. Ireland, M. J. Viljoen, B. Goodwin, B. |
author_sort | Myers, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Many people do not participate in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs due to difficulties using the screening kit. The current study investigated the ways the screening kit could be modified to improve usability. METHODS: 1,109 people evaluated 15 different screening kit modifications. Participants reported on how these kit modifications would affect their screening barriers, their future screening intentions, and how much they would recommend that the modification is made to the current screening kit used the program. All responses were given via an online survey conducted between April and December of 2021. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of previous NBCSP non-participators indicated that a one-sample test would increase their intention to participate. Recommendation ratings demonstrated higher levels of support for modifications that included providing a barcode naming label (M = 9.06, 95% CI [8.81, 9.31]), having a larger diameter opening of the collection tube (M = 8.42, 95% CI [8.10, 8.74]), and highlighting the expiry date on the kit packaging (M = 8.59, 95% CI [8.29, 8.89]). There were lower levels of support for modifications that reduced the size of the packaging the kit is sent in (M = 6.47, 95% CI [6.09, 6.85]), removed branding from kit packaging (M = 5.98, 95% CI [5.57, 6.39]), and removed the information booklet that comes with the screening kit (M = 5.25, 95% CI [4.78, 5.72]). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight multiple ways in which bowel cancer screening kits can be changed to increase usability for invitees of national bowel cancer screening programs. Findings have implications for all screening programs that use immunochemical-based bowel cancer screening kits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01695-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10202976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102029762023-05-24 Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study Myers, L. Ireland, M. J. Viljoen, B. Goodwin, B. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper PURPOSE: Many people do not participate in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs due to difficulties using the screening kit. The current study investigated the ways the screening kit could be modified to improve usability. METHODS: 1,109 people evaluated 15 different screening kit modifications. Participants reported on how these kit modifications would affect their screening barriers, their future screening intentions, and how much they would recommend that the modification is made to the current screening kit used the program. All responses were given via an online survey conducted between April and December of 2021. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of previous NBCSP non-participators indicated that a one-sample test would increase their intention to participate. Recommendation ratings demonstrated higher levels of support for modifications that included providing a barcode naming label (M = 9.06, 95% CI [8.81, 9.31]), having a larger diameter opening of the collection tube (M = 8.42, 95% CI [8.10, 8.74]), and highlighting the expiry date on the kit packaging (M = 8.59, 95% CI [8.29, 8.89]). There were lower levels of support for modifications that reduced the size of the packaging the kit is sent in (M = 6.47, 95% CI [6.09, 6.85]), removed branding from kit packaging (M = 5.98, 95% CI [5.57, 6.39]), and removed the information booklet that comes with the screening kit (M = 5.25, 95% CI [4.78, 5.72]). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight multiple ways in which bowel cancer screening kits can be changed to increase usability for invitees of national bowel cancer screening programs. Findings have implications for all screening programs that use immunochemical-based bowel cancer screening kits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01695-x. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10202976/ /pubmed/37081155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01695-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Myers, L. Ireland, M. J. Viljoen, B. Goodwin, B. Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
title | Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
title_full | Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
title_short | Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
title_sort | evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01695-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myersl evaluatingchangestohomebowelcancerscreeningkitsanenduserperspectivestudy AT irelandmj evaluatingchangestohomebowelcancerscreeningkitsanenduserperspectivestudy AT viljoenb evaluatingchangestohomebowelcancerscreeningkitsanenduserperspectivestudy AT goodwinb evaluatingchangestohomebowelcancerscreeningkitsanenduserperspectivestudy |