Cargando…

Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review

PURPOSE: To synthesize the available evidence comparing noninvasive methods of measuring the cessation of circulation in patients who are potential organ donors undergoing death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) with the current accepted standard of invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klowak, Jennifer A., Nguyen, Anna-Lisa V., Malik, Abdullah, Hornby, Laura, Doig, Christopher J., Kawchuk, Joann, Sekhon, Mypinder, Dhanani, Sonny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02424-3
_version_ 1785045535505252352
author Klowak, Jennifer A.
Nguyen, Anna-Lisa V.
Malik, Abdullah
Hornby, Laura
Doig, Christopher J.
Kawchuk, Joann
Sekhon, Mypinder
Dhanani, Sonny
author_facet Klowak, Jennifer A.
Nguyen, Anna-Lisa V.
Malik, Abdullah
Hornby, Laura
Doig, Christopher J.
Kawchuk, Joann
Sekhon, Mypinder
Dhanani, Sonny
author_sort Klowak, Jennifer A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To synthesize the available evidence comparing noninvasive methods of measuring the cessation of circulation in patients who are potential organ donors undergoing death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) with the current accepted standard of invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) monitoring. SOURCE: We searched (from inception until 27 April 2021) MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We screened citations and manuscripts independently and in duplicate for eligible studies that compared noninvasive methodologies assessing circulation in patients who were monitored around a period of cessation of circulation. We performed risk of bias assessment, data abstraction, and quality assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation in duplicate and independently. We presented findings narratively. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We included 21 eligible studies (N = 1,177 patients). Meta-analysis was not possible because of study heterogeneity. We identified low quality evidence from four indirect studies (n = 89) showing pulse palpation is less sensitive and specific than IAP (reported sensitivity range, 0.76–0.90; specificity, 0.41–0.79). Isoelectric electrocardiogram (ECG) had excellent specificity for death (two studies; 0% [0/510]), but likely increases the average time to death determination (moderate quality evidence). We are uncertain whether point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) pulse check, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), or POCUS cardiac motion assessment are accurate tests for the determination of circulatory cessation (very low-quality evidence). CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence that ECG, POCUS pulse check, cerebral NIRS, or POCUS cardiac motion assessment are superior or equivalent to IAP for DCC in the setting of organ donation. Isoelectric ECG is specific but can increase the time needed to determine death. Point-of-care ultrasound techniques are emerging therapies with promising initial data but are limited by indirectness and imprecision. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021258936); first submitted 16 June 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-023-02424-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10202983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102029832023-05-24 Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review Klowak, Jennifer A. Nguyen, Anna-Lisa V. Malik, Abdullah Hornby, Laura Doig, Christopher J. Kawchuk, Joann Sekhon, Mypinder Dhanani, Sonny Can J Anaesth Review Article/Brief Review PURPOSE: To synthesize the available evidence comparing noninvasive methods of measuring the cessation of circulation in patients who are potential organ donors undergoing death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) with the current accepted standard of invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) monitoring. SOURCE: We searched (from inception until 27 April 2021) MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We screened citations and manuscripts independently and in duplicate for eligible studies that compared noninvasive methodologies assessing circulation in patients who were monitored around a period of cessation of circulation. We performed risk of bias assessment, data abstraction, and quality assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation in duplicate and independently. We presented findings narratively. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We included 21 eligible studies (N = 1,177 patients). Meta-analysis was not possible because of study heterogeneity. We identified low quality evidence from four indirect studies (n = 89) showing pulse palpation is less sensitive and specific than IAP (reported sensitivity range, 0.76–0.90; specificity, 0.41–0.79). Isoelectric electrocardiogram (ECG) had excellent specificity for death (two studies; 0% [0/510]), but likely increases the average time to death determination (moderate quality evidence). We are uncertain whether point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) pulse check, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), or POCUS cardiac motion assessment are accurate tests for the determination of circulatory cessation (very low-quality evidence). CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence that ECG, POCUS pulse check, cerebral NIRS, or POCUS cardiac motion assessment are superior or equivalent to IAP for DCC in the setting of organ donation. Isoelectric ECG is specific but can increase the time needed to determine death. Point-of-care ultrasound techniques are emerging therapies with promising initial data but are limited by indirectness and imprecision. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021258936); first submitted 16 June 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-023-02424-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10202983/ /pubmed/37138156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02424-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article/Brief Review
Klowak, Jennifer A.
Nguyen, Anna-Lisa V.
Malik, Abdullah
Hornby, Laura
Doig, Christopher J.
Kawchuk, Joann
Sekhon, Mypinder
Dhanani, Sonny
Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
title Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
title_full Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
title_short Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
title_sort diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review
topic Review Article/Brief Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02424-3
work_keys_str_mv AT klowakjennifera diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT nguyenannalisav diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT malikabdullah diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT hornbylaura diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT doigchristopherj diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT kawchukjoann diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT sekhonmypinder diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview
AT dhananisonny diagnostictestaccuracyforcessationofcirculationduringdeathdeterminationasystematicreview