Cargando…
Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit
PURPOSE: Variability in practice exists in death determination by circulatory criteria in the context of organ donation. We sought to describe the practices of intensive care health care professionals for death determination by circulatory criteria with and without organ donation. METHODS: This stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02412-7 |
_version_ | 1785045537928511488 |
---|---|
author | Shemie, Jonah Scales, Nathan B. Sucha, Ewa Barrowman, Nick Hornby, Laura van Beinum, Amanda Dhanani, Sonny |
author_facet | Shemie, Jonah Scales, Nathan B. Sucha, Ewa Barrowman, Nick Hornby, Laura van Beinum, Amanda Dhanani, Sonny |
author_sort | Shemie, Jonah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Variability in practice exists in death determination by circulatory criteria in the context of organ donation. We sought to describe the practices of intensive care health care professionals for death determination by circulatory criteria with and without organ donation. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included patients with death determination by circulatory criteria in intensive care units at 16 hospitals in Canada, three in the Czech Republic, and one in the Netherlands. Results were recorded using a checklist for the determination of death questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 583 patients had their death determination checklist reviewed for statistical analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age in years was 64 (15). Three hundred and fourteen (54.0%) patients were from Canada, 230 (39.5%) were from the Czech Republic, and 38 (6.5%) were from the Netherlands. Fifty-two (8.9%) patients proceeded with donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCD). The most common diagnostic tests reported for the whole group were absent heart sounds by auscultation (81.8%), flat continuous arterial blood pressure (ABP) tracing (77.0%), and flat electrocardiogram tracing (73.2%). In patients who successfully underwent DCD (N = 52), death was determined most frequently using a flat continuous ABP tracing (94%), absent pulse oximetry (85%), and absent palpable pulse (77%). CONCLUSION: In this study, we have described practices for death determination by circulatory criteria both within and between countries. Though some variability exists, we are reassured that appropriate criteria are almost always used in the context of organ donation. In particular, the use of continuous ABP monitoring in DCD was consistent. It highlights the need for standardization of practice and up to date guidelines, especially within the context of DCD where there is both an ethical and a legal requirement to adhere to the dead donor rule, while minimizing time between death determination and organ procurement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-023-02412-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10202993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102029932023-05-24 Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit Shemie, Jonah Scales, Nathan B. Sucha, Ewa Barrowman, Nick Hornby, Laura van Beinum, Amanda Dhanani, Sonny Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Variability in practice exists in death determination by circulatory criteria in the context of organ donation. We sought to describe the practices of intensive care health care professionals for death determination by circulatory criteria with and without organ donation. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included patients with death determination by circulatory criteria in intensive care units at 16 hospitals in Canada, three in the Czech Republic, and one in the Netherlands. Results were recorded using a checklist for the determination of death questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 583 patients had their death determination checklist reviewed for statistical analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age in years was 64 (15). Three hundred and fourteen (54.0%) patients were from Canada, 230 (39.5%) were from the Czech Republic, and 38 (6.5%) were from the Netherlands. Fifty-two (8.9%) patients proceeded with donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCD). The most common diagnostic tests reported for the whole group were absent heart sounds by auscultation (81.8%), flat continuous arterial blood pressure (ABP) tracing (77.0%), and flat electrocardiogram tracing (73.2%). In patients who successfully underwent DCD (N = 52), death was determined most frequently using a flat continuous ABP tracing (94%), absent pulse oximetry (85%), and absent palpable pulse (77%). CONCLUSION: In this study, we have described practices for death determination by circulatory criteria both within and between countries. Though some variability exists, we are reassured that appropriate criteria are almost always used in the context of organ donation. In particular, the use of continuous ABP monitoring in DCD was consistent. It highlights the need for standardization of practice and up to date guidelines, especially within the context of DCD where there is both an ethical and a legal requirement to adhere to the dead donor rule, while minimizing time between death determination and organ procurement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-023-02412-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10202993/ /pubmed/37131026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02412-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reports of Original Investigations Shemie, Jonah Scales, Nathan B. Sucha, Ewa Barrowman, Nick Hornby, Laura van Beinum, Amanda Dhanani, Sonny Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
title | Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
title_full | Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
title_fullStr | Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
title_short | Variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
title_sort | variability in criteria for death determination in the intensive care unit |
topic | Reports of Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02412-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shemiejonah variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit AT scalesnathanb variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit AT suchaewa variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit AT barrowmannick variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit AT hornbylaura variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit AT vanbeinumamanda variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit AT dhananisonny variabilityincriteriafordeathdeterminationintheintensivecareunit |