Cargando…

The reticular activating system: a narrative review of discovery, evolving understanding, and relevance to current formulations of brain death

A series of landmark experiments conducted throughout the 20(th) century progressively localized the regions involved in consciousness to the reticular activating system (RAS) and its ascending projections. The first description of the RAS emerged in 1949 through seminal experiments performed by Mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taran, Shaurya, Gros, Priti, Gofton, Teneille, Boyd, Gordon, Briard, Joel Neves, Chassé, Michaël, Singh, Jeffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37155119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02421-6
Descripción
Sumario:A series of landmark experiments conducted throughout the 20(th) century progressively localized the regions involved in consciousness to the reticular activating system (RAS) and its ascending projections. The first description of the RAS emerged in 1949 through seminal experiments performed by Moruzzi and Magoun in feline brainstems; additional experiments in the 1950s revealed connections between the RAS and the thalamus and neocortical structures. This knowledge has allowed for the explanation of disorders of consciousness with exquisite anatomic precision. The clinical relevance of the RAS is further apparent in modern definitions of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC), which require demonstration of the complete and permanent loss of capacity for consciousness as one of their core criteria. BD/DNC is currently understood across jurisdictions in terms of “whole brain” and “brainstem” formulations. Although their clinical examination between formulations is indistinguishable, policies for BD/DNC declaration may differ in the rare scenario of patients with isolated infratentorial brain injuries, in which ancillary testing is advised in the whole brain formulation but not the brainstem formulation. Canadian guidelines acknowledge that the distinction between whole brain and brainstem formulations is unclear with respect to clinical implications for patients with isolated infratentorial injuries. This has led to variability in Canadian clinicians’ use of ancillary testing when the mechanism of BD/DNC is suspected to be an isolated infratentorial injury. The present narrative review highlights these concepts and explores implications for determination of BD/DNC in Canada, with specific emphasis on the RAS and its relevance to both formulations.