Cargando…

Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms

INTRODUCTION: To improve the utilization of continuous- and flash glucose monitoring (CGM/FGM) data we have tested the hypothesis that a machine learning (ML) model can be trained to identify the most likely root causes for hypoglycemic events. METHODS: CGM/FGM data were collected from 449 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cederblad, Lars, Eklund, Gustav, Vedal, Amund, Hill, Henrik, Caballero-Corbalan, José, Hellman, Jarl, Abrahamsson, Niclas, Wahlström-Johnsson, Inger, Carlsson, Per-Ola, Espes, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37052842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01403-7
_version_ 1785045555073777664
author Cederblad, Lars
Eklund, Gustav
Vedal, Amund
Hill, Henrik
Caballero-Corbalan, José
Hellman, Jarl
Abrahamsson, Niclas
Wahlström-Johnsson, Inger
Carlsson, Per-Ola
Espes, Daniel
author_facet Cederblad, Lars
Eklund, Gustav
Vedal, Amund
Hill, Henrik
Caballero-Corbalan, José
Hellman, Jarl
Abrahamsson, Niclas
Wahlström-Johnsson, Inger
Carlsson, Per-Ola
Espes, Daniel
author_sort Cederblad, Lars
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To improve the utilization of continuous- and flash glucose monitoring (CGM/FGM) data we have tested the hypothesis that a machine learning (ML) model can be trained to identify the most likely root causes for hypoglycemic events. METHODS: CGM/FGM data were collected from 449 patients with type 1 diabetes. Of the 42,120 identified hypoglycemic events, 5041 were randomly selected for classification by two clinicians. Three causes of hypoglycemia were deemed possible to interpret and later validate by insulin and carbohydrate recordings: (1) overestimated bolus (27%), (2) overcorrection of hyperglycemia (29%) and (3) excessive basal insulin presure (44%). The dataset was split into a training (n = 4026 events, 304 patients) and an internal validation dataset (n = 1015 events, 145 patients). A number of ML model architectures were applied and evaluated. A separate dataset was generated from 22 patients (13 ‘known’ and 9 ‘unknown’) with insulin and carbohydrate recordings. Hypoglycemic events from this dataset were also interpreted by five clinicians independently. RESULTS: Of the evaluated ML models, a purpose-built convolutional neural network (HypoCNN) performed best. Masking the time series, adding time features and using class weights improved the performance of this model, resulting in an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 in the original train/test split. In the dataset validated by insulin and carbohydrate recordings (n = 435 events), i.e. ‘ground truth,’ our HypoCNN model achieved an AUC of 0.917. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the notion that ML models can be trained to interpret CGM/FGM data. Our HypoCNN model provides a robust and accurate method to identify root causes of hypoglycemic events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-023-01403-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10203083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102030832023-05-24 Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms Cederblad, Lars Eklund, Gustav Vedal, Amund Hill, Henrik Caballero-Corbalan, José Hellman, Jarl Abrahamsson, Niclas Wahlström-Johnsson, Inger Carlsson, Per-Ola Espes, Daniel Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To improve the utilization of continuous- and flash glucose monitoring (CGM/FGM) data we have tested the hypothesis that a machine learning (ML) model can be trained to identify the most likely root causes for hypoglycemic events. METHODS: CGM/FGM data were collected from 449 patients with type 1 diabetes. Of the 42,120 identified hypoglycemic events, 5041 were randomly selected for classification by two clinicians. Three causes of hypoglycemia were deemed possible to interpret and later validate by insulin and carbohydrate recordings: (1) overestimated bolus (27%), (2) overcorrection of hyperglycemia (29%) and (3) excessive basal insulin presure (44%). The dataset was split into a training (n = 4026 events, 304 patients) and an internal validation dataset (n = 1015 events, 145 patients). A number of ML model architectures were applied and evaluated. A separate dataset was generated from 22 patients (13 ‘known’ and 9 ‘unknown’) with insulin and carbohydrate recordings. Hypoglycemic events from this dataset were also interpreted by five clinicians independently. RESULTS: Of the evaluated ML models, a purpose-built convolutional neural network (HypoCNN) performed best. Masking the time series, adding time features and using class weights improved the performance of this model, resulting in an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 in the original train/test split. In the dataset validated by insulin and carbohydrate recordings (n = 435 events), i.e. ‘ground truth,’ our HypoCNN model achieved an AUC of 0.917. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the notion that ML models can be trained to interpret CGM/FGM data. Our HypoCNN model provides a robust and accurate method to identify root causes of hypoglycemic events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-023-01403-7. Springer Healthcare 2023-04-13 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10203083/ /pubmed/37052842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01403-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Cederblad, Lars
Eklund, Gustav
Vedal, Amund
Hill, Henrik
Caballero-Corbalan, José
Hellman, Jarl
Abrahamsson, Niclas
Wahlström-Johnsson, Inger
Carlsson, Per-Ola
Espes, Daniel
Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
title Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
title_full Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
title_fullStr Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
title_short Classification of Hypoglycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
title_sort classification of hypoglycemic events in type 1 diabetes using machine learning algorithms
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37052842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01403-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cederbladlars classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT eklundgustav classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT vedalamund classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT hillhenrik classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT caballerocorbalanjose classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT hellmanjarl classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT abrahamssonniclas classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT wahlstromjohnssoninger classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT carlssonperola classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms
AT espesdaniel classificationofhypoglycemiceventsintype1diabetesusingmachinelearningalgorithms