Cargando…

Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors

SUBJECTIVE: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in polio survivors. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most frequent type. Full polysomnography (PSG) is recommended for OSA diagnosis in patients with comorbidities by current practice guidelines, but it is not always accessible. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Qidi, Liu, Jianghua, Wu, Jinxian, Du, Juan, Li, Xiao, Wang, Meng, Sun, Yunliang, Yu, Yan, Wang, Jingyu, Sun, Ting, Zhang, Chi, Lv, Changjun, Strohl, Kingman P., Han, Fang, Dong, Xiaosong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228407
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1137535
_version_ 1785045580952633344
author Ding, Qidi
Liu, Jianghua
Wu, Jinxian
Du, Juan
Li, Xiao
Wang, Meng
Sun, Yunliang
Yu, Yan
Wang, Jingyu
Sun, Ting
Zhang, Chi
Lv, Changjun
Strohl, Kingman P.
Han, Fang
Dong, Xiaosong
author_facet Ding, Qidi
Liu, Jianghua
Wu, Jinxian
Du, Juan
Li, Xiao
Wang, Meng
Sun, Yunliang
Yu, Yan
Wang, Jingyu
Sun, Ting
Zhang, Chi
Lv, Changjun
Strohl, Kingman P.
Han, Fang
Dong, Xiaosong
author_sort Ding, Qidi
collection PubMed
description SUBJECTIVE: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in polio survivors. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most frequent type. Full polysomnography (PSG) is recommended for OSA diagnosis in patients with comorbidities by current practice guidelines, but it is not always accessible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether type 3 portable monitor (PM) or type 4 PM might be a viable alternative to PSG for the diagnosis of OSA in postpolio subjects. METHODS: A total of 48 community-living polio survivors (39 men and 9 women) with an average age of 54.4 ± 5.3 years referred for the evaluation of OSA and who volunteered to participate were recruited. First, they completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire and underwent pulmonary function testing and blood gas tests the day before PSG night. Then, they underwent an overnight in-laboratory PSG with a type 3 PM and type 4 PM recording simultaneously. RESULTS: The AHI from PSG, respiratory event index (REI) from type 3 PM, and ODI(3) from type 4 PM was 30.27 ± 22.51/h vs. 25.18 ± 19.11/h vs. 18.28 ± 15.13/h, respectively (P < 0.001). For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 95.45 and 50%, respectively. For AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 87.88% and 93.33%, respectively. The Bland–Altman analysis of REI on PM vs. AHI on PSG showed a mean difference of −5.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −7.10, −3.08; P < 0.001) with limits of agreement ranging from −18.67 to 8.49 events/h. ROC curve analysis for patients with REI ≥ 15/h showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of ODI(3) from type 4 PM were 86.36 and 75%, respectively. For patients with AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity was 66.67%, and the specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Type 3 PM and Type 4 PM could be alternative ways to screen OSA for polio survivors, especially for moderate to severe OSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10203206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102032062023-05-24 Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors Ding, Qidi Liu, Jianghua Wu, Jinxian Du, Juan Li, Xiao Wang, Meng Sun, Yunliang Yu, Yan Wang, Jingyu Sun, Ting Zhang, Chi Lv, Changjun Strohl, Kingman P. Han, Fang Dong, Xiaosong Front Neurol Neurology SUBJECTIVE: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in polio survivors. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most frequent type. Full polysomnography (PSG) is recommended for OSA diagnosis in patients with comorbidities by current practice guidelines, but it is not always accessible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether type 3 portable monitor (PM) or type 4 PM might be a viable alternative to PSG for the diagnosis of OSA in postpolio subjects. METHODS: A total of 48 community-living polio survivors (39 men and 9 women) with an average age of 54.4 ± 5.3 years referred for the evaluation of OSA and who volunteered to participate were recruited. First, they completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire and underwent pulmonary function testing and blood gas tests the day before PSG night. Then, they underwent an overnight in-laboratory PSG with a type 3 PM and type 4 PM recording simultaneously. RESULTS: The AHI from PSG, respiratory event index (REI) from type 3 PM, and ODI(3) from type 4 PM was 30.27 ± 22.51/h vs. 25.18 ± 19.11/h vs. 18.28 ± 15.13/h, respectively (P < 0.001). For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 95.45 and 50%, respectively. For AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 87.88% and 93.33%, respectively. The Bland–Altman analysis of REI on PM vs. AHI on PSG showed a mean difference of −5.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −7.10, −3.08; P < 0.001) with limits of agreement ranging from −18.67 to 8.49 events/h. ROC curve analysis for patients with REI ≥ 15/h showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of ODI(3) from type 4 PM were 86.36 and 75%, respectively. For patients with AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity was 66.67%, and the specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Type 3 PM and Type 4 PM could be alternative ways to screen OSA for polio survivors, especially for moderate to severe OSA. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10203206/ /pubmed/37228407 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1137535 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ding, Liu, Wu, Du, Li, Wang, Sun, Yu, Wang, Sun, Zhang, Lv, Strohl, Han and Dong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Ding, Qidi
Liu, Jianghua
Wu, Jinxian
Du, Juan
Li, Xiao
Wang, Meng
Sun, Yunliang
Yu, Yan
Wang, Jingyu
Sun, Ting
Zhang, Chi
Lv, Changjun
Strohl, Kingman P.
Han, Fang
Dong, Xiaosong
Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
title Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
title_full Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
title_fullStr Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
title_short Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
title_sort validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228407
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1137535
work_keys_str_mv AT dingqidi validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT liujianghua validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT wujinxian validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT dujuan validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT lixiao validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT wangmeng validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT sunyunliang validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT yuyan validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT wangjingyu validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT sunting validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT zhangchi validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT lvchangjun validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT strohlkingmanp validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT hanfang validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors
AT dongxiaosong validationofaportablemonitorcomparedwithpolysomnographyforscreeningofobstructivesleepapneainpoliosurvivors