Cargando…

Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (mCPC) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on endothelial cell density (ECD) and reduction of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary-open angle glaucoma (POAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this obse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuebler, Aylin Garip, Priglinger, Siegfried, Reznicek, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1393
_version_ 1785045606590316544
author Kuebler, Aylin Garip
Priglinger, Siegfried
Reznicek, Lukas
author_facet Kuebler, Aylin Garip
Priglinger, Siegfried
Reznicek, Lukas
author_sort Kuebler, Aylin Garip
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (mCPC) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on endothelial cell density (ECD) and reduction of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary-open angle glaucoma (POAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational, retrospective study, 40 eyes with POAG were included. Patients were divided into three groups—group I was treated with SLT (n = 13), group II was treated with mCPC (n = 13), and group III included age-matched patients with medically treated glaucoma (n = 14) (control group). In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) preoperative and postoperative findings of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ECD, and IOP were compared to the control group. RESULTS: The mean time interval before and after the treatment was 215 ± 120 days in group I (SLT) and 273 ± 177 days in group II (mCPC). The follow-up for group III (control group) was 209 ± 103 days. In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) there was a statistically significant reduction of the IOP postoperatively (group I: 3.5 ± 3.7 mm Hg (p = 0.005) and group II: 4.3 ± 4.1 mm Hg (p = 0.003)). The mean IOP for group III was 12.9 ± 3.7 mm Hg at visit 1 and did not change significantly (p = 0.353) at visit 2. In all three groups, there was no statistically significant change in ECD at the last visit. CONCLUSION: According to our results, both SLT and mCPC seem to be effective in lowering the IOP, without showing any statistically significant effect on ECD in patients with POAG. However, larger and longer-term studies are necessary to understand the effects of the SLT and mCPC procedures on ECD. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Garip Kuebler A, Priglinger S, Reznicek L. Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(1):40-43.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10203327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102033272023-05-24 Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure Kuebler, Aylin Garip Priglinger, Siegfried Reznicek, Lukas J Curr Glaucoma Pract Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (mCPC) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on endothelial cell density (ECD) and reduction of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary-open angle glaucoma (POAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational, retrospective study, 40 eyes with POAG were included. Patients were divided into three groups—group I was treated with SLT (n = 13), group II was treated with mCPC (n = 13), and group III included age-matched patients with medically treated glaucoma (n = 14) (control group). In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) preoperative and postoperative findings of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ECD, and IOP were compared to the control group. RESULTS: The mean time interval before and after the treatment was 215 ± 120 days in group I (SLT) and 273 ± 177 days in group II (mCPC). The follow-up for group III (control group) was 209 ± 103 days. In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) there was a statistically significant reduction of the IOP postoperatively (group I: 3.5 ± 3.7 mm Hg (p = 0.005) and group II: 4.3 ± 4.1 mm Hg (p = 0.003)). The mean IOP for group III was 12.9 ± 3.7 mm Hg at visit 1 and did not change significantly (p = 0.353) at visit 2. In all three groups, there was no statistically significant change in ECD at the last visit. CONCLUSION: According to our results, both SLT and mCPC seem to be effective in lowering the IOP, without showing any statistically significant effect on ECD in patients with POAG. However, larger and longer-term studies are necessary to understand the effects of the SLT and mCPC procedures on ECD. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Garip Kuebler A, Priglinger S, Reznicek L. Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(1):40-43. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10203327/ /pubmed/37228306 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1393 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuebler, Aylin Garip
Priglinger, Siegfried
Reznicek, Lukas
Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure
title Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure
title_full Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure
title_fullStr Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure
title_full_unstemmed Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure
title_short Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure
title_sort micropulse cyclophotocoagulation vs selective laser trabeculoplasty: effects on corneal endothelial cells and intraocular pressure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1393
work_keys_str_mv AT kuebleraylingarip micropulsecyclophotocoagulationvsselectivelasertrabeculoplastyeffectsoncornealendothelialcellsandintraocularpressure
AT priglingersiegfried micropulsecyclophotocoagulationvsselectivelasertrabeculoplastyeffectsoncornealendothelialcellsandintraocularpressure
AT rezniceklukas micropulsecyclophotocoagulationvsselectivelasertrabeculoplastyeffectsoncornealendothelialcellsandintraocularpressure