Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study

Both covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs) have been tried in the palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, the comparison of efficacy and safety between th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Liang, Wang, Zhenwen, Huang, Zhiquan, Yang, Xueping, Yu, Zhengping, Cao, Ronglai, Chen, Youxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11996
_version_ 1785045697722056704
author Zhu, Liang
Wang, Zhenwen
Huang, Zhiquan
Yang, Xueping
Yu, Zhengping
Cao, Ronglai
Chen, Youxiang
author_facet Zhu, Liang
Wang, Zhenwen
Huang, Zhiquan
Yang, Xueping
Yu, Zhengping
Cao, Ronglai
Chen, Youxiang
author_sort Zhu, Liang
collection PubMed
description Both covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs) have been tried in the palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, the comparison of efficacy and safety between them remains contested. To the best of our knowledge, no similar studies have assessed this in the Chinese population. In the present study, the clinical and endoscopic data of 238 patients (CSEMSs, n=55; USEMSs, n=183) with malignant distal biliary strictures from 2014 to 2019 were collected. The efficacy indicated by mean stent patency, stent patency rate, mean patient survival time and survival rate, and the safety indicated by adverse events after CSEMS or USEMS placement were retrospectively analyzed and compared. The mean stent patency time was significantly longer in the CSEMSs group than that in the USEMSs group (262.8±195.3 days vs. 169.5±155.7 days, P=0.002). The mean patient survival time was significantly longer in the CSEMSs group than that in the USEMSs group (273.9±197.6 days vs. 184.9±167.6 days, P=0.003). The stent patency rate and patient survival rate were significantly higher in the CSEMSs group than those in the USEMSs group at 6 and 12 months, but not at 1 and 3 months. There was no significant difference in stent dysfunction and adverse events between the two groups, although post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred more frequently in the CSEMSs group than in the USEMSs group (18.1% vs. 8.8%, P=0.049). In conclusion, CSEMSs were better than USEMSs for malignant distal biliary strictures in terms of stent patency time and patient survival time as well as stent patency rate and patient survival rate in the long term (>6 months). Adverse events in the two groups occurred at a similar rate, although the incidence of PEP was higher in the CSEMSs group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10203749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102037492023-05-24 Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study Zhu, Liang Wang, Zhenwen Huang, Zhiquan Yang, Xueping Yu, Zhengping Cao, Ronglai Chen, Youxiang Exp Ther Med Articles Both covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs) have been tried in the palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, the comparison of efficacy and safety between them remains contested. To the best of our knowledge, no similar studies have assessed this in the Chinese population. In the present study, the clinical and endoscopic data of 238 patients (CSEMSs, n=55; USEMSs, n=183) with malignant distal biliary strictures from 2014 to 2019 were collected. The efficacy indicated by mean stent patency, stent patency rate, mean patient survival time and survival rate, and the safety indicated by adverse events after CSEMS or USEMS placement were retrospectively analyzed and compared. The mean stent patency time was significantly longer in the CSEMSs group than that in the USEMSs group (262.8±195.3 days vs. 169.5±155.7 days, P=0.002). The mean patient survival time was significantly longer in the CSEMSs group than that in the USEMSs group (273.9±197.6 days vs. 184.9±167.6 days, P=0.003). The stent patency rate and patient survival rate were significantly higher in the CSEMSs group than those in the USEMSs group at 6 and 12 months, but not at 1 and 3 months. There was no significant difference in stent dysfunction and adverse events between the two groups, although post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred more frequently in the CSEMSs group than in the USEMSs group (18.1% vs. 8.8%, P=0.049). In conclusion, CSEMSs were better than USEMSs for malignant distal biliary strictures in terms of stent patency time and patient survival time as well as stent patency rate and patient survival rate in the long term (>6 months). Adverse events in the two groups occurred at a similar rate, although the incidence of PEP was higher in the CSEMSs group. D.A. Spandidos 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10203749/ /pubmed/37229325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11996 Text en Copyright: © Zhu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zhu, Liang
Wang, Zhenwen
Huang, Zhiquan
Yang, Xueping
Yu, Zhengping
Cao, Ronglai
Chen, Youxiang
Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study
title Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study
title_full Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study
title_short Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study
title_sort efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: a long‑term retrospective study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11996
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuliang efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy
AT wangzhenwen efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy
AT huangzhiquan efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy
AT yangxueping efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy
AT yuzhengping efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy
AT caoronglai efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy
AT chenyouxiang efficacyandsafetyofcoveredversusuncoveredselfexpandablemetalstentsforthepalliativetreatmentofmalignantdistalbiliarystricturealongtermretrospectivestudy