Cargando…

Bariatric surgery provision in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of a national registry

BACKGROUND: When surgery resumed following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines recommended the prioritization of patients with greater obesity-related co-morbidities and/or higher body mass index. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to record the effect of the pandemic on total number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGlone, Emma Rose, Carey, Iain M., Currie, Andrew, Mahawar, Kamal, Welbourn, Richard, Ahmed, Ahmed R., Pring, Chris, Small, Peter K., Khan, Omar A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.05.011
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: When surgery resumed following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines recommended the prioritization of patients with greater obesity-related co-morbidities and/or higher body mass index. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to record the effect of the pandemic on total number, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes of elective bariatric surgery patients in the United Kingdom. SETTING AND METHODS: The United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry was used to identify patients who underwent elective bariatric surgery during the pandemic (1 yr from April 1, 2020). Characteristics of this group were compared with those of a pre-pandemic cohort. Primary outcomes were case volume, case mix, and providers. National Health Service cases were analyzed for baseline health status and perioperative outcomes. Fisher exact, χ(2), and Student t tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: The total number of cases decreased to one third of pre-pandemic volume (8615 to 2930). The decrease in operating volume varied, with 36 hospitals (45%) experiencing a 75%–100% reduction. Cases performed in the National Health Service fell from 74% to 53% (P < .0001). There was no change in baseline body mass index (45.2 ± 8.3 kg/m(2) from 45.5 ± 8.3 kg/m(2); P = .23) or prevalence of type 2 diabetes (26% from 26%; P = .99). Length of stay (median 2 d) and surgical complication rate (1.4% from 2.0%; relative risk = .71; 95% CI .45–1.12; P = .13) were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a dramatic reduction in elective bariatric surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with more severe co-morbidities were not prioritized for surgery. These findings should inform preparation for future crises.