Cargando…

The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters

Nordic walking (NW) is a popular physical activity used to manage chronic diseases and maintain overall health and fitness status. This study aimed to compare NW to ordinary walking (W) with regard to pole length and to identify kinematic differences associated with different poles’ length (55%, 65%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Luca, Belli, Guido, Di Blasio, Andrea, Lupu, Elena, Larion, Alin, Fischetti, Francesco, Montagnani, Eleonora, Di Biase Arrivabene, Pierfrancesco, De Angelis, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020050
_version_ 1785045841069735936
author Russo, Luca
Belli, Guido
Di Blasio, Andrea
Lupu, Elena
Larion, Alin
Fischetti, Francesco
Montagnani, Eleonora
Di Biase Arrivabene, Pierfrancesco
De Angelis, Marco
author_facet Russo, Luca
Belli, Guido
Di Blasio, Andrea
Lupu, Elena
Larion, Alin
Fischetti, Francesco
Montagnani, Eleonora
Di Biase Arrivabene, Pierfrancesco
De Angelis, Marco
author_sort Russo, Luca
collection PubMed
description Nordic walking (NW) is a popular physical activity used to manage chronic diseases and maintain overall health and fitness status. This study aimed to compare NW to ordinary walking (W) with regard to pole length and to identify kinematic differences associated with different poles’ length (55%, 65% and 75% of the subject’s height, respectively). Twelve male volunteers (21.1 ± 0.7 years; 1.74 ± 0.05 m; 68.9 ± 6.1 kg) were tested in four conditions (W, NW55, NW65 and NW75) at three different speeds (4-5-6 km∗h(−1)). Each subject performed a total of twelve tests in a random order. Three-dimensional kinematics of upper and lower body were measured for both W and NW, while oxygen consumption levels (VO(2)) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured only for NW trials with different poles’ length. NW showed a higher step length, lower elbow motion and higher trunk motion (p < 0.05) compared to W. Additionally, NW65 did not show any kinematic or RPE differences compared to NW55 and NW75. Only NW75 showed a higher elbow joint (p < 0.05) and lower pole (p < 0.05) range of motion compared to NW55 and a higher VO(2) (p < 0.05) compared to NW55 and NW65 at 6 km∗h(−1). In conclusion, the use of the poles affects the motion of the upper and lower body during gait. Poles with shorter or longer length do not produce particular changes in NW kinematics. However, increasing the length of the pole can be a smart variation in NW to increase exercise metabolic demand without significantly affecting the kinematics and the RPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10204468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102044682023-05-24 The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters Russo, Luca Belli, Guido Di Blasio, Andrea Lupu, Elena Larion, Alin Fischetti, Francesco Montagnani, Eleonora Di Biase Arrivabene, Pierfrancesco De Angelis, Marco J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Article Nordic walking (NW) is a popular physical activity used to manage chronic diseases and maintain overall health and fitness status. This study aimed to compare NW to ordinary walking (W) with regard to pole length and to identify kinematic differences associated with different poles’ length (55%, 65% and 75% of the subject’s height, respectively). Twelve male volunteers (21.1 ± 0.7 years; 1.74 ± 0.05 m; 68.9 ± 6.1 kg) were tested in four conditions (W, NW55, NW65 and NW75) at three different speeds (4-5-6 km∗h(−1)). Each subject performed a total of twelve tests in a random order. Three-dimensional kinematics of upper and lower body were measured for both W and NW, while oxygen consumption levels (VO(2)) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured only for NW trials with different poles’ length. NW showed a higher step length, lower elbow motion and higher trunk motion (p < 0.05) compared to W. Additionally, NW65 did not show any kinematic or RPE differences compared to NW55 and NW75. Only NW75 showed a higher elbow joint (p < 0.05) and lower pole (p < 0.05) range of motion compared to NW55 and a higher VO(2) (p < 0.05) compared to NW55 and NW65 at 6 km∗h(−1). In conclusion, the use of the poles affects the motion of the upper and lower body during gait. Poles with shorter or longer length do not produce particular changes in NW kinematics. However, increasing the length of the pole can be a smart variation in NW to increase exercise metabolic demand without significantly affecting the kinematics and the RPE. MDPI 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10204468/ /pubmed/37218846 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020050 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Russo, Luca
Belli, Guido
Di Blasio, Andrea
Lupu, Elena
Larion, Alin
Fischetti, Francesco
Montagnani, Eleonora
Di Biase Arrivabene, Pierfrancesco
De Angelis, Marco
The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters
title The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters
title_full The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters
title_fullStr The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters
title_short The Impact of Nordic Walking Pole Length on Gait Kinematic Parameters
title_sort impact of nordic walking pole length on gait kinematic parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8020050
work_keys_str_mv AT russoluca theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT belliguido theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT diblasioandrea theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT lupuelena theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT larionalin theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT fischettifrancesco theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT montagnanieleonora theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT dibiasearrivabenepierfrancesco theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT deangelismarco theimpactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT russoluca impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT belliguido impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT diblasioandrea impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT lupuelena impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT larionalin impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT fischettifrancesco impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT montagnanieleonora impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT dibiasearrivabenepierfrancesco impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters
AT deangelismarco impactofnordicwalkingpolelengthongaitkinematicparameters