Cargando…

Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?

BACKGROUND: Urinary catheters are an important armamentarium of urologic practice. Several indications for their use exist. A good knowledge of the details surrounding every urinary catheter inserted is necessary for the proper management of the patients. Inadequate documentation can lead to complic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okeke, Chike John, Ogunjimi, Moses Adebisi, Jeje, Emmanuel Ajibola, Obi, Anselm Okwudili, Uzoma, Chukwuebuka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228889
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_288_22
_version_ 1785045928729640960
author Okeke, Chike John
Ogunjimi, Moses Adebisi
Jeje, Emmanuel Ajibola
Obi, Anselm Okwudili
Uzoma, Chukwuebuka
author_facet Okeke, Chike John
Ogunjimi, Moses Adebisi
Jeje, Emmanuel Ajibola
Obi, Anselm Okwudili
Uzoma, Chukwuebuka
author_sort Okeke, Chike John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary catheters are an important armamentarium of urologic practice. Several indications for their use exist. A good knowledge of the details surrounding every urinary catheter inserted is necessary for the proper management of the patients. Inadequate documentation can lead to complications such as urinary tract infection or even forgotten catheters. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at auditing the practice of documentation of urinary catheter parameters in our hospital as a means to improving the standard of care and aligning with international best practices with respect to the use of urinary catheters in our hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a 3-month audit on the quality of documentation on the parameters of each urinary catheter use in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. The parameters included the indication for catheterisation, route of catheterisation, staff who catheterised, size of catheter, type of catheter, volume of water used for inflating catheter balloon, volume of urine drained, if aseptic technique was followed during catheterisation, informed consent and complications encountered. Data were summarised as frequencies and means. Statistical significance was pegged at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were men, whereas two were women. The mean age of the patients was 67.29 ± 15.17 years. Overall, sex (76 [100%]), age (76 [100%]) and route of catheterisation (68 [89.5%]) were the three most commonly documented information. The documentation on complications and volume of fluid instilled to inflate the catheter balloon were the least-documented parameters (6 [7.9%] and 11 [14.5%], respectively). The following parameters were better documented in the SPC arm: The staff who passed the catheter p = 0.000), the type of catheter passed (p = 0.004), asepsis (p = 0.001) and acquisition of informed consent (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Documentation following urinary catheter use was noted to be poor in this study. Documentation of catheter parameters was noted to be higher in patients who had SPC than those who had urethral catheterisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10204908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102049082023-05-24 Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough? Okeke, Chike John Ogunjimi, Moses Adebisi Jeje, Emmanuel Ajibola Obi, Anselm Okwudili Uzoma, Chukwuebuka J West Afr Coll Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Urinary catheters are an important armamentarium of urologic practice. Several indications for their use exist. A good knowledge of the details surrounding every urinary catheter inserted is necessary for the proper management of the patients. Inadequate documentation can lead to complications such as urinary tract infection or even forgotten catheters. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at auditing the practice of documentation of urinary catheter parameters in our hospital as a means to improving the standard of care and aligning with international best practices with respect to the use of urinary catheters in our hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a 3-month audit on the quality of documentation on the parameters of each urinary catheter use in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. The parameters included the indication for catheterisation, route of catheterisation, staff who catheterised, size of catheter, type of catheter, volume of water used for inflating catheter balloon, volume of urine drained, if aseptic technique was followed during catheterisation, informed consent and complications encountered. Data were summarised as frequencies and means. Statistical significance was pegged at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were men, whereas two were women. The mean age of the patients was 67.29 ± 15.17 years. Overall, sex (76 [100%]), age (76 [100%]) and route of catheterisation (68 [89.5%]) were the three most commonly documented information. The documentation on complications and volume of fluid instilled to inflate the catheter balloon were the least-documented parameters (6 [7.9%] and 11 [14.5%], respectively). The following parameters were better documented in the SPC arm: The staff who passed the catheter p = 0.000), the type of catheter passed (p = 0.004), asepsis (p = 0.001) and acquisition of informed consent (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Documentation following urinary catheter use was noted to be poor in this study. Documentation of catheter parameters was noted to be higher in patients who had SPC than those who had urethral catheterisation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10204908/ /pubmed/37228889 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_288_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of the West African College of Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Okeke, Chike John
Ogunjimi, Moses Adebisi
Jeje, Emmanuel Ajibola
Obi, Anselm Okwudili
Uzoma, Chukwuebuka
Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?
title Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?
title_full Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?
title_fullStr Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?
title_full_unstemmed Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?
title_short Urinary Catheter Documentation in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: Are We Recording Enough?
title_sort urinary catheter documentation in a nigerian teaching hospital: are we recording enough?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228889
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_288_22
work_keys_str_mv AT okekechikejohn urinarycatheterdocumentationinanigerianteachinghospitalarewerecordingenough
AT ogunjimimosesadebisi urinarycatheterdocumentationinanigerianteachinghospitalarewerecordingenough
AT jejeemmanuelajibola urinarycatheterdocumentationinanigerianteachinghospitalarewerecordingenough
AT obianselmokwudili urinarycatheterdocumentationinanigerianteachinghospitalarewerecordingenough
AT uzomachukwuebuka urinarycatheterdocumentationinanigerianteachinghospitalarewerecordingenough