Cargando…

Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and medium-income countries (LMICs). Abdominal trauma imaging is important in determining the location and severity of organ injury, the need for surgery, and the identification of complications. The choice of imaging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adenuga, Adedire Timilehin, Adeyeye, Ademola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228879
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_273_22
_version_ 1785045930184015872
author Adenuga, Adedire Timilehin
Adeyeye, Ademola
author_facet Adenuga, Adedire Timilehin
Adeyeye, Ademola
author_sort Adenuga, Adedire Timilehin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Abdominal trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and medium-income countries (LMICs). Abdominal trauma imaging is important in determining the location and severity of organ injury, the need for surgery, and the identification of complications. The choice of imaging in abdominal trauma in LMICs is influenced by peculiar problems, which include the availability of imaging modality, expertise, and cost. There are few reports on options of trauma imaging in LMICs, and this study aimed to identify and characterise the type of imaging done for patients presenting with abdominal trauma at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with abdominal trauma who presented at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital from 2013 to 2019. Records were identified, and data were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included in the study. There were 73 males and 14 females. The abdominal ultrasound was the commonest modality done in 36 (41%) patients, whereas abdominal computed tomography was done in five (6%) patients. Eleven patients (13%) had no imaging done, and 10 of these patients proceeded to having surgery. In patients with intraoperative finding of perforated viscus, the sensitivity of radiography was 85% and specificity was 100%, whereas that of the ultrasound was 86.7% and 50% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The ultrasound scan was the commonest imaging done for patients who presented with features of haemorrhage (P = 0.04), odds ratio (OR) = 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08–1.6), and patients with severe injury, P = 0.03, OR = 2.07 (95% CI = 1.06–4.06). Gender (P = 0.64), shock at presentation (P = 0.19), and mechanism of injury (P = 0.11) did not influence the choice of imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal trauma imaging in this setting was majorly via ultrasound and abdominal radiographs. Factors suggested to influence the pattern of abdominal trauma imaging in LMICs include the availability of specific imaging modality, cost, lack of standardisation and definite abdominal trauma protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10204914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102049142023-05-24 Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients Adenuga, Adedire Timilehin Adeyeye, Ademola J West Afr Coll Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Abdominal trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and medium-income countries (LMICs). Abdominal trauma imaging is important in determining the location and severity of organ injury, the need for surgery, and the identification of complications. The choice of imaging in abdominal trauma in LMICs is influenced by peculiar problems, which include the availability of imaging modality, expertise, and cost. There are few reports on options of trauma imaging in LMICs, and this study aimed to identify and characterise the type of imaging done for patients presenting with abdominal trauma at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with abdominal trauma who presented at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital from 2013 to 2019. Records were identified, and data were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included in the study. There were 73 males and 14 females. The abdominal ultrasound was the commonest modality done in 36 (41%) patients, whereas abdominal computed tomography was done in five (6%) patients. Eleven patients (13%) had no imaging done, and 10 of these patients proceeded to having surgery. In patients with intraoperative finding of perforated viscus, the sensitivity of radiography was 85% and specificity was 100%, whereas that of the ultrasound was 86.7% and 50% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The ultrasound scan was the commonest imaging done for patients who presented with features of haemorrhage (P = 0.04), odds ratio (OR) = 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08–1.6), and patients with severe injury, P = 0.03, OR = 2.07 (95% CI = 1.06–4.06). Gender (P = 0.64), shock at presentation (P = 0.19), and mechanism of injury (P = 0.11) did not influence the choice of imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal trauma imaging in this setting was majorly via ultrasound and abdominal radiographs. Factors suggested to influence the pattern of abdominal trauma imaging in LMICs include the availability of specific imaging modality, cost, lack of standardisation and definite abdominal trauma protocols. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10204914/ /pubmed/37228879 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_273_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of the West African College of Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Adenuga, Adedire Timilehin
Adeyeye, Ademola
Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients
title Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients
title_full Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients
title_fullStr Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients
title_full_unstemmed Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients
title_short Abdominal Trauma Imaging in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital—Our Experience with 87 Adult Patients
title_sort abdominal trauma imaging in a nigerian tertiary hospital—our experience with 87 adult patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37228879
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_273_22
work_keys_str_mv AT adenugaadediretimilehin abdominaltraumaimaginginanigeriantertiaryhospitalourexperiencewith87adultpatients
AT adeyeyeademola abdominaltraumaimaginginanigeriantertiaryhospitalourexperiencewith87adultpatients