Cargando…
Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICGFA) has been deployed to tackle malperfusion-related anastomotic complications. This study assesses variations in operator interpretation of pre-anastomotic ICGFA inflow in the gastric conduit. Utilizing an innovative online interactive multimedia platf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac016 |
_version_ | 1785045947165704192 |
---|---|
author | Hardy, Niall P Joosten, Johanna J Dalli, Jeffrey Hompes, Roel Cahill, Ronan A van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I |
author_facet | Hardy, Niall P Joosten, Johanna J Dalli, Jeffrey Hompes, Roel Cahill, Ronan A van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I |
author_sort | Hardy, Niall P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICGFA) has been deployed to tackle malperfusion-related anastomotic complications. This study assesses variations in operator interpretation of pre-anastomotic ICGFA inflow in the gastric conduit. Utilizing an innovative online interactive multimedia platform (Mindstamp), esophageal surgeons completed a baseline opinion-practice questionnaire and proceeded to interpret, and then digitally assign, a distal transection point on 8 ICGFA videos of esophageal resections (6 Ivor Lewis, 2 McKeown). Annotations regarding gastric conduit transection by ICGFA were compared between expert users versus non-expert participants using ImageJ to delineate longitudinal distances with Shapiro Wilk and t-tests to ascertain significance. Expert versus non-expert correlation was assessed via Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Thirty participants (13 consultants, 6 ICGFA experts) completed the study in all aspects. Of these, a high majority (29 participants) stated ICGFA should be used routinely with most (21, including 5/6 experts) stating that 11–50 cases were needed for competency in interpretation. Among users, there were wide variations in dosing (0.05–3 mg/kg) and practice impact. Agreement regarding ICGFA video interpretation concerning transection level among experts was ‘moderate’ (ICC = 0.717) overall but ‘good’ (ICC = 0.871) among seven videos with Leave One Out (LOO) exclusion of the video with highest disagreement. Agreement among non-experts was moderate (ICC = 0.641) overall and in every subgroup including among consultants (ICC = 0.626). Experts choose levels that preserved more gastric conduit length versus non-experts in all but one video (P = 0.02). Considerable variability exists with ICGFA interpretation and indeed impact. Even adept users may be challenged in specific cases. Standardized training and/or computerized quantitative fluorescence may help better usage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10204994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102049942023-05-24 Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery Hardy, Niall P Joosten, Johanna J Dalli, Jeffrey Hompes, Roel Cahill, Ronan A van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I Dis Esophagus Original Article Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICGFA) has been deployed to tackle malperfusion-related anastomotic complications. This study assesses variations in operator interpretation of pre-anastomotic ICGFA inflow in the gastric conduit. Utilizing an innovative online interactive multimedia platform (Mindstamp), esophageal surgeons completed a baseline opinion-practice questionnaire and proceeded to interpret, and then digitally assign, a distal transection point on 8 ICGFA videos of esophageal resections (6 Ivor Lewis, 2 McKeown). Annotations regarding gastric conduit transection by ICGFA were compared between expert users versus non-expert participants using ImageJ to delineate longitudinal distances with Shapiro Wilk and t-tests to ascertain significance. Expert versus non-expert correlation was assessed via Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Thirty participants (13 consultants, 6 ICGFA experts) completed the study in all aspects. Of these, a high majority (29 participants) stated ICGFA should be used routinely with most (21, including 5/6 experts) stating that 11–50 cases were needed for competency in interpretation. Among users, there were wide variations in dosing (0.05–3 mg/kg) and practice impact. Agreement regarding ICGFA video interpretation concerning transection level among experts was ‘moderate’ (ICC = 0.717) overall but ‘good’ (ICC = 0.871) among seven videos with Leave One Out (LOO) exclusion of the video with highest disagreement. Agreement among non-experts was moderate (ICC = 0.641) overall and in every subgroup including among consultants (ICC = 0.626). Experts choose levels that preserved more gastric conduit length versus non-experts in all but one video (P = 0.02). Considerable variability exists with ICGFA interpretation and indeed impact. Even adept users may be challenged in specific cases. Standardized training and/or computerized quantitative fluorescence may help better usage. Oxford University Press 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10204994/ /pubmed/35428892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac016 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hardy, Niall P Joosten, Johanna J Dalli, Jeffrey Hompes, Roel Cahill, Ronan A van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
title | Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
title_full | Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
title_short | Evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
title_sort | evaluation of inter-user variability in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess gastric conduit perfusion in esophageal cancer surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardyniallp evaluationofinteruservariabilityinindocyaninegreenfluorescenceangiographytoassessgastricconduitperfusioninesophagealcancersurgery AT joostenjohannaj evaluationofinteruservariabilityinindocyaninegreenfluorescenceangiographytoassessgastricconduitperfusioninesophagealcancersurgery AT dallijeffrey evaluationofinteruservariabilityinindocyaninegreenfluorescenceangiographytoassessgastricconduitperfusioninesophagealcancersurgery AT hompesroel evaluationofinteruservariabilityinindocyaninegreenfluorescenceangiographytoassessgastricconduitperfusioninesophagealcancersurgery AT cahillronana evaluationofinteruservariabilityinindocyaninegreenfluorescenceangiographytoassessgastricconduitperfusioninesophagealcancersurgery AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki evaluationofinteruservariabilityinindocyaninegreenfluorescenceangiographytoassessgastricconduitperfusioninesophagealcancersurgery |