Cargando…

Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words

Partial speech input is often understood to trigger rapid and automatic activation of successively higher-level representations of words, from sound to meaning. Here we show evidence from magnetoencephalography that this type of incremental processing is limited when words are heard in isolation as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaston, Phoebe, Brodbeck, Christian, Phillips, Colin, Lau, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00084
_version_ 1785045961102327808
author Gaston, Phoebe
Brodbeck, Christian
Phillips, Colin
Lau, Ellen
author_facet Gaston, Phoebe
Brodbeck, Christian
Phillips, Colin
Lau, Ellen
author_sort Gaston, Phoebe
collection PubMed
description Partial speech input is often understood to trigger rapid and automatic activation of successively higher-level representations of words, from sound to meaning. Here we show evidence from magnetoencephalography that this type of incremental processing is limited when words are heard in isolation as compared to continuous speech. This suggests a less unified and automatic word recognition process than is often assumed. We present evidence from isolated words that neural effects of phoneme probability, quantified by phoneme surprisal, are significantly stronger than (statistically null) effects of phoneme-by-phoneme lexical uncertainty, quantified by cohort entropy. In contrast, we find robust effects of both cohort entropy and phoneme surprisal during perception of connected speech, with a significant interaction between the contexts. This dissociation rules out models of word recognition in which phoneme surprisal and cohort entropy are common indicators of a uniform process, even though these closely related information-theoretic measures both arise from the probability distribution of wordforms consistent with the input. We propose that phoneme surprisal effects reflect automatic access of a lower level of representation of the auditory input (e.g., wordforms) while the occurrence of cohort entropy effects is task sensitive, driven by a competition process or a higher-level representation that is engaged late (or not at all) during the processing of single words.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10205071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102050712023-05-24 Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words Gaston, Phoebe Brodbeck, Christian Phillips, Colin Lau, Ellen Neurobiol Lang (Camb) Research Article Partial speech input is often understood to trigger rapid and automatic activation of successively higher-level representations of words, from sound to meaning. Here we show evidence from magnetoencephalography that this type of incremental processing is limited when words are heard in isolation as compared to continuous speech. This suggests a less unified and automatic word recognition process than is often assumed. We present evidence from isolated words that neural effects of phoneme probability, quantified by phoneme surprisal, are significantly stronger than (statistically null) effects of phoneme-by-phoneme lexical uncertainty, quantified by cohort entropy. In contrast, we find robust effects of both cohort entropy and phoneme surprisal during perception of connected speech, with a significant interaction between the contexts. This dissociation rules out models of word recognition in which phoneme surprisal and cohort entropy are common indicators of a uniform process, even though these closely related information-theoretic measures both arise from the probability distribution of wordforms consistent with the input. We propose that phoneme surprisal effects reflect automatic access of a lower level of representation of the auditory input (e.g., wordforms) while the occurrence of cohort entropy effects is task sensitive, driven by a competition process or a higher-level representation that is engaged late (or not at all) during the processing of single words. MIT Press 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10205071/ /pubmed/37229141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00084 Text en © 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gaston, Phoebe
Brodbeck, Christian
Phillips, Colin
Lau, Ellen
Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words
title Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words
title_full Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words
title_fullStr Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words
title_short Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words
title_sort auditory word comprehension is less incremental in isolated words
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00084
work_keys_str_mv AT gastonphoebe auditorywordcomprehensionislessincrementalinisolatedwords
AT brodbeckchristian auditorywordcomprehensionislessincrementalinisolatedwords
AT phillipscolin auditorywordcomprehensionislessincrementalinisolatedwords
AT lauellen auditorywordcomprehensionislessincrementalinisolatedwords