Cargando…
Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study
To assess the accuracy of BMI compared to directly measured dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry percent body fat (DEXA %BF) among a worker compensation population. METHODS: The agreement between BMI and DEXA %BF was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient among 1394 evaluable patients over a 5-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000428 |
_version_ | 1785046029951827968 |
---|---|
author | Hyman, Mark H. Peled, Tamra J. Hyman, Noah M. Tan, Jingyi Guo, Xiuqing Rotter, Jerome I. |
author_facet | Hyman, Mark H. Peled, Tamra J. Hyman, Noah M. Tan, Jingyi Guo, Xiuqing Rotter, Jerome I. |
author_sort | Hyman, Mark H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the accuracy of BMI compared to directly measured dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry percent body fat (DEXA %BF) among a worker compensation population. METHODS: The agreement between BMI and DEXA %BF was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient among 1394 evaluable patients over a 5-year period. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to measure how well BMI can identify true obese and nonobese individuals. RESULTS: Using at least 30kg/m(2) to identify obesity, BNI had a specificity of 0.658 and a sensitivity of 0.735. The correlation was better in females at 0.66, compared to males at 0.55, and weaker in older age groups at 0.42, as compared to the youngest age group at 0.59. Overall, 29.8% of the population was reclassified based on their DEXA %BF measures. CONCLUSIONS: In a 5-year cohort worker compensation population, BMI was an inaccurate measure of true obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10205388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102053882023-05-24 Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study Hyman, Mark H. Peled, Tamra J. Hyman, Noah M. Tan, Jingyi Guo, Xiuqing Rotter, Jerome I. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research To assess the accuracy of BMI compared to directly measured dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry percent body fat (DEXA %BF) among a worker compensation population. METHODS: The agreement between BMI and DEXA %BF was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient among 1394 evaluable patients over a 5-year period. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to measure how well BMI can identify true obese and nonobese individuals. RESULTS: Using at least 30kg/m(2) to identify obesity, BNI had a specificity of 0.658 and a sensitivity of 0.735. The correlation was better in females at 0.66, compared to males at 0.55, and weaker in older age groups at 0.42, as compared to the youngest age group at 0.59. Overall, 29.8% of the population was reclassified based on their DEXA %BF measures. CONCLUSIONS: In a 5-year cohort worker compensation population, BMI was an inaccurate measure of true obesity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10205388/ /pubmed/37229091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000428 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hyman, Mark H. Peled, Tamra J. Hyman, Noah M. Tan, Jingyi Guo, Xiuqing Rotter, Jerome I. Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
title | Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | differences in bmi obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hymanmarkh differencesinbmiobesitymeasuresinaworkerscompensationpopulationacrosssectionalstudy AT peledtamraj differencesinbmiobesitymeasuresinaworkerscompensationpopulationacrosssectionalstudy AT hymannoahm differencesinbmiobesitymeasuresinaworkerscompensationpopulationacrosssectionalstudy AT tanjingyi differencesinbmiobesitymeasuresinaworkerscompensationpopulationacrosssectionalstudy AT guoxiuqing differencesinbmiobesitymeasuresinaworkerscompensationpopulationacrosssectionalstudy AT rotterjeromei differencesinbmiobesitymeasuresinaworkerscompensationpopulationacrosssectionalstudy |