Cargando…

Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

BACKGROUND: Patients with a pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may have concurrent adjacent segment disease (ASD). Although prior studies have shown posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) is effective in repairing pseudarthrosis, improvement in patient re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Grant O., Glassman, Steven D., Tomov, Marko, Dimar, John R., Crawford, Charles H., Carreon, Leah Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100223
_version_ 1785046049196343296
author Schmidt, Grant O.
Glassman, Steven D.
Tomov, Marko
Dimar, John R.
Crawford, Charles H.
Carreon, Leah Y.
author_facet Schmidt, Grant O.
Glassman, Steven D.
Tomov, Marko
Dimar, John R.
Crawford, Charles H.
Carreon, Leah Y.
author_sort Schmidt, Grant O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with a pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may have concurrent adjacent segment disease (ASD). Although prior studies have shown posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) is effective in repairing pseudarthrosis, improvement in patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been marginal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PCDF in achieving symptom relief in patients with pseudarthrosis after ACDF and whether that is altered by the additional treatment of ASD. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with pseudarthrosis were compared with 31 patients with pseudarthrosis and concurrent ASD after ACDF who underwent revision PCDF with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes measures included the neck disability index (NDI), and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for neck and arm pain. Secondary measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operating room (OR) time, and length of stay. RESULTS: Demographics between cohorts were similar, however there was a significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) in the group with concurrent ASD (32.23 vs. 27.76, p=.007). Patients with concurrent ASD had more levels fused during PCDF (3.7 vs. 1.9, p<.001), greater EBL (165 cc vs. 106 cc, p=.054), and longer OR time (256 minutes vs. 202 minutes, p<.000). Preoperative PROs for NDI (56.7 vs. 56.5, p=.954), NRS arm pain (5.9 vs. 5.7, p=.758), and NRS neck pain (6.6 vs. 6.8, p=.726) were similar in both cohorts. At 12 months patients with concurrent ASD experienced a slightly greater, but not statistically significant, improvement in PROs (Δ NDI 4.40 vs. -1.44, Δ NRS neck pain 1.17 vs. 0.42, Δ NRS arm pain 1.28 vs. 0.10, p=.107). CONCLUSIONS: PCDF is a standard procedure for treatment of pseudarthrosis following ACDF, however improvements in PROs are marginal. Slightly greater improvements were seen in patients whose indication for surgery also included concurrent ASD, rather than a diagnosis of pseudarthrosis alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10205481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102054812023-05-24 Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Schmidt, Grant O. Glassman, Steven D. Tomov, Marko Dimar, John R. Crawford, Charles H. Carreon, Leah Y. N Am Spine Soc J Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: Patients with a pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may have concurrent adjacent segment disease (ASD). Although prior studies have shown posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) is effective in repairing pseudarthrosis, improvement in patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been marginal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PCDF in achieving symptom relief in patients with pseudarthrosis after ACDF and whether that is altered by the additional treatment of ASD. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with pseudarthrosis were compared with 31 patients with pseudarthrosis and concurrent ASD after ACDF who underwent revision PCDF with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes measures included the neck disability index (NDI), and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for neck and arm pain. Secondary measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operating room (OR) time, and length of stay. RESULTS: Demographics between cohorts were similar, however there was a significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) in the group with concurrent ASD (32.23 vs. 27.76, p=.007). Patients with concurrent ASD had more levels fused during PCDF (3.7 vs. 1.9, p<.001), greater EBL (165 cc vs. 106 cc, p=.054), and longer OR time (256 minutes vs. 202 minutes, p<.000). Preoperative PROs for NDI (56.7 vs. 56.5, p=.954), NRS arm pain (5.9 vs. 5.7, p=.758), and NRS neck pain (6.6 vs. 6.8, p=.726) were similar in both cohorts. At 12 months patients with concurrent ASD experienced a slightly greater, but not statistically significant, improvement in PROs (Δ NDI 4.40 vs. -1.44, Δ NRS neck pain 1.17 vs. 0.42, Δ NRS arm pain 1.28 vs. 0.10, p=.107). CONCLUSIONS: PCDF is a standard procedure for treatment of pseudarthrosis following ACDF, however improvements in PROs are marginal. Slightly greater improvements were seen in patients whose indication for surgery also included concurrent ASD, rather than a diagnosis of pseudarthrosis alone. Elsevier 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10205481/ /pubmed/37229209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100223 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Schmidt, Grant O.
Glassman, Steven D.
Tomov, Marko
Dimar, John R.
Crawford, Charles H.
Carreon, Leah Y.
Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_full Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_fullStr Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_short Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_sort comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100223
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtgranto comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT glassmanstevend comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT tomovmarko comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT dimarjohnr comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT crawfordcharlesh comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT carreonleahy comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion