Cargando…
Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity
Moth populations have declined across large parts of north-western Europe since the mid-20th century due, in part, to agricultural intensification. Agri-environment schemes (AES) are widely implemented across Europe to protect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Grass field margins enriched wit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-023-00469-9 |
_version_ | 1785046112036454400 |
---|---|
author | Blumgart, Dan Botham, Marc S. Menéndez, Rosa Bell, James R. |
author_facet | Blumgart, Dan Botham, Marc S. Menéndez, Rosa Bell, James R. |
author_sort | Blumgart, Dan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Moth populations have declined across large parts of north-western Europe since the mid-20th century due, in part, to agricultural intensification. Agri-environment schemes (AES) are widely implemented across Europe to protect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Grass field margins enriched with wildflowers typically out-perform grass-only margins in terms of increasing insect abundance and diversity. However, the effect of wildflower enrichment on moths remains largely unstudied. Here, the relative importance of larval hostplants and nectar resources for adult moths within AES field margins are investigated. Two treatments and a control were compared: (i) a plain grass mix, the control, (ii) a grass mix enriched with only moth-pollinated flowers, and (iii) a grass mix enriched with 13 wildflower species. Abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity were up to 1.4, 1.8 and 3.5 times higher, respectively, in the wildflower treatment compared to plain grass. The difference in diversity between treatments became greater in the second year. There was no difference in total abundance, richness or diversity between the plain grass treatment and grass enriched with moth-pollinated flowers. The increase in abundance and diversity in the wildflower treatment was due primarily to the provision of larval hostplants, with nectar provision playing a smaller role. The relative abundance of species whose larval hostplants included sown wildflowers increased in the second year, suggesting colonisation of the new habitat. Implications for insect conservation. We show that, at the farm scale, moth diversity can be greatly enhanced and abundance moderately enhanced by sowing diverse wildflower margins, providing these insects with both larval hostplants and floral resources, compared to grass-only margins. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10841-023-00469-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10205847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102058472023-05-25 Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity Blumgart, Dan Botham, Marc S. Menéndez, Rosa Bell, James R. J Insect Conserv Original Paper Moth populations have declined across large parts of north-western Europe since the mid-20th century due, in part, to agricultural intensification. Agri-environment schemes (AES) are widely implemented across Europe to protect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Grass field margins enriched with wildflowers typically out-perform grass-only margins in terms of increasing insect abundance and diversity. However, the effect of wildflower enrichment on moths remains largely unstudied. Here, the relative importance of larval hostplants and nectar resources for adult moths within AES field margins are investigated. Two treatments and a control were compared: (i) a plain grass mix, the control, (ii) a grass mix enriched with only moth-pollinated flowers, and (iii) a grass mix enriched with 13 wildflower species. Abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity were up to 1.4, 1.8 and 3.5 times higher, respectively, in the wildflower treatment compared to plain grass. The difference in diversity between treatments became greater in the second year. There was no difference in total abundance, richness or diversity between the plain grass treatment and grass enriched with moth-pollinated flowers. The increase in abundance and diversity in the wildflower treatment was due primarily to the provision of larval hostplants, with nectar provision playing a smaller role. The relative abundance of species whose larval hostplants included sown wildflowers increased in the second year, suggesting colonisation of the new habitat. Implications for insect conservation. We show that, at the farm scale, moth diversity can be greatly enhanced and abundance moderately enhanced by sowing diverse wildflower margins, providing these insects with both larval hostplants and floral resources, compared to grass-only margins. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10841-023-00469-9. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10205847/ /pubmed/37234225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-023-00469-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Blumgart, Dan Botham, Marc S. Menéndez, Rosa Bell, James R. Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
title | Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
title_full | Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
title_fullStr | Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
title_short | Floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
title_sort | floral enhancement of arable field margins increases moth abundance and diversity |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-023-00469-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blumgartdan floralenhancementofarablefieldmarginsincreasesmothabundanceanddiversity AT bothammarcs floralenhancementofarablefieldmarginsincreasesmothabundanceanddiversity AT menendezrosa floralenhancementofarablefieldmarginsincreasesmothabundanceanddiversity AT belljamesr floralenhancementofarablefieldmarginsincreasesmothabundanceanddiversity |