Cargando…
Skeptical Arguments and Deep Disagreement
This paper provides a reinterpretation of some of the most influential skeptical arguments, Agrippa’s trilemma, meta-regress arguments, and Cartesian external world skepticism. These skeptical arguments are reasonably regarded as unsound arguments about the extent of our knowledge. However, reinterp...
Autor principal: | Melchior, Guido |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00433-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Rationally irresolvable disagreement
por: Melchior, Guido
Publicado: (2023) -
Is Circumcision “Necessary” in Islam? A Philosophical Argument Based on Peer Disagreement
por: Dabbagh, Hossein
Publicado: (2022) -
Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Respect and political disagreement: Can intergroup respect reduce the biased evaluation of outgroup arguments?
por: Eschert, Silke, et al.
Publicado: (2019)