Cargando…
Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02024-9 |
_version_ | 1785046116542185472 |
---|---|
author | Yagdiran, Ayla Paul, Gregor Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte Scheder-Bieschin, Justus Tobys, David Kernich, Nikolaus Eysel, Peer Jung, Norma |
author_facet | Yagdiran, Ayla Paul, Gregor Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte Scheder-Bieschin, Justus Tobys, David Kernich, Nikolaus Eysel, Peer Jung, Norma |
author_sort | Yagdiran, Ayla |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and to determine predictors for 1-year survival. METHODS: This is a single-center cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital. This is a retrospective analysis of Patients with VO who were prospectively enrolled into a spine registry from 2008 to 2019. Student’s t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test or Chi-square test were applied for group comparisons. Survival analysis was performed using a log-rank test and a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: 283 VO patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 44 (15.5%) had SIVO and 239 (84.5%) NVO. Patients with SIVO were significantly younger, had a lower Charlson comorbidity index and a shorter hospital stay compared to NVO. They also showed a higher rate of psoas abscesses and spinal empyema (38.6% [SIVO] vs. 20.9% [NVO]). Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (25%) were equally often detected in SIVO while S. aureus was more frequently than CNS in NVO (38.1% vs. 7.9%).Patients with SIVO (P = 0.04) had a higher 1-year survival rate (Fig. 1). After multivariate analysis, ASA score was associated with a lower 1-year survival in VO. CONCLUSION: The results from this study emphasize unique clinical features of SIVO, which warrant that SIVO should be estimated as a separate entity of VO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10205873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102058732023-05-25 Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? Yagdiran, Ayla Paul, Gregor Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte Scheder-Bieschin, Justus Tobys, David Kernich, Nikolaus Eysel, Peer Jung, Norma Infection Research PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and to determine predictors for 1-year survival. METHODS: This is a single-center cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital. This is a retrospective analysis of Patients with VO who were prospectively enrolled into a spine registry from 2008 to 2019. Student’s t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test or Chi-square test were applied for group comparisons. Survival analysis was performed using a log-rank test and a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: 283 VO patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 44 (15.5%) had SIVO and 239 (84.5%) NVO. Patients with SIVO were significantly younger, had a lower Charlson comorbidity index and a shorter hospital stay compared to NVO. They also showed a higher rate of psoas abscesses and spinal empyema (38.6% [SIVO] vs. 20.9% [NVO]). Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (25%) were equally often detected in SIVO while S. aureus was more frequently than CNS in NVO (38.1% vs. 7.9%).Patients with SIVO (P = 0.04) had a higher 1-year survival rate (Fig. 1). After multivariate analysis, ASA score was associated with a lower 1-year survival in VO. CONCLUSION: The results from this study emphasize unique clinical features of SIVO, which warrant that SIVO should be estimated as a separate entity of VO. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10205873/ /pubmed/37071309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02024-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Yagdiran, Ayla Paul, Gregor Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte Scheder-Bieschin, Justus Tobys, David Kernich, Nikolaus Eysel, Peer Jung, Norma Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
title | Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
title_full | Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
title_fullStr | Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
title_short | Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
title_sort | clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02024-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yagdiranayla clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT paulgregor clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT meyerschwickerathcharlotte clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT schederbieschinjustus clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT tobysdavid clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT kernichnikolaus clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT eyselpeer clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice AT jungnorma clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice |