Cargando…

Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?

PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yagdiran, Ayla, Paul, Gregor, Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte, Scheder-Bieschin, Justus, Tobys, David, Kernich, Nikolaus, Eysel, Peer, Jung, Norma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02024-9
_version_ 1785046116542185472
author Yagdiran, Ayla
Paul, Gregor
Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte
Scheder-Bieschin, Justus
Tobys, David
Kernich, Nikolaus
Eysel, Peer
Jung, Norma
author_facet Yagdiran, Ayla
Paul, Gregor
Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte
Scheder-Bieschin, Justus
Tobys, David
Kernich, Nikolaus
Eysel, Peer
Jung, Norma
author_sort Yagdiran, Ayla
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and to determine predictors for 1-year survival. METHODS: This is a single-center cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital. This is a retrospective analysis of Patients with VO who were prospectively enrolled into a spine registry from 2008 to 2019. Student’s t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test or Chi-square test were applied for group comparisons. Survival analysis was performed using a log-rank test and a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: 283 VO patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 44 (15.5%) had SIVO and 239 (84.5%) NVO. Patients with SIVO were significantly younger, had a lower Charlson comorbidity index and a shorter hospital stay compared to NVO. They also showed a higher rate of psoas abscesses and spinal empyema (38.6% [SIVO] vs. 20.9% [NVO]). Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (25%) were equally often detected in SIVO while S. aureus was more frequently than CNS in NVO (38.1% vs. 7.9%).Patients with SIVO (P = 0.04) had a higher 1-year survival rate (Fig. 1). After multivariate analysis, ASA score was associated with a lower 1-year survival in VO. CONCLUSION: The results from this study emphasize unique clinical features of SIVO, which warrant that SIVO should be estimated as a separate entity of VO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10205873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102058732023-05-25 Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price? Yagdiran, Ayla Paul, Gregor Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte Scheder-Bieschin, Justus Tobys, David Kernich, Nikolaus Eysel, Peer Jung, Norma Infection Research PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and to determine predictors for 1-year survival. METHODS: This is a single-center cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital. This is a retrospective analysis of Patients with VO who were prospectively enrolled into a spine registry from 2008 to 2019. Student’s t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test or Chi-square test were applied for group comparisons. Survival analysis was performed using a log-rank test and a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: 283 VO patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 44 (15.5%) had SIVO and 239 (84.5%) NVO. Patients with SIVO were significantly younger, had a lower Charlson comorbidity index and a shorter hospital stay compared to NVO. They also showed a higher rate of psoas abscesses and spinal empyema (38.6% [SIVO] vs. 20.9% [NVO]). Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (25%) were equally often detected in SIVO while S. aureus was more frequently than CNS in NVO (38.1% vs. 7.9%).Patients with SIVO (P = 0.04) had a higher 1-year survival rate (Fig. 1). After multivariate analysis, ASA score was associated with a lower 1-year survival in VO. CONCLUSION: The results from this study emphasize unique clinical features of SIVO, which warrant that SIVO should be estimated as a separate entity of VO. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10205873/ /pubmed/37071309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02024-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Yagdiran, Ayla
Paul, Gregor
Meyer-Schwickerath, Charlotte
Scheder-Bieschin, Justus
Tobys, David
Kernich, Nikolaus
Eysel, Peer
Jung, Norma
Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
title Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
title_full Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
title_fullStr Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
title_short Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
title_sort clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02024-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yagdiranayla clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT paulgregor clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT meyerschwickerathcharlotte clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT schederbieschinjustus clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT tobysdavid clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT kernichnikolaus clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT eyselpeer clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice
AT jungnorma clinicalfeaturesandoutcomeofvertebralosteomyelitisafterspinalinjectionisitworththeprice