Cargando…

Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Most living kidney donors are members of a hemodialysis patient’s social network. Network members are divided into core members, those strongly connected to the patient and other members; and peripheral members, those weakly connected to the patient and other members. We i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie, Avrum, Daw, Jonathan, Brown, Riley, Cappiello, Jamie, Lee, Briana Eugene, Fink, Edward L., Gardiner, Heather M., Reese, Peter P., Gadegbeku, Crystal A., Obradovic, Zoran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100640
_version_ 1785046177393147904
author Gillespie, Avrum
Daw, Jonathan
Brown, Riley
Cappiello, Jamie
Lee, Briana Eugene
Fink, Edward L.
Gardiner, Heather M.
Reese, Peter P.
Gadegbeku, Crystal A.
Obradovic, Zoran
author_facet Gillespie, Avrum
Daw, Jonathan
Brown, Riley
Cappiello, Jamie
Lee, Briana Eugene
Fink, Edward L.
Gardiner, Heather M.
Reese, Peter P.
Gadegbeku, Crystal A.
Obradovic, Zoran
author_sort Gillespie, Avrum
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Most living kidney donors are members of a hemodialysis patient’s social network. Network members are divided into core members, those strongly connected to the patient and other members; and peripheral members, those weakly connected to the patient and other members. We identify how many hemodialysis patients’ network members offered to become kidney donors, whether these offers were from core or peripheral network members, and whose offers the patients accepted. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional interviewer-administered hemodialysis patient social network survey. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent hemodialysis patients in 2 facilities. PREDICTORS: Network size and constraint, a donation from a peripheral network member. OUTCOMES: Number of living donor offers, accepting an offer. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We performed egocentric network analyses for all participants. Poisson regression models evaluated associations between network measures and number of offers. Logistic regression models determined the associations between network factors and accepting a donation offer. RESULTS: The mean age of the 106 participants was 60 years. Forty-five percent were female, and 75% self-identified as Black. Fifty-two percent of participants received at least one living donor offer (range 1-6); 42% of the offers were from peripheral members. Participants with larger networks received more offers (incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.42; P = 0.001), including networks with more peripheral members (constraint, IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98; P < 0.001). Participants who received a peripheral member offer had 3.6 times greater odds of accepting an offer (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.15-10.8; P = 0.02) than those who did not receive a peripheral member offer. LIMITATIONS: A small sample of only hemodialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants received at least one living donor offer, often from peripheral network members. Future living donor interventions should focus on both core and peripheral network members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102062082023-05-25 Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers Gillespie, Avrum Daw, Jonathan Brown, Riley Cappiello, Jamie Lee, Briana Eugene Fink, Edward L. Gardiner, Heather M. Reese, Peter P. Gadegbeku, Crystal A. Obradovic, Zoran Kidney Med Original Research RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Most living kidney donors are members of a hemodialysis patient’s social network. Network members are divided into core members, those strongly connected to the patient and other members; and peripheral members, those weakly connected to the patient and other members. We identify how many hemodialysis patients’ network members offered to become kidney donors, whether these offers were from core or peripheral network members, and whose offers the patients accepted. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional interviewer-administered hemodialysis patient social network survey. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent hemodialysis patients in 2 facilities. PREDICTORS: Network size and constraint, a donation from a peripheral network member. OUTCOMES: Number of living donor offers, accepting an offer. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We performed egocentric network analyses for all participants. Poisson regression models evaluated associations between network measures and number of offers. Logistic regression models determined the associations between network factors and accepting a donation offer. RESULTS: The mean age of the 106 participants was 60 years. Forty-five percent were female, and 75% self-identified as Black. Fifty-two percent of participants received at least one living donor offer (range 1-6); 42% of the offers were from peripheral members. Participants with larger networks received more offers (incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.42; P = 0.001), including networks with more peripheral members (constraint, IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98; P < 0.001). Participants who received a peripheral member offer had 3.6 times greater odds of accepting an offer (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.15-10.8; P = 0.02) than those who did not receive a peripheral member offer. LIMITATIONS: A small sample of only hemodialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants received at least one living donor offer, often from peripheral network members. Future living donor interventions should focus on both core and peripheral network members. Elsevier 2023-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10206208/ /pubmed/37235041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100640 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gillespie, Avrum
Daw, Jonathan
Brown, Riley
Cappiello, Jamie
Lee, Briana Eugene
Fink, Edward L.
Gardiner, Heather M.
Reese, Peter P.
Gadegbeku, Crystal A.
Obradovic, Zoran
Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers
title Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers
title_full Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers
title_fullStr Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers
title_full_unstemmed Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers
title_short Dialysis Patients’ Social Networks and Living Donation Offers
title_sort dialysis patients’ social networks and living donation offers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100640
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespieavrum dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT dawjonathan dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT brownriley dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT cappiellojamie dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT leebrianaeugene dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT finkedwardl dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT gardinerheatherm dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT reesepeterp dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT gadegbekucrystala dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers
AT obradoviczoran dialysispatientssocialnetworksandlivingdonationoffers