Cargando…

Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic created a requirement for reduced patient contact and reduced capacity in clinics. We previously published results of an Image-Based Eyelid Lesion Management Service (IBELMS) which was found non-inferior to traditional face-to-face clinic at diagnosing lesions and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillam, Matthew, Younus, Osman, Loo, Shi-Pei, Connolly, Julie, Cauchi, Paul, Gregory, Marilena, Drummond, Suzy, Chadha, Vikas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02572-2
_version_ 1785145855588696064
author Gillam, Matthew
Younus, Osman
Loo, Shi-Pei
Connolly, Julie
Cauchi, Paul
Gregory, Marilena
Drummond, Suzy
Chadha, Vikas
author_facet Gillam, Matthew
Younus, Osman
Loo, Shi-Pei
Connolly, Julie
Cauchi, Paul
Gregory, Marilena
Drummond, Suzy
Chadha, Vikas
author_sort Gillam, Matthew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic created a requirement for reduced patient contact and reduced capacity in clinics. We previously published results of an Image-Based Eyelid Lesion Management Service (IBELMS) which was found non-inferior to traditional face-to-face clinic at diagnosing lesions and identifying eyelid malignancies. We now present first-year safety and efficacy data from this service. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on all patients seen in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde eyelid photography clinics from 30(th) September 2020 to 29(th) September 2021, including referral source and diagnosis, time to clinic review, treatment and patient outcomes. RESULTS: 808 patients were included in the study. Chalazion was the most common diagnoses recorded (38.4%). There was a statistically significant decrease in mean time from referral to appointment time between the first 4 months and last 4 months of the service (93 days to 22 days, p ≤ 0.0001). 266 (33%) of patients were discharged following photographs, 45 (6%) were discharged for non-attendance and 371 (46%) were booked for a minor procedure. 13 biopsy-confirmed malignant lesions were identified; only 3 had been referred as suspected malignancy. 23 patients out of 330 with at least 6 months follow up (7%) were re-referred within 6 months of treatment or discharge; however, none of them with a missed periocular malignancy. DISCUSSION: Eyelid photography clinics effectively reduce patient waiting times and maximise clinic capacity. They accurately identify eyelid lesions including malignancies with a low re-referral rate. We propose that an image-based service for eyelid lesions is a safe and effective way of managing such patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102063362023-11-30 Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective? Gillam, Matthew Younus, Osman Loo, Shi-Pei Connolly, Julie Cauchi, Paul Gregory, Marilena Drummond, Suzy Chadha, Vikas Eye (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic created a requirement for reduced patient contact and reduced capacity in clinics. We previously published results of an Image-Based Eyelid Lesion Management Service (IBELMS) which was found non-inferior to traditional face-to-face clinic at diagnosing lesions and identifying eyelid malignancies. We now present first-year safety and efficacy data from this service. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on all patients seen in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde eyelid photography clinics from 30(th) September 2020 to 29(th) September 2021, including referral source and diagnosis, time to clinic review, treatment and patient outcomes. RESULTS: 808 patients were included in the study. Chalazion was the most common diagnoses recorded (38.4%). There was a statistically significant decrease in mean time from referral to appointment time between the first 4 months and last 4 months of the service (93 days to 22 days, p ≤ 0.0001). 266 (33%) of patients were discharged following photographs, 45 (6%) were discharged for non-attendance and 371 (46%) were booked for a minor procedure. 13 biopsy-confirmed malignant lesions were identified; only 3 had been referred as suspected malignancy. 23 patients out of 330 with at least 6 months follow up (7%) were re-referred within 6 months of treatment or discharge; however, none of them with a missed periocular malignancy. DISCUSSION: Eyelid photography clinics effectively reduce patient waiting times and maximise clinic capacity. They accurately identify eyelid lesions including malignancies with a low re-referral rate. We propose that an image-based service for eyelid lesions is a safe and effective way of managing such patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-24 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10206336/ /pubmed/37225825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02572-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gillam, Matthew
Younus, Osman
Loo, Shi-Pei
Connolly, Julie
Cauchi, Paul
Gregory, Marilena
Drummond, Suzy
Chadha, Vikas
Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
title Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
title_full Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
title_fullStr Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
title_full_unstemmed Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
title_short Is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
title_sort is an image-based eyelid management service safe and effective?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02572-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gillammatthew isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT younusosman isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT looshipei isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT connollyjulie isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT cauchipaul isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT gregorymarilena isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT drummondsuzy isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective
AT chadhavikas isanimagebasedeyelidmanagementservicesafeandeffective