Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study

Background: The bond between the dentin and restorative material contributes to the success of the restoration. Structural changes associated with prepared dentin may influence the bonding of restorative materials. The present study evaluates the bond between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nair, Megha, Rao, Arathi, Kukkila, Jayaprakash, Natarajan, Srikant, Baranya Srikrishna, Suprabha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234338
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131919.1
_version_ 1785046232100503552
author Nair, Megha
Rao, Arathi
Kukkila, Jayaprakash
Natarajan, Srikant
Baranya Srikrishna, Suprabha
author_facet Nair, Megha
Rao, Arathi
Kukkila, Jayaprakash
Natarajan, Srikant
Baranya Srikrishna, Suprabha
author_sort Nair, Megha
collection PubMed
description Background: The bond between the dentin and restorative material contributes to the success of the restoration. Structural changes associated with prepared dentin may influence the bonding of restorative materials. The present study evaluates the bond between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie Care (TM) and conventional caries removal in primary teeth. Methods: 52 primary teeth with dentinal caries were randomly grouped into group I, where caries removal was done using the conventional method, and group II which used Carie Care (TM). All the teeth were restored using RMGIC. Micro shear bond strength between the residual dentin and the cement was tested using universal testing machine and the dye penetration method was used for microleakage testing. Independent t-test was performed for intergroup comparison. Pearson chi-square test was carried out to evaluate the microleakage patterns in the enamel and dentin. Results: The mean micro-shear bond strength of group I was 6.03±1.6 and that of group II was 8.54±2.92; this difference was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.012. Microleakage was higher in the test group (1.38±0.51) than the control group (0.77±0.6) and was significant with a p -value of .036. Conclusions: Papain-based chemomechanical agent Carie Care (TM) can be used as an alternative method to conventional caries removal. However, further studies need to explore methods to improve the marginal sealing capacity of RMGIC to the residual dentin after chemomechanical caries removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102064422023-05-25 A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study Nair, Megha Rao, Arathi Kukkila, Jayaprakash Natarajan, Srikant Baranya Srikrishna, Suprabha F1000Res Research Article Background: The bond between the dentin and restorative material contributes to the success of the restoration. Structural changes associated with prepared dentin may influence the bonding of restorative materials. The present study evaluates the bond between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie Care (TM) and conventional caries removal in primary teeth. Methods: 52 primary teeth with dentinal caries were randomly grouped into group I, where caries removal was done using the conventional method, and group II which used Carie Care (TM). All the teeth were restored using RMGIC. Micro shear bond strength between the residual dentin and the cement was tested using universal testing machine and the dye penetration method was used for microleakage testing. Independent t-test was performed for intergroup comparison. Pearson chi-square test was carried out to evaluate the microleakage patterns in the enamel and dentin. Results: The mean micro-shear bond strength of group I was 6.03±1.6 and that of group II was 8.54±2.92; this difference was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.012. Microleakage was higher in the test group (1.38±0.51) than the control group (0.77±0.6) and was significant with a p -value of .036. Conclusions: Papain-based chemomechanical agent Carie Care (TM) can be used as an alternative method to conventional caries removal. However, further studies need to explore methods to improve the marginal sealing capacity of RMGIC to the residual dentin after chemomechanical caries removal. F1000 Research Limited 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206442/ /pubmed/37234338 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131919.1 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Nair M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nair, Megha
Rao, Arathi
Kukkila, Jayaprakash
Natarajan, Srikant
Baranya Srikrishna, Suprabha
A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
title A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using Carie CareTM and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of micro shear bond strength and microleakage between the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and residual dentin following excavation of carious dentin using carie caretm and conventional caries removal in primary teeth: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37234338
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131919.1
work_keys_str_mv AT nairmegha acomparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT raoarathi acomparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT kukkilajayaprakash acomparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT natarajansrikant acomparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT baranyasrikrishnasuprabha acomparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT nairmegha comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT raoarathi comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT kukkilajayaprakash comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT natarajansrikant comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT baranyasrikrishnasuprabha comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthandmicroleakagebetweentheresinmodifiedglassionomercementandresidualdentinfollowingexcavationofcariousdentinusingcariecaretmandconventionalcariesremovalinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy