Cargando…

Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: The traumatic brain injury (TBI) Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP) is an innovative modality for delivering evidence-based treatments in a residential, inpatient format to special operational forces service members and veterans with mild TBI. IETPs provide bundled evidenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haun, Jolie N, Nakase-Richardson, Risa, Melillo, Christine, Kean, Jacob, Benzinger, Rachel C, Schneider, Tali, Pugh, Mary Jo V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37159250
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/44776
_version_ 1785046271405326336
author Haun, Jolie N
Nakase-Richardson, Risa
Melillo, Christine
Kean, Jacob
Benzinger, Rachel C
Schneider, Tali
Pugh, Mary Jo V
author_facet Haun, Jolie N
Nakase-Richardson, Risa
Melillo, Christine
Kean, Jacob
Benzinger, Rachel C
Schneider, Tali
Pugh, Mary Jo V
author_sort Haun, Jolie N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The traumatic brain injury (TBI) Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP) is an innovative modality for delivering evidence-based treatments in a residential, inpatient format to special operational forces service members and veterans with mild TBI. IETPs provide bundled evidence-based assessment, treatment, referral, and case management in concordance with the existing guidelines for mild TBI and commonly co-occurring comorbidities. To date, there has been no formal characterization or evaluation of the IETP to understand the determinants of implementation across the system of care. The goal of our partnered evaluation initiative (PEI) with an operational partner, the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation National Program Office, is to facilitate the full implementation of the IETP across all 5 Veterans Health Administration TBI–Centers of Excellence (TBI-COE) and to inform minimum standards while supporting the unique characteristics of each site. OBJECTIVE: This IETP partnered evaluation will describe each of the 5 TBI-COE IETP services and state of implementation to identify opportunities for adaptation and scale, characterize the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical services received, evaluate the outcomes for participants in the IETP, and inform ongoing implementation and knowledge translation efforts to support IETP expansion. In alignment with the goals of the protocol, ineffective treatment components will be targeted for deimplementation. METHODS: A 3-year concurrent mixed methods evaluation using a participatory approach in collaboration with the operational partner and TBI-COE site leadership will be conducted. Qualitative observations, semistructured focus groups, and interviewing methods will be used to describe IETP, stakeholder experiences and needs, and suggestions for IETP implementation. Quantitative methods will include primary data collection from patients in the IETP at each site to characterize long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with treatment and secondary data collection to quantitatively characterize patient-level and care system–level data. Finally, data sets will be triangulated to share data findings with partners to inform ongoing implementation efforts. RESULTS: Data collection began in December 2021 and is currently ongoing. The results and deliverables will inform IETP characterization, evaluation, implementation, and knowledge translation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evaluation seek to provide an understanding of the determinants affecting the implementation of IETPs. Service member, staff, and stakeholder insights will inform the state of implementation at each site, and quantitative measures will provide options for standardized outcome measures. This evaluation is expected to inform national Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Office policies and processes and knowledge translation efforts to improve and expand the IETP. Future work may include cost evaluations and rigorous research, such as randomized controlled trials. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44776
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102066252023-05-25 Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study Haun, Jolie N Nakase-Richardson, Risa Melillo, Christine Kean, Jacob Benzinger, Rachel C Schneider, Tali Pugh, Mary Jo V JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: The traumatic brain injury (TBI) Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP) is an innovative modality for delivering evidence-based treatments in a residential, inpatient format to special operational forces service members and veterans with mild TBI. IETPs provide bundled evidence-based assessment, treatment, referral, and case management in concordance with the existing guidelines for mild TBI and commonly co-occurring comorbidities. To date, there has been no formal characterization or evaluation of the IETP to understand the determinants of implementation across the system of care. The goal of our partnered evaluation initiative (PEI) with an operational partner, the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation National Program Office, is to facilitate the full implementation of the IETP across all 5 Veterans Health Administration TBI–Centers of Excellence (TBI-COE) and to inform minimum standards while supporting the unique characteristics of each site. OBJECTIVE: This IETP partnered evaluation will describe each of the 5 TBI-COE IETP services and state of implementation to identify opportunities for adaptation and scale, characterize the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical services received, evaluate the outcomes for participants in the IETP, and inform ongoing implementation and knowledge translation efforts to support IETP expansion. In alignment with the goals of the protocol, ineffective treatment components will be targeted for deimplementation. METHODS: A 3-year concurrent mixed methods evaluation using a participatory approach in collaboration with the operational partner and TBI-COE site leadership will be conducted. Qualitative observations, semistructured focus groups, and interviewing methods will be used to describe IETP, stakeholder experiences and needs, and suggestions for IETP implementation. Quantitative methods will include primary data collection from patients in the IETP at each site to characterize long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with treatment and secondary data collection to quantitatively characterize patient-level and care system–level data. Finally, data sets will be triangulated to share data findings with partners to inform ongoing implementation efforts. RESULTS: Data collection began in December 2021 and is currently ongoing. The results and deliverables will inform IETP characterization, evaluation, implementation, and knowledge translation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evaluation seek to provide an understanding of the determinants affecting the implementation of IETPs. Service member, staff, and stakeholder insights will inform the state of implementation at each site, and quantitative measures will provide options for standardized outcome measures. This evaluation is expected to inform national Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Office policies and processes and knowledge translation efforts to improve and expand the IETP. Future work may include cost evaluations and rigorous research, such as randomized controlled trials. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44776 JMIR Publications 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10206625/ /pubmed/37159250 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/44776 Text en ©Jolie N Haun, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Christine Melillo, Jacob Kean, Rachel C Benzinger, Tali Schneider, Mary Jo V Pugh. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.05.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Haun, Jolie N
Nakase-Richardson, Risa
Melillo, Christine
Kean, Jacob
Benzinger, Rachel C
Schneider, Tali
Pugh, Mary Jo V
Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study
title Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study
title_full Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study
title_short Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study
title_sort traumatic brain injury intensive evaluation and treatment program: protocol for a partnered evaluation initiative mixed methods study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37159250
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/44776
work_keys_str_mv AT haunjolien traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy
AT nakaserichardsonrisa traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy
AT melillochristine traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy
AT keanjacob traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy
AT benzingerrachelc traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy
AT schneidertali traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy
AT pughmaryjov traumaticbraininjuryintensiveevaluationandtreatmentprogramprotocolforapartneredevaluationinitiativemixedmethodsstudy