Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Automatic capture algorithms periodically measure the minimal quantity of current needed for pacing, self-adjusting output to guarantee consistent myocardial capture, enhancing patient safety in case of an unexpected rise in thresh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.375 |
_version_ | 1785046285269598208 |
---|---|
author | Ghiglieno, C Dell'era, G Veroli, A D'amico, A De Vecchi, F Porcellini, S Santagostino, M Patti, G |
author_facet | Ghiglieno, C Dell'era, G Veroli, A D'amico, A De Vecchi, F Porcellini, S Santagostino, M Patti, G |
author_sort | Ghiglieno, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Automatic capture algorithms periodically measure the minimal quantity of current needed for pacing, self-adjusting output to guarantee consistent myocardial capture, enhancing patient safety in case of an unexpected rise in threshold and reducing current drain. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging conduction system pacing (CSP) technique which overcomes technical issues and weaknesses of pure Hisian pacing. PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of automatic threshold algorithms in a population of patients with LBBAP. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients receiving LBBAP with different companies which provide LBBAP material) and we evaluated automatic capture threshold algorithms safety and accuracy at 24 hours and at 3 months after implantation. Moreover, when available, home monitoring was used for follow up. RESULTS: We included 45 consecutive patients who underwent LBBAP from January 2022 to August 2022. At 24 hours, mean manual LBBAP threshold was 0.5±0.2 V at 0.4 msec, while automatic LBBAP threshold was 0.5±0.3 V at 0.4 msec (p = 0.30). At 3 months mean manual LBBAP threshold was 0.6±0.2V at 0.4 msec vs 0.6±0.2V at 0.4 msec (p = 0.25). Sensing and impedance measures where optimal at 24 hours and improved during 3 months follow up, respectively from 13.7±4.8 mV to 13.9±4.8 mV (p = 0.6) and from 460.1±130 Ohm to 417.1±96.2 Ohm (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Automatic threshold algorithms are able to effectively measure LBBAP capture threshold both in the acute phase and during follow up. The possibility to safely use automatic threshold algorithms, thus preserving battery and protecting patients against possible future threshold rises, represents another advantage of LBBAP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10206687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102066872023-05-25 Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing Ghiglieno, C Dell'era, G Veroli, A D'amico, A De Vecchi, F Porcellini, S Santagostino, M Patti, G Europace 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Automatic capture algorithms periodically measure the minimal quantity of current needed for pacing, self-adjusting output to guarantee consistent myocardial capture, enhancing patient safety in case of an unexpected rise in threshold and reducing current drain. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging conduction system pacing (CSP) technique which overcomes technical issues and weaknesses of pure Hisian pacing. PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of automatic threshold algorithms in a population of patients with LBBAP. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients receiving LBBAP with different companies which provide LBBAP material) and we evaluated automatic capture threshold algorithms safety and accuracy at 24 hours and at 3 months after implantation. Moreover, when available, home monitoring was used for follow up. RESULTS: We included 45 consecutive patients who underwent LBBAP from January 2022 to August 2022. At 24 hours, mean manual LBBAP threshold was 0.5±0.2 V at 0.4 msec, while automatic LBBAP threshold was 0.5±0.3 V at 0.4 msec (p = 0.30). At 3 months mean manual LBBAP threshold was 0.6±0.2V at 0.4 msec vs 0.6±0.2V at 0.4 msec (p = 0.25). Sensing and impedance measures where optimal at 24 hours and improved during 3 months follow up, respectively from 13.7±4.8 mV to 13.9±4.8 mV (p = 0.6) and from 460.1±130 Ohm to 417.1±96.2 Ohm (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Automatic threshold algorithms are able to effectively measure LBBAP capture threshold both in the acute phase and during follow up. The possibility to safely use automatic threshold algorithms, thus preserving battery and protecting patients against possible future threshold rises, represents another advantage of LBBAP. Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.375 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing Ghiglieno, C Dell'era, G Veroli, A D'amico, A De Vecchi, F Porcellini, S Santagostino, M Patti, G Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
title | Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing |
topic | 14.1 - Antibradycardia Pacing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghiglienoc safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT dellerag safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT verolia safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT damicoa safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT devecchif safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT porcellinis safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT santagostinom safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing AT pattig safetyandefficacyofautomaticcapturethresholdalgorithmsinleftbundlebranchareapacing |