Cargando…
Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to monitor the burden of cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. MES burden is considered a surrogate marker for stroke risk and has never been reporte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206723/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.134 |
_version_ | 1785046291379650560 |
---|---|
author | Della Rocca, D De Asmundis, C Stroker, E Sieira, J Sorgente, A Ceccarelli, A Bala, G Del Monte, A Pannone, L Overeinder, I Ramak, R Mouram, S Almorad, A Natale, A Chierchia, G B |
author_facet | Della Rocca, D De Asmundis, C Stroker, E Sieira, J Sorgente, A Ceccarelli, A Bala, G Del Monte, A Pannone, L Overeinder, I Ramak, R Mouram, S Almorad, A Natale, A Chierchia, G B |
author_sort | Della Rocca, D |
collection | PubMed |
description | FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to monitor the burden of cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. MES burden is considered a surrogate marker for stroke risk and has never been reported during AF ablation with pulsed field ablation (PFA). PURPOSE: To assess the MES burden during AF ablation with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) versus single-shot PFA. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive paroxysmal and persistent AF patients underwent catheter ablation via either single-shot (2000V) PFA [n=7, median age: 56yo (range:53-73), 85.7% males] or point-by point (45W) RF [n=8, median age: 58yo (range 56-74), 62.6% males] under uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and a periprocedural ACT≥300s. Peri-procedural TCD was performed via a robotically-assisted ultrasound system, which includes an Artificial Intelligence-powered robotic headset designed to automate signal acquisition and reduce interoperator variability of TCD findings (Figure 1). Ablation-related asymptomatic cerebral embolism (CE) was assessed via diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 24-48h post-ablation. RESULTS: Among the 7 PFA patients, the median number of applications to achieve PV isolation was 35 (range:33-42). Five (71.4%) patients showed multiple MESs clustered in a shower-like pattern (Figure 2). The overall number of MES-showers was 51 [median: 9 (range:8-15)] and they were temporally correlated with a PFA application. Shower formation was more common after a PFA application to the right superior pulmonary vein [(PV); 19 cases (37.3%)], followed by the right inferior PV [16 cases (31.4%)], the left inferior PV [14 cases (27.5%)], and the left superior PV [2 cases (3.9%)]. A single shower-like pattern was documented among the 8 RF patients, following a stem-pop while ablating at the right inferior PV antrum. There were no procedure-related complications and none of the 15 patients showed any post-ablation neurological symptoms. The mean time from ablation to MRI was 29±4hours; DWI imaging revealed no acute cerebral microembolic lesions. CONCLUSION: PFA generated a relevant number of MESs frequently clustered in short-lasting shower-like patterns. The composition of MESs, their exact mechanism of formation, and the impact on neurological outcomes are unknown and will be addressed in future studies. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10206723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102067232023-05-25 Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging Della Rocca, D De Asmundis, C Stroker, E Sieira, J Sorgente, A Ceccarelli, A Bala, G Del Monte, A Pannone, L Overeinder, I Ramak, R Mouram, S Almorad, A Natale, A Chierchia, G B Europace 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to monitor the burden of cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. MES burden is considered a surrogate marker for stroke risk and has never been reported during AF ablation with pulsed field ablation (PFA). PURPOSE: To assess the MES burden during AF ablation with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) versus single-shot PFA. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive paroxysmal and persistent AF patients underwent catheter ablation via either single-shot (2000V) PFA [n=7, median age: 56yo (range:53-73), 85.7% males] or point-by point (45W) RF [n=8, median age: 58yo (range 56-74), 62.6% males] under uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and a periprocedural ACT≥300s. Peri-procedural TCD was performed via a robotically-assisted ultrasound system, which includes an Artificial Intelligence-powered robotic headset designed to automate signal acquisition and reduce interoperator variability of TCD findings (Figure 1). Ablation-related asymptomatic cerebral embolism (CE) was assessed via diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 24-48h post-ablation. RESULTS: Among the 7 PFA patients, the median number of applications to achieve PV isolation was 35 (range:33-42). Five (71.4%) patients showed multiple MESs clustered in a shower-like pattern (Figure 2). The overall number of MES-showers was 51 [median: 9 (range:8-15)] and they were temporally correlated with a PFA application. Shower formation was more common after a PFA application to the right superior pulmonary vein [(PV); 19 cases (37.3%)], followed by the right inferior PV [16 cases (31.4%)], the left inferior PV [14 cases (27.5%)], and the left superior PV [2 cases (3.9%)]. A single shower-like pattern was documented among the 8 RF patients, following a stem-pop while ablating at the right inferior PV antrum. There were no procedure-related complications and none of the 15 patients showed any post-ablation neurological symptoms. The mean time from ablation to MRI was 29±4hours; DWI imaging revealed no acute cerebral microembolic lesions. CONCLUSION: PFA generated a relevant number of MESs frequently clustered in short-lasting shower-like patterns. The composition of MESs, their exact mechanism of formation, and the impact on neurological outcomes are unknown and will be addressed in future studies. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206723/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.134 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation Della Rocca, D De Asmundis, C Stroker, E Sieira, J Sorgente, A Ceccarelli, A Bala, G Del Monte, A Pannone, L Overeinder, I Ramak, R Mouram, S Almorad, A Natale, A Chierchia, G B Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206723/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dellaroccad cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT deasmundisc cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT strokere cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT sieiraj cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT sorgentea cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT ceccarellia cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT balag cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT delmontea cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT pannonel cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT overeinderi cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT ramakr cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT mourams cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT almorada cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT natalea cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging AT chierchiagb cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging |