Cargando…

Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to monitor the burden of cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. MES burden is considered a surrogate marker for stroke risk and has never been reporte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Della Rocca, D, De Asmundis, C, Stroker, E, Sieira, J, Sorgente, A, Ceccarelli, A, Bala, G, Del Monte, A, Pannone, L, Overeinder, I, Ramak, R, Mouram, S, Almorad, A, Natale, A, Chierchia, G B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206723/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.134
_version_ 1785046291379650560
author Della Rocca, D
De Asmundis, C
Stroker, E
Sieira, J
Sorgente, A
Ceccarelli, A
Bala, G
Del Monte, A
Pannone, L
Overeinder, I
Ramak, R
Mouram, S
Almorad, A
Natale, A
Chierchia, G B
author_facet Della Rocca, D
De Asmundis, C
Stroker, E
Sieira, J
Sorgente, A
Ceccarelli, A
Bala, G
Del Monte, A
Pannone, L
Overeinder, I
Ramak, R
Mouram, S
Almorad, A
Natale, A
Chierchia, G B
author_sort Della Rocca, D
collection PubMed
description FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to monitor the burden of cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. MES burden is considered a surrogate marker for stroke risk and has never been reported during AF ablation with pulsed field ablation (PFA). PURPOSE: To assess the MES burden during AF ablation with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) versus single-shot PFA. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive paroxysmal and persistent AF patients underwent catheter ablation via either single-shot (2000V) PFA [n=7, median age: 56yo (range:53-73), 85.7% males] or point-by point (45W) RF [n=8, median age: 58yo (range 56-74), 62.6% males] under uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and a periprocedural ACT≥300s. Peri-procedural TCD was performed via a robotically-assisted ultrasound system, which includes an Artificial Intelligence-powered robotic headset designed to automate signal acquisition and reduce interoperator variability of TCD findings (Figure 1). Ablation-related asymptomatic cerebral embolism (CE) was assessed via diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 24-48h post-ablation. RESULTS: Among the 7 PFA patients, the median number of applications to achieve PV isolation was 35 (range:33-42). Five (71.4%) patients showed multiple MESs clustered in a shower-like pattern (Figure 2). The overall number of MES-showers was 51 [median: 9 (range:8-15)] and they were temporally correlated with a PFA application. Shower formation was more common after a PFA application to the right superior pulmonary vein [(PV); 19 cases (37.3%)], followed by the right inferior PV [16 cases (31.4%)], the left inferior PV [14 cases (27.5%)], and the left superior PV [2 cases (3.9%)]. A single shower-like pattern was documented among the 8 RF patients, following a stem-pop while ablating at the right inferior PV antrum. There were no procedure-related complications and none of the 15 patients showed any post-ablation neurological symptoms. The mean time from ablation to MRI was 29±4hours; DWI imaging revealed no acute cerebral microembolic lesions. CONCLUSION: PFA generated a relevant number of MESs frequently clustered in short-lasting shower-like patterns. The composition of MESs, their exact mechanism of formation, and the impact on neurological outcomes are unknown and will be addressed in future studies. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10206723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102067232023-05-25 Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging Della Rocca, D De Asmundis, C Stroker, E Sieira, J Sorgente, A Ceccarelli, A Bala, G Del Monte, A Pannone, L Overeinder, I Ramak, R Mouram, S Almorad, A Natale, A Chierchia, G B Europace 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to monitor the burden of cerebral microembolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. MES burden is considered a surrogate marker for stroke risk and has never been reported during AF ablation with pulsed field ablation (PFA). PURPOSE: To assess the MES burden during AF ablation with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) versus single-shot PFA. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive paroxysmal and persistent AF patients underwent catheter ablation via either single-shot (2000V) PFA [n=7, median age: 56yo (range:53-73), 85.7% males] or point-by point (45W) RF [n=8, median age: 58yo (range 56-74), 62.6% males] under uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and a periprocedural ACT≥300s. Peri-procedural TCD was performed via a robotically-assisted ultrasound system, which includes an Artificial Intelligence-powered robotic headset designed to automate signal acquisition and reduce interoperator variability of TCD findings (Figure 1). Ablation-related asymptomatic cerebral embolism (CE) was assessed via diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 24-48h post-ablation. RESULTS: Among the 7 PFA patients, the median number of applications to achieve PV isolation was 35 (range:33-42). Five (71.4%) patients showed multiple MESs clustered in a shower-like pattern (Figure 2). The overall number of MES-showers was 51 [median: 9 (range:8-15)] and they were temporally correlated with a PFA application. Shower formation was more common after a PFA application to the right superior pulmonary vein [(PV); 19 cases (37.3%)], followed by the right inferior PV [16 cases (31.4%)], the left inferior PV [14 cases (27.5%)], and the left superior PV [2 cases (3.9%)]. A single shower-like pattern was documented among the 8 RF patients, following a stem-pop while ablating at the right inferior PV antrum. There were no procedure-related complications and none of the 15 patients showed any post-ablation neurological symptoms. The mean time from ablation to MRI was 29±4hours; DWI imaging revealed no acute cerebral microembolic lesions. CONCLUSION: PFA generated a relevant number of MESs frequently clustered in short-lasting shower-like patterns. The composition of MESs, their exact mechanism of formation, and the impact on neurological outcomes are unknown and will be addressed in future studies. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Oxford University Press 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10206723/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.134 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation
Della Rocca, D
De Asmundis, C
Stroker, E
Sieira, J
Sorgente, A
Ceccarelli, A
Bala, G
Del Monte, A
Pannone, L
Overeinder, I
Ramak, R
Mouram, S
Almorad, A
Natale, A
Chierchia, G B
Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
title Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort cerebral microembolic signal burden during pulsed field ablation: preliminary results from robotically-assisted transcranial doppler and magnetic resonance imaging
topic 10.4.5 - Rhythm Control, Catheter Ablation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206723/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.134
work_keys_str_mv AT dellaroccad cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT deasmundisc cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT strokere cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sieiraj cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sorgentea cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ceccarellia cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT balag cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT delmontea cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT pannonel cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT overeinderi cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ramakr cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mourams cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT almorada cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT natalea cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT chierchiagb cerebralmicroembolicsignalburdenduringpulsedfieldablationpreliminaryresultsfromroboticallyassistedtranscranialdopplerandmagneticresonanceimaging