Association between left ventricular wall-thickness by CT and endocardial voltage potentials in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for planning ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, its accuracy is hindered in patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD) and resynchronization therapy (CRT). Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has emerged as an alternative for ablation planning in these patients. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the relationship between wall thickness (WT) on CT and voltage of electrical potentials on endocardial electroanatomic mapping (EAM) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Single centre retrospective study enrolling consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy referred for endocardial VT ablation that underwent cardiac CT for procedure planning since 2021. Patients were excluded if EAM had < 1000 data points. ADAS 3D® software was used to analyse CT images, automatically segmenting the left ventricle (LV) into the 17 American Heart Association segments and calculating end-diastolic WT for each one. Four standardized views (anterior-posterior, posterior-anterior, superior, and inferior) of the segmented LV on ADAS 3D® were used to aid in manual segmentation of the EAM. The endocardial voltage maps were created using CARTO3® software (Figure 1). For each patient, EAM was interpreted to create 2 different bulls’ eye maps, according to the presence or absence of bipolar potentials < 0.5 (dense scar) or < 1.5mV (low voltage). Only segments with >20% extension of low bipolar voltage were considered as altered. RESULTS: We included a cohort of 8 patients (mean age 67±12 years, 87.5% male, median LVEF of 32% [IQR 25-49]). All but one patient had implanted cardiac device (6 ICD, 1 CRT-D). Cardiac CT was performed 1 day (IQR 0-2) before the ablation. Overall, 136 segments were analysed, 8 of which did not have voltage information. Of the remaining 128, 51 (39.8%) had dense scar and 57 (41.9%) had low voltage. There was a good correlation between mean WT and the presence or absence of both dense scar (area under de curve (AUC) 0.799, p<0.001) and low voltage (AUC 0.838, p<0.001) in each LV segment. CONCLUSION: WT measured by CT appears to have a strong correlation with dense scar and low voltage in EAM in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing VT ablation. This technique may be useful to plan interventions in patients in whom CMR is not feasible. [Figure: see text]